Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 504-514

  Hartung, Bruce ^a   Schrater, Paul R ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^b   Kersten, Daniel ^c   Franz, Volker H ^b,d  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Haptic feedback; Hollow face illusion; Reaching; Visual motor control

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 27244457910     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/5.6.2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5 (6), 679-685.
2. Belhumeur, P., Kriegman, D., & Yuille, A. (1999). The bas-relief ambiguity. International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(1), 33-44.
3. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. SIGGRAPH'99 Conference Proceedings, 187-194.
4. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
5. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
6. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 456-469.
7. Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 379-382.
8. Bülthoff, H. H., & Yuille, A. L. (1996). A Bayesian framework for the integration of visual modules. In J. McClelland & T. Inui (Eds.), Attention & performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 49-70). Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Clark, J. J., & Yuille, A. L. (1990) Data fusion for sensory information processing systems, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 109-113.
11. Dassonville, P., & Bala, J. K. (2004). Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation. PLoS Biology, 2(11), 1936-1945.
12. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(4), 162-169.
13. Fikes, T. G., Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1994). Effects of object texture on precontact movement time in human prehension. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 325-332.
14. Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(11), 457-459.
15. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11(1), 20-25.
16. Geisler, W. S., & Kersten, D. (2002). Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 508-510.
17. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(7), 288-292.
18. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Keillor, J. M. (1994). Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1159-1178.
19. Gordon, A. M., Westling, G., Cole, K. J., & Johansson, R. S. (1993). Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1789-1796.
20. Goodale, M. A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 203-211.
21. Gregory, R. L. (1973). The confounded eye. In R. L. Gregory & E. H. Gombrich (Eds.), Illusion in nature and art (pp. 49-96). London: Duckworth.
22. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). The effect of learned perceptual associations on visuomotor programming varies with kinematic demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 950-964.
23. Hartung, B., Franz, V. H., Kersten, D., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). Is the motor system affected by the hollow face illusion? [Abstract] Journal of Vision, 1(3), 256a, http://journalofvision.org/1/3/256/, doi:10.1167/1.3.256.
24. Hespanha, J., Dodds, Z., Hager, G. D., & Morse, A. S. (1999). What tasks can be performed with an uncalibrated stereo vision system? The International Journal of Computer Vision, 35(1), 65-85.
25. Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1993). Independent effects of lighting, orientation, and stereopsis on the hollow-face illusion. Perception, 22, 887-897.
26. Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1994). A comparison between the hollow-face and 'hollow-potato' illusions. Perception, 23, 1335-1337.
27. Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 986-1004.
28. Kroliczak, G., Heard, P., Goodale, M. A., & Gregory R. L. (in press). Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Cognitive Brain Research.
29. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. J. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion, Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
30. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., & Young, M. J. (1991). Psychophysical estimation of the human depth combination rule. Proceedings of the SPIE, 1383, 247-254.
31. Langer, M. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception, 30, 403-410.
32. Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (1989). A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. Proceedings of the SPIE, 1199, 1154-1163.
33. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
34. Pavani, F., Boscagli, I., Benvenuti, F., Rabuffetti, M., & Farne, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
35. Schrater, P. R., & Kersten, D. (2000). How optimal depth cue integration depends on the task. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40(1), 73-91.
36. Schunck, B. G. (1989). Robust estimation of image flow. Proceedings of the APIE, 1198, 116-127.
37. Sinha, S. S., & Schunck, B. G. (1992). A two stage algorithm for discontinuity-preserving surface reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14, 36-55.
38. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2001). Action beyond our grasp. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(7), 287.
39. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
40. Yuille, A. L., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. In D. Knill & W. Richards (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 123-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. van Donkelaar, P. (1999). Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Experimental Brain Research, 125(4), 517-520.