Development of nuclear gene-derived molecular markers linked to legume genetic maps

Molecular Genetics and Genomics

Volumn 276, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 56-70

  Choi, Hong Kyu ^a   Luckow, Melissa A ^b   Doyle, Jeff ^b   Cook, Douglas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative genomics; Legumes; Phylogenetic analysis

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR MARKER;

ARTICLE; CLADISTICS; COMPARATIVE GENOMICS; DIPLOIDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; EXON; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; INTRON; INVERTED REPEAT; LEGUME; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TAXONOMY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, PLANT; EXONS; FABACEAE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; INTRONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

FABACEAE;

EID: 33745362925     PISSN: 16174615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-006-0118-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alvarez I, Wendel JF (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:417-434
2. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-436
3. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant A rabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796-815
4. Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP (2001) Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Syst Bot 26:487-514
5. Cannon SB, Zhu H, Baumgarten AM, Spangler R, May G, Cook DR, Young ND (2002) Diversity, distribution, and ancient taxonomic relationships within the TIR and non-TIR NBS-LRR resistance gene subfamilies. J Mol Evol 54:548-562
6. Causier B, Castillo R, Zhou J, Ingram R, Xue Y, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Davies B (2005) Evolution in action: following function in duplicated floral homeotic genes. Curr Biol 15:1508-1512
7. Choi HK, Kim D, Uhm T, Limpens E, Lim H et al (2004a) A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker co-linearity with Medicago sativa. Genetics 166:1463-1502
8. Choi HK, Mun JH, Kim DJ, Zhu H, Baek JM et al (2004b) Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15289-15294
9. Doyle JJ, Gaut BS (2000) Evolution of genes and taxa: a primer. Plant Mol Biol 42:1-23
10. Doyle JJ, Luckow MA (2003) The rest of the iceberg: legume diversity and evolution in a phylogenetic context. Plant Physiol 131:900-910
11. Fulton TM, Van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT, Tanksley SD (2002) Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:1457-1467
12. Gaut BS (1998) Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rate in higher plants. Evol Biol 35:93-120
13. Kajita T, Ohashi H, Tateishi Y, Bailey CD, Doyle JJ (2001) RbcL and legume phylogeny, with particular reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae and allies. Syst Bot 26:515-536
14. Koonin EV (2001) An apology for orthologs - or brave new memes. Genome Biol 2(4):1005
15. Lavin M, Eshbaugh E, Hu JM, Mathews S, Sharrock RA (1998) Monophyletic subgroups of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) as revealed by phytochrome nucleotide sequence data. Am J Bot 85:412-433
16. Lewis G, Schire B, Mackinder B, Lock M (2005) Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
17. Pennington RT, Lavin M, Ireland H, Klitgaard B, Preston J et al (2001) Phylogenetic relationships of basal papilionoid legumes based upon sequences of the chloroplast trnL intron. Syst Bot 26:537-556
18. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB (2003) Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804
19. Sanderson MJ, Shaffer HB (2002)Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:49-72
20. Sang T (2002) Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37:121-147
21. Scherson R, Choi HK, Cook DR, Sanderson M (2005) Phylogenetics of New World Astragalus: screening of novel nuclear loci for the reconstruction of phylogenies at low taxonomic levels. Brittonia 57:56-66
22. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L et al (2004) Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47:868-876
23. Small RL, Cronn RC, Wendel JF (2004) Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Aust Syst Bot 17:145-170
24. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Savolainen V, Hilu K, Qiu YL et al (2004) Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and 'ending incongruence': a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci 9:477-483
25. Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*, phylogenetic analyses using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, Version 4.0b10
26. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Hoggins DG (1997) The CLUSYAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:15
27. Wendel JF, Doyle JJ (1998) Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants, 2nd edn. pp 265-296
28. Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ (2004) A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analyses of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am J Bot 91:1846-1862
29. Wolfe KH, Sharp PM, Li WH (1989) Rates of the synonymous substitution in plant nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 29:208-211