Myopia control trial with progressive addition lenses in Japanese schoolchildren: Baseline measures of refraction, accommodation, and heterophoria

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 23-30

  Hasebe, Satoshi ^a   Nonaka, Fumitaka ^a   Nakatsuka, Chiaki ^a   Ohtsuki, Hiroshi ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accommodative lag; Early onset myopia; Heterophoria; Progressive addition lenses; Refraction

Indexed keywords

TROPICAMIDE;

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISEASE COURSE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROPHORIA; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; NEUROTOXICITY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REFRACTION INDEX; SPECTACLES; STRABISMUS;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; STRABISMUS;

EID: 13844256493     PISSN: 00215155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-004-0131-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Matsumura H, Hirai H. Prevalence of myopia and refractive changes in students from 3 to 17 years of age. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;44 Suppl 1:109-115.
2. Kleinstein RN, Jones LA, Hullet S, et al. Refractive error and ethnicity in children. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1141-1147.
3. Watanabe S, Yamashita T, Ohba N. A longitudinal study of cycloplegic refraction in a cohort of 350 Japanese schoolchildren. Cycloplegic refraction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999;19:22-29.
4. Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Hyman L, Hussein M, Norton TT; COMET Study Group. Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:314-321.
5. Saw SM, Shih-Yen EC, Koh A, Tan D. Interventions to retard myopia progression in children: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology 2002;109:415-421.
6. Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Norton TT, Hussein M; COMET Group. The correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET): design and general baseline characteristics. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:573-592.
7. Edwards MH, Li RW, Lam CS, Lew JK, Yu BS. The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study. Study design and main outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2852-2858.
8. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1492-1500.
9. Hasebe S. A clinical trial to evaluate progressive addition lenses on myopia control. Study design. Jpn J Vis Sci 2002;23:63-68.
10. Manny RE, Hussein M, Scheiman M, Kurtz D, Niemann K, Zinzer K; COMET Study Group. Tropicamide, 1% is an effective cycloplegic agent for myopic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1728-1735.
11. Rosenfield M, Mollen EAH. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt 2001;21:101-107.
12. Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between adult myopes and emmetropes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:291-298.
13. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:690-694.
14. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:367-375.
15. Shinohara M, Hashimoto T, Yago K. An evaluation of topical tropicamide treatment of mild myopia in schoolchildren. Nippon Ganka Kiyo (Folia Ophthalmol Jpn) 1998;49:685-698.
16. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford Medical Publications; 1995.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods of assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-310.
18. Tokoro T, Kabe S. Treatment of the myopia and the changes in optical components. Report 2. Full- or under-correction of myopia by glasses. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi (Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn) 1965;69:140-144.
19. Doss DA. Effect of spectacle correction on the progression of myopia in children - A literature review. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65:117-128.
20. Inagaki Y. Age related change in corneal curvature. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi (Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn) 1987;91:132-139.
21. Morita Y, Deguchi H, Shirao Y. Corneal curvature in young students - relation to age, sex, refraction, and stature. J Jpn C/L Soc 1999;41:108-112.
22. Matsumura K, Inoue S. Correlation between refraction and optical component in children and adults. Rinsho Ganka (Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol). 1988;42:653-656.
23. Yamaji R. Study on pseudomyopia. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi (Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn) 1968;72:2083-2150.
24. Maruo T, Kubota N, Arimoto H, et al. A cross-sectional study of cyclopentlate-cycloplegic refraction in primary school and junior high school children. Rinsho Ganka (Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol) 1977;71:709-711.
25. Smith EL III. Environmentally induced refractive errors in animals. In: Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, editors. Myopia and near-work. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1998. p. 57-90.
26. Rouse MW, Hutter RF. Normative study of the accommodative lag in elementary school children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61:693-697.
27. Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and near point phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:292-294.
28. Schor C. The influence of interactions between accommodation and convergence on the lag of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999;19:134-150.
29. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE. A randomized trial of the effect of the single vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:395-401.
30. Brown B, Edwards MH, Leubg JT. Is esophoria a factor in slowing of myopia by progressive lenses? Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:638-642.