Mask-induced priming and the negative compatibility effect

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 133-141

  Sumner, Petroc ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Automatic; Inhibition; Perception; Subliminal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME;

EID: 41749083705     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.2.133     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The "oblique effect" in man and animais. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
2. Aron, A.R., Schlaghecken, F., Fletcher, P.C., Bullmore, E.T., Eimer, M., Barker, R. et al. (2003). Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by the caudate and thalamus: Evidence from functional MRI and Huntington's disease. Brain, 126, 713-723.
3. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
4. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 514-520.
5. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003), Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64, 7-26.
6. Huber, D.E., Shiffrin, R.M., Lyle, K.B., & Ruys, K.I. (2001). Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review, 108, 652.
7. Huber, D.E., Shiffrin, R.M., Quach, R., & Lyle, K.B. (2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 745-757.
8. Jaskowski, P. (2007). The effect of nonmasking distractors on the priming of motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 456-468.
9. Jaskowski, P., & Przekoracka-Krawczyk, A. (2005). On the role of mask structure in subliminal priming. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 65, 409-417.
10. Klapp, S.T. (2005). Two versions of the negative compatibility effect: Comment on Lleras and Enns (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 431-435.
11. Klapp, S.T., & Hinkley, L.B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255-269.
12. Lachter, J., Forster, K.I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.
13. Lleras, A., & Enns, J.T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475-493.
14. Lleras, A., & Enns, J.T. (2005). Updating a cautionary tale of masked priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 436-440.
15. Lleras, A., & Enns, J.T. (2006). How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: A reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 495-500.
16. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
17. Praamstra, P., & Seiss, E. (2005). The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 483-493.
18. Schlaghecken, F., Bowman, H., & Eimer, M. (2006). Dissociating local and global levels of perceptuo-motor control in masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 618-632.
19. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
20. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.
21. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2004). Masked prime stimuli can bias "free" choices between response alternatives. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 463-468.
22. Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 484-494.
23. Seiss, E., & Praamstra, P. (2004). The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: Evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 127, 330-339.
24. Seiss, E., & Praamstra, P. (2006). Time-course of masked response priming and inhibition in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 44, 869-875.
25. Sumner, P. (2007). Negative and positive masked-priming - implications for motor inhibition. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 317-326.
26. Sumner, P., Tsai, P.-C., Yu, K., & Nachev, P. (2006). Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 103, 10520-10525.
27. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., Aydemir, A., van der Lubbe, R.H., & Groen, M. (2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494-515.