An ERP indicator of processing relevant gestalts in masked priming

Psychophysiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 677-690

  Verleger, Rolf ^a   Görgen, Stefani ^a   Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

Author keywords

Arrows; Event related potentials; Gestalt; Masked priming; Relevance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GESTALT THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MASKED PRIMING; MASKING; NEGATIVE DIFFERENCE MASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33644878188     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.354.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Carmel D. Bentin S. ( 2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1 29.
2. Carriero L. Vasile E. Budai R. Weiss L. Battaglini P. P. ( 2004). Arrows indicating direction modulate N1 amplitude. Poster presented at the Evoked Potentials International Conference XIV, Leipzig, March 28-31, 2004.
3. Cheesman J. Merikle P. M. ( 1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387 395.
4. Eimer M. ( 1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293 313.
5. Eimer M. ( 2000). Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 145 158.
6. Eimer M. Schlaghecken F. ( 1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737 1747.
7. Eimer M. Schlaghecken F. ( 2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514 520.
8. Enns J. T. Di Lollo V. ( 2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345 352.
9. Gauthier I. Curran T. Curby K. M. Collins D. ( 2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428 432.
10. Hopf J.-M. Boelmans K. Schoenfeld M. A. Luck S. J. Heinze H.-J. ( 2004). Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: Evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1822 1832.
11. Itier R. J. Taylor M. J. Lobaugh N. J. ( 2004). Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related potentials to upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces: Effects on encoding and recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 643 653.
12. James M. S. Johnstone S. J. Hayward W. G. ( 2001). Event-related potentials, configural encoding, and feature-based encoding in face recognition. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 275 285.
13. Jaśkowski P. Skalska B. Verleger R. ( 2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911 920.
14. Kenemans J. L. Baas J. M. P. Mangun G. R. Lijffijt M. Verbaten M. N. ( 2000). On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1113 1123.
15. Kenemans J. L. Kok A. Smulders F. T. Y. ( 1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 51 63.
16. Klapp S. T. Hinkley L. B. ( 2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 255 269.
17. Klotz W. Neumann O. ( 1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976 992.
18. Lingnau A. Vorberg D. ( 2005). The time-course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 545 557.
19. Lleras A. Enns J. T. ( 2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 475 493.
20. Martínez A. Di Russo F. Anllo-Vento L. Hillyard S. A. ( 2001). Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1980 1998.
21. Miniussi C. Rao A. Nobre A. C. ( 2002). Watching where you look: Modulation of visual processing of foveal stimuli by spatial attention. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2448 2460.
22. Praamstra P. Boutsen L. Humphreys G. W. ( 2005). Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. Journal of Neuroscience, 94, 764 774.
23. Praamstra P. Seiss E. ( 2005). The neurophysiology of response competition: Motor cortex activation and inhibition following subliminal response priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 483 493.
24. Reinvang I. Magnussen S. Greenlee M. W. ( 2002). Hemispheric asymmetry in visual discrimination and memory: ERP evidence for the spatial frequency hypothesis. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 483 495.
25. Rossion B. Delvenne J.-F. Debatisse D. Goffaux V. Bruyer R. Crommelinck M., et al 1999). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology, 50, 173 189.
26. Sagiv N. Bentin S. ( 2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937 951.
27. Schlaghecken F. Eimer M. ( 2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148 162.
28. Schubö A. Schlaghecken F. Meinecke C. ( 2001). Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 919 931.
29. Seiss E. Praamstra P. ( 2004). The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: Evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 127, 330 339.
30. Stern J. A. Walrath L. C. Goldstein R. ( 1984). The endogenous eyeblink. Psychophysiology, 21, 22 33.
31. Tanaka J. Curran T. ( 2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43 47.
32. Verleger R. Ewers T. Jaśkowski P. ( 2005). On the special role of arrow-masked arrows as flankers: Inverse priming depends on types of stimuli and of masks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33. Verleger R. Jaśkowski P. Aydemir A. van der Lubbe R. H. J. Groen M. ( 2004). Qualitative differences between conscious and non-conscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 494 515.
34. Verleger R. Vollmer C. Wauschkuhn B. Van der Lubbe R. H. J. Wascher E. ( 2000). Dimensional overlap between arrows as cueing stimuli and responses? Evidence from contra-ipsilateral differences in EEG potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 99 109.
35. Xu Y. Liu J. Kanwisher N. ( 2005). The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise. Neuropsychologia, 43, 588 597.