Collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer-mediated communication groups: Testing the influence of social context using social network analysis

Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 548-573

  Cho, Hichang ^a   Lee, Jae Shin ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

analysis; Computer mediated communication; Information seeking; Multivariate p; National culture; Outcome expectancy; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 46249084052     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650208315982     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p* primer: Logit models for social networks. Social Networks, 21, 37-66.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Banks, S., & Riley, P. (1993). Structuration theory as an ontology for communication research. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 167-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Barley, S.R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 61-103.
6. Berends, H., Boersma, K., &. Weggeman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56 (9). 1035-1056.
7. Bikson, T., Eveland, J.D., & Gutek, B.A. (1989). Flexible interactive technologies for multi-person tasks: Current problems and future prospects. In M. H. Olson (Ed.), Technological support for work group collaboration (pp. 89-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Bond, M.H., & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
9. Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49 (4). 432-445.
10. Brandon, D.P., & Hollingshead, A.B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15 (6). 633-644.
11. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Calhoun, K.J., Teng, J.T.C., & Cheon, M.J. (2002). Impact of national culture on information technology usage behavior: An exploratory study of decision making in Korea and the USA. Behavior & Information Technology, 21 (4). 293-302.
13. Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. (2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication, technology and society: New media adoption and uses (pp. 379-407). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
14. Chee, W.C., Harrison, G.L., McKinnon, J.L., & Wu, A. (1999). Cultural influences on informal information sharing in Chinese and Anglo-American organizations: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24 (7). 561-582.
15. Cho, H., Lee, J., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2005). Development of computer-supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24 (6). 435-448.
16. Chow, C.W., Deng, F.J., & Ho, J.L. (2000). The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: A comparative study of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 65-96.
17. Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23 (2). 145-158.
18. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: On the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7 (2). 119-135.
19. Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 3 (2). 100-120.
20. DeSanctis, G. (1993). Shifting foundations in group support systems research. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 97-111). New York: Macmillan.
21. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advance technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5 (2). 121-147.
22. De Vries, R.E., Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33 (2). 115-135.
23. Eastin, M.A., & LaRose, R.L. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Retrieved November 29, 2000, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/ eastin.html
24. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W.A. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (1). 59-83.
25. Espinosa, J.A., DeLone, W., & Lee, G. (2006). Global boundaries, task processes, and IS project success: A field study. Information Technology and People, 19 (4). 345-370.
26. Evans, J., & Brooks, L. (2005). Understanding collaboration using new technologies: A structural perspective. The Information Society, 20, 215-220.
27. Flanagin, A.J. (2000). Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Human Communication Research, 26, 618-646.
28. Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (5). 921-950.
29. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C.W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (1999). The dark side of social capital. In R. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 298-322). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
31. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
33. Hammer, M. (1979 / 1980). Predictability of social connections over time. Social Networks, 2, 165-180.
34. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill International.
36. Hollingshead, A.B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
37. Hollingshead, A.B. (2000). Perceptions of expertise in and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 3, 257-267.
38. Hsu, M.H., Ju, T., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C.M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in a virtual community: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 153-169.
39. Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31 (1). 60-73.
40. Katz, R., & Allen, T.J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12 (1). 7-19.
41. Kraut, R.E., Rice, R.E., Cool, C., & Fish, R.S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9 (4). 437-453.
42. LaRose, R., Mastro, D.A., & Eastin, M.S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395-413.
43. Lau, D., & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2). 325-340.
44. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making [Special issue: Computer supported cooperative work and groupware]. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
45. Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K.M., & Wynn, E. (2006). How does virtuality affect team performance in a global organization? Understanding the impact of variety of practices. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9 (1). 4-23.
46. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWorks and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205-242.
50. O'Reilly, C. (1982). Variations in decision maker's use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25 (4). 756-771.
51. Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3). 398-417.
52. Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13 (3). 249-273.
53. Palazzolo, E.T. (2005). Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 32, 726-761.
54. Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks, II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 169-194.
55. Pearce, W.G. (1976). The coordinated management of meeting: A rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 17-35). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Peters, L.D. (2006). Conceptualizing computer-mediated communication technology and its use in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 26 (2). 142-152.
57. Polzer, J.T., Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Kim, J.W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4). 679-692.
58. Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59. Poole, M.S., Seibold, D.R., & McPhee, R.D. (1985). Group decision making as a structuration process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71 (February), 74-101.
60. Ramirez, A., Walther, J., Burgoon, J.K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategy, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28 (2). 213-228.
61. Redding, S.G., & Wong, G.Y.Y. (1986). The psychology of Chinese organisational behaviour. In M. Bond (Ed.), Psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
62. Reddy, M., & Dourish, P. (2002). A finger on the pulse: Temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. Unpublished proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 16-20, New Orleans, LA, pp. 343-353.
63. Rice, R., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2). 219-244.
64. Richards, W.D., & Seary, A.J. (2005). MultiNet for Windows (Version 4.74). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
65. Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
66. Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Smith, M. (2002). Tools for navigating large social cyberspaces. Communications of the ACM, 45 (4). 51-55.
69. Smith, P.B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.
70. Sonnenwald, D.H., & Pierce, L.G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing and Management, 36 (3). 461-447.
71. Stafford, T.F., Stafford, M.R., & Schkade, L.L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decision Sciences, 35 (2). 259-288.
72. Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudo-likelihood estimation for social networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204-212.
73. Tan, B., Wei, K., Watson, R.T., Clapper, D.L., & Mclean, E.R. (1998). Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44 (9). 1263-1279.
74. Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R., & Daft, R.L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organization: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
75. Triandis, H.C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 41-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76. Triandis, H.C. (2003). Forty-five years of researching the culture and behavior link: An intellectual autobiography. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Cross-cultural management: Foundations and future (pp. 11-28). Aldershot, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
77. Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. London: Basil-Blackwell.
78. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24 (1). 115-139.
79. Walther, J.B., Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L.C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
80. Wasko, M.M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1). 35-58.
81. Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P.E. (1996). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks, I. An introduction to Markov random graphs and p. Psychometrika, 60, 401-425.
82. Watson, R.T., Ho, T.H., & Raman, K.S. (1994). Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems. Communications of the ACM, 37 (10). 44-55.
83. Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K., & Crowston, K. (2002). Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information, Technology & People, 15 (3). 191-209.
84. Wegner, D.M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In M. B. & G. G. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer-Verlag.
85. Wegner, D.M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (6). 923-929.
86. Wellman, B., Hass, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436-455.
87. Yuan, Y.C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34, 131-155.
88. Zack, M.H., & McKenney, J.L. (1998). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. In G. DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 247-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.