The negative compatibility effect: A case for self-inhibition

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 227-240

  Schlaghecken, Friederike ^a   Rowley, Laura ^a   Sembi, Sukhdev ^a   Simmons, Rachel ^a   Whitcomb, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Masked priming; Negative compatibility effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 47149111335     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0027-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aron, A., Schlaghecken, F., Fletcher, P., Bullmore, E., Eimer, M., Barker, R., Sahakian, B., & Robbins, T. (2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: Evidence from fMRI and Huntington's disease. Brain, 126, 713-723. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=12566291 [PubMed]
2. Band, G. P., & van Boxtel G. J. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=10344185 [PubMed]
3. Bowman, H., Schlaghecken, F. & Eimer, M. (2006). A neural network model of inhibitory processes in subliminal priming. Visual Cognition, 13, 401-480.
4. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P.-F., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 9783584 [PubMed]
5. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=11116580 [PubMed]
6. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=10344189 [PubMed]
7. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=9861720 [PubMed]
8. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=12412891 [PubMed]
9. Faw, B. (2003). Pre-frontal executive committee for perception, working memory, attention, long-term memory, motor control, and thinking: A tutorial review. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 83-139. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 12617864 [PubMed]
10. Hommel, B. (2007). Consciousness and control: Not identical twins. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 155-176.
11. Hurvich, L. M., & Jameson, D. (1974). Opponent processes as a model of neural organization. American Psychologist, 29, 88-102. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 4204851 [PubMed]
12. Jaskowski, P., & Przekoracka-Krawczyk, A. (2005). On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 65, 409-317. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16366393 [PubMed]
13. Jaskowski, P., & Slósarek, M. (2007). How important is a prime's gestalt for subliminal priming? Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 485-497. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16919477 [PubMed]
14. Klapp, S. T. (2005). Two versions of negative compatibility have different properties: A reply to Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134. 431-435. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16131274 [PubMed]
15. Klapp, S. T., & Haas, B. W. (2005). The non-conscious influence of masked stimuli on response selection is limited to concrete stimulus-response associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 193-209. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=15709873 [PubMed]
16. Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 12049243 [PubMed]
17. Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
18. Levine, D. S., & Leven, S. J. (1991). Inhibition in the nervous system: Models of its roles in choice and context determination. Neurochemical Research, 16, 381-395. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=1685768 [PubMed]
19. Lingnau, A., & Vorberg, D. (2005). The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 545-57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=16119400 [PubMed]
20. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=15584802 [PubMed]
21. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: A reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
22. Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2006). How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming - A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 495-500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16846278 [PubMed]
23. Marcel, A. J. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 435-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 168-180. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=9157183 [PubMed]
25. Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Consciousness & Cognition, 4, 422-439. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=8750417 [PubMed]
26. Neill, W. T., Valdes., L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). San Diego: Academic Press.
27. Pearson, K. G. (1993). Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 16, 256-297. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=8460894 [PubMed]
28. Pribe, C., Grossberg, S., & Cohen, M. A. (1997). Neural control of interlimb oscillation II. Biped and quadruped gaits and bifurcations. Biological Cybernetics, 77, 141-152. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=9323863 [PubMed]
29. Schlaghecken, F., Blagrove, E., & Maylor, E. A. (in press). No difference between conscious and nonconscious visuomotor control: Evidence from perceptual learning in the masked prime task. Consciousness and Cognition. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=17196397 [PubMed]
30. Schlaghecken, F., Bowman, H., & Eimer, M. (2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618-494. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=16822128 [PubMed]
31. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (1997). The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation. Sprache & Kognition, 16, 166-175.
32. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central/peripheral asymmetry in subliminal priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=11143449 [PubMed]
33. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=11916298 [PubMed]
34. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484-494. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16846277 [PubMed]
35. Schubö, A., Schlaghecken, F., & Meinecke, C. (2001). Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 919-931. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 11518153 [PubMed]
36. Seiss, E., & Praamstra, P. (2004). The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: Evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 127, 330-339. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 14645146 [PubMed]
37. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=2251928 [PubMed]
38. Sumner, P. (in press). Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect. Experimental Psychology.
39. Tsushima, Y., Sasaki, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2006). Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor. Science 314, 1786-1788. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=17170308 [PubMed]
40. Verleger, R., Görgen, S., & Jaskowski, P. (2005). An ERP indicator of processing relevant gestalts in masked priming. Psychophysiology, 42, 677-690. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16364063 [PubMed]
41. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez? cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=15584803 [PubMed]
42. Verleger, R., KÖtter, T., Jaskowski, P., Sprenger, A., & Siebner, H. (2006). A TMS study on non-consciously triggered response tendencies in the motor cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 115-129. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=16506010 [PubMed]
43. Allport, A., Tipper, S., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner, & O. S.M. Martin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.