Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 91-98

  Wilson, K R ^a,b   Pearson, P M ^b,c   Matheson, H E ^a,d   Marotta, J J ^a,b  

^a Neuropsychology of Vision Perception and Action Lab   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

^d Department of Psychology ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; Binocular; Perception; Stereopsis; Temporal; Visuomotor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 46649110738     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1407-8     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bennett SJ, Ashford D, Elliot D (2003a) Intermittent vision and one-handed catching: The temporal limits of binocular and monocular integration. Motor Control 7:378-387
2. Bennett SJ, Elliot D, Weeks DJ, Keil D (2003b) The effects of intermittent vision on prehension under binocular and monocular viewing. Motor Control 7(1):46-56
3. Bennett SJ, Rioja N, Ashford D, Coull J, Elliot D (2006) Integration of intermittent visual samples over time and between the eyes. J Mot Behav 38(6):439-450
4. Chajka K, Vecellio E, Hayhoe M, Gillam B (2007) The role of binocular vision in navigating objects. Vision Sci Soc 213
5. Churchill A, Hopkins B, Ronnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81-89
6. Cogan AI, Lomakin AJ, Rossi AF (1993) Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay. Vision Res 33:1959-1975
7. Coltheart M (1980) Iconic memory and visible persistence. Percept Psychophys 27:183-228
8. Connolly JD, Goodale MA (1999) The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res 125(3):281-286
9. DeLucia P (2005) Does binocular disparity or familiar size information override effects of relative size on judgments of time to contact? Q J Exp Psychol 58A(5):865-886
10. Desanghere L, Marotta JJ (2008) The specificity of learned associations in visuomotor and perceptual processing. Exp Brain Res. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1328-6
11. Efron R (1957) Stereoscopic vision I: effect of binocular summation. Br J Ophthamol 41:709-730
12. Engel GR (1970) An investigation of visual responses to brief stereoscopic stimuli. Q J Exp Psychol 22:148-166
13. Faillenot I, Toni I, Decety J, Gregoire M, Jeannerod M (1997) Visual pathways for object-oriented action and object recognition: functional anatomy with PET. Cereb Cortex 7:77-85
14. Gheorghiu E, Erkelens CJ (2005a) Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Perception 34:1205-1219
15. Gheorghui E, Erkelens CJ (2005b) Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 45:1603-1614
16. Goodale MA, Haffenden AM (2003) Interactions between the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing. Adv Neurol 93:249-267
17. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15(1):20-25
18. Goodale MA, Milner AD (2004) Sight unseen: an exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford Univeristy Press, Oxford
19. Goodale MA, Westwood DA (2004) An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:203-211
20. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 10:154-156
21. Greenwald HS, Knill DC, Saunders JA (2005) Integrating visual cues for motor control: a matter of time. Vision Res 45:1975-1989
22. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (2000) Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Res 40(10-12):1597-1607
23. Hartung B, Schrater PR, Bulthoff HH, Kersten D, Franz VH (2005) Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching? J Vision 5:504-514
24. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS, Banks MS (2004) Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. J Vision 4:967-992
25. Jackson SR, Jones CA, Newport R, Pritchard C (1997) A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions. Vis cogn 4(2):113-142
26. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199-208
27. Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, Hilsdale, pp 153-158
28. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16(3):235-254
29. Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford University Press, Oxford
30. Julesz B (1960) Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell Labs Tech J 39:1125-1162
31. Julesz B, White BW (1969) Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich Phenomenon. Nature 22:639-641
32. Knill DC (2005) Reaching for visual cues to depth: The brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception. J Vision 5:103-115
33. Knill DC (2007) Robust cue integration: a bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and gifure cues to slant. J Vision 7(7):5, 1-24
34. Knill DC, Saunders JA (2003) Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 43:2539-2558
35. Loftus A, Servos P, Goodale MA, Mandarozqueta N, Mon-Williams N (2004) When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance. Exp Brain Res 158(3):317-327
36. Ludwig I, Pieper W, Lachnit H (2007) Temporal integration of monocular images separated in time: stereopsis, stereoacuity, and binocular luster. Percept Psychophys 69(1):92-102
37. Marotta JJ, Goodale MA (1998) The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping. Exp Brain Res 121:465-470
38. Marotta JJ, Behrmann M, Goodale MA (1997) The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Exp Brain Res 116:113-121
39. Melmoth DR, Grant S (2006) Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 171:371-388
40. Melmoth DR, Storoni M, Todd G, Finlay AL, Grant S (2007) Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 183:283-298
41. Milgram P (1987) A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 19:449-456
42. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Mon-Williams M, Tresilian JR, McIntosh R, Milner AD (2001) Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III). Exp Brain Res 139:127-136
44. Morgan MJ (1979) Perception of continuity in stroboscopic motion: a temporal frequency analysis. Vision Res 19:491-500
45. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburg Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-112
46. Ogle KN (1963) Stereoscopic depth perception and exposure delay between images to the two eyes. J Opt Soc Am 53:1296-1304
47. Olivier I, Weeks DJ, Lyons J, Ricker KL, Elliot D (1998) Monocular and binocular vision in one-hand ball catching: interocular integration. J Mot Behav 30(4):343-351
48. Parker A (2007) Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:379-391
49. Patla AE, Ishac MG, Winter DA (2002) Anticipatory control of center of mass and joint stability during voluntary arm movement from a standing posture: interplay between active and passive control. Exp Brain Res 143:318-327
50. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152(3):341-352
51. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2004) Visual feedback control of hand movements. J Neurosci 24(13):3223-34
52. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2005) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 162(4):458-473
53. Servos P (2000) Disatnce estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems. Exp Brain Res 130:35-47
54. Servos P, Goodale MA (1994) Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 98(1):119-127
55. Servos P, Goodale MA (1998) Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements. Exp Brain Res 119:92-102
56. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS (1992) The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32:1513-1521
57. Tresilian JR, Mon-Williams M, Kelly BM (1999) Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:39-44
58. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 549-586
59. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2000) Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 38(11):1473-81
60. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF (2003) The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(2):404-415
61. Watt SJ, Keefe B, Hibbard P (2007) Do binocular cues to depth have a special role in grasping? Vision Sci Soc 263
62. Westwood DA, Goodale MA (2003) Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spat Vis 16:243-254
63. Wist ER, Gogel WC (1966) The effect of interocular delay and repetition interval on depth perception. Vision Res 6:325-334