The influence of interactions between accommodation and convergence on the lag of accommodation

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 134-150

  Schor, Clifton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; MODEL; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033033904     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00409.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbott M. L., Schmid K. L., Strang N. C. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 18:1998;13-20.
2. Alpern M., Ellen P. A quantitative analysis of the horizontal movements of the eyes in the experiments of Johannes Muller. I Methods and results. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 42:1956;289-303.
3. Bobier, W. R., Epp, K. L. and Stephen, C. M. (1998). Convergence-accommodation is reduced in young myopes. Invest. Ophthalmol & Vis. Sci. 39(4) ARVO Suppl abs 2981. p. S640.
4. Ebenholtz S. M., Fisher K. Distance adaptation depends upon plasticity in the oculomotor control system. Perception & Psychophysics. 31:1982;551-560.
5. Fincham E. F. The proportion of ciliary muscular force required for accommodation. J. Physiol. Lond. 128:1955;99-112.
6. Fincham E. F., Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and vergence. J. Physiol. Lond. 137:1957;488-508.
7. Flitcroft, D. I. and Eustace, P. (1997). Emmetropization and late onset myopia: the role of retinal image quality and the accommodation system. Invest. Ophthalmol & Vis. Sci. 38, ARVO abstract 2156. p. S461.
8. Flom M. C. On the relationship between accommodation and accommodative convergence. II Stability. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 37:1960;23-517.
9. Goss, D. A. 1988. Retinal image-mediated ocular growth as a possible aetiological factor in juvenile-onset myopia. Vision Science Symposium/A tribute to Gordon Heath. Indiana University, Bloomington. pp. 165-183.
10. Goss D. A., Wickham M. G. Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. A literature review. Doc. Ophthalmol. 90:1995;341-375.
11. Goss D. A., Zhai H. Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review. Doc. Ophthalmol. 86:1994;349-380.
12. Green D. G., Powers M. K., Banks M. S. Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity. Vision Research. 20:1980;827-835.
13. Gwiazda J., Bauer J., Thorn F., Held R. Shifts in tonic accommodation after near work are related to refractive errors in children. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 15:1995;93-97.
14. Gwiazda J., Thorn F., Bauer J., Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 34:1993;690-694.
15. Hoffmann F. B., Bielchowsky A. Uber die der Wilkue entzogenen Fusions-Bewegungen der Augen. Arch. Gesample Physiol. 80:1900;1-40.
16. Hofstetter, H. W. 1983. Graphical Analysis. ed. C. M. Schor and K. Ciuffreda. In: Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Butterworths, Boston, pp. 439-464.
17. Hung G. K. Linear model of accommodation and vergence can account for discrepancies between AC/A measures using the fixation disparity and phoria methods. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 11:1991;275-278.
18. Hung G. K. Adaptation model of accommodation and vergence. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. 12:1992;319-326.
19. Hung L. F., Crawford M. L. J., Smith E. L. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Med. 1:1995;761-765.
20. Hung G. K., Semmlow J. L. Static behavior of accommodation and vergence: computer simulation of an interactive dual-feedback system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27:1980;439-447.
21. Irving E. L., Callender M. G., Sivak J. G. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom. Vis. Sci. 68:1991;364-368.
22. Jiang B. Parameters of accommodative and vergence systems and the development of late-onset myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36:1995;1737-1742.
23. Jiang B. C. Dark focus and dark vergence: an experimental verification of the configuration of the dual-interactive feedback model. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;342-347.
24. Jiang B. C. Accommodative vergence is driven by the phasic component of the accommodative controller. Vision Res. 36:1996;97-101.
25. Judge S. J., Cumming B. G. Neurons in the monkey midbrain with activity related to vergence eye movement and accommodation. J. Neurophysiol. 55:1986;30-915.
26. Kotulak J., Schor C. M. The accommodative response to sub-threshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon. Perception. 15:1986;7-15.
27. Kotulak J., Schor C. M. The dissociability of accommodation from vergence in the dark. Invest. Ophthal. & Vis. Sci. 27:1986;544-551.
28. Lakkis G., Bruce A. S. The effect of vergence adaptation on convergent accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiol. Optics. 9:1989;97-98.
29. Mays L. E., Gamlin P. D. R. Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5:1995;8-763.
30. McBrien N. A., Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodation response gradient. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 6:1986;145-149.
31. Ogle K. N. The accommodative convergence accommodation ratio and its relation to the correction of refractive error. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 70:1966;30-322.
32. Polak N. A., Jones R. Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence. IEEE Trans on Biomed Engineering. 37:1990;1011-1014.
33. Riggs L. A., Neihle W. Eye movements recorded during convergence and divergence. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50:1960;913-920.
34. Rosenfield M., Gilmartin B. Accommodative adaptation induced by sustained disparity-vergence. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 65:1988;118-12615.
35. Rosenfield, M. and Gilmartin, B. (1998). Accommodative adaptation during sustained near vision reduces accommodative error. Invest. Ophthalmol. & Vis. Sci. 39(4) ARVO Suppl abs 2979. p. S639.
36. Schaeffel F., Glasser A., Howland H. C. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Research. 28:1988;639-657.
37. Schor C. M. The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity. Vision Research. 19:1979;757-765.
38. Schor C. M. The relationship between fusional vergence eye movements and fixation disparity. Vision Research. 19:1979;1359-1367.
39. Schor C. M. Fixation disparity: steady-state error of disparity induced vergence. Am. J. Optom. 57:(9):1980;618-631.
40. Schor C. M. Imbalanced adaptation of accommodation and vergence produces opposite extremes of the AC/A and CA/C ratios. Am. J. Optom. & Physiol. Optics. 65:(5):1988;341-348.
41. Schor C. M. A Dynamic Model of Cross-Coupling Between Accommodation and Convergence: Simulation of Step and Frequency Responses. Optom. and Vis. Sci. 69:1992;258-269.
42. Schor C. M., Horner D. Adaptive disorders of accommodation and vergence in binocular dysfunction. Ophthalmic and Physiol Opt. 9:1989;264-268.
43. Schor C. M., Johnson C., Post R. Adaptation of tonic accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiol. Optics. 4:(2):1984;133-137.
44. Schor C. M., Kotulak J. Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive. Vision Res. 26:1986;927-942.
45. Schor C. M., Kotulak J. Adaptation of tonic accommodation reduces accommodative lag and is masked in darkness. Invest. Ophthal. 27:1986;820-827.
46. Schor C. M., McLin L. N. Jr. The effect of luminance on accommodative and convergence aftereffects. Clin. Vis. Sci. 3:(2):1988;143-154.
47. Schor C. M., Narayan V. Graphical analysis of prism adaptation, convergence accommodation and accommodative convergence. Am. J. Optom. and Physiol. Optics. 59:(10):1982;774-784.
48. Schor C. M., Tsuetaki T. Fatigue of accommodation and vergence modifies their mutual interactions. Invest. Ophthalmol. & Vis. Sci. 28:1987;1250-1259.
49. Sheedy, J. and Saladin, J. 1983. Validity of diagnostic criteria and case analysis in binocular vision disorders. ed. C. M. Schor and K. Ciuffreda. In: Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Butterworths, Boston, pp. 517-540.
50. Tsuetaki T., Schor C. M. Clinical method for measuring adaptaiton of tonic accommodation and vergence accommodation. Am. J. Optometry and Physiol. Optics. 64:1987;437-449.
51. Von Noorden, G. K. 1996. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus. 5th edn. St. Louis: Mosby.
52. Wallman J., McFadden S. Monkey eyes grow into focus. Nature Medicine. 1:1995;737-739.
53. Wick B., London R. Analysis of binocular visual functions using tests made under binocular conditions. Am. J. Optom. Physiol Opt. 64:1987;227-240.
54. Wildsoet C., Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms for compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Research. 35:1995;1175-1194.