Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representations

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 162-173

  Mineo, Beth ^a   Peischl, Denise ^b   Pennington, Christopher ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b NEMOURS ALFRED I DUPONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^c AgoraNet Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Graphics; Language Comprehension; Language Representation

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; KETONES;

(I ,J) CONDITIONS; ACTION REPRESENTATIONS; DYNAMIC REPRESENTATIONS; GRAPHICAL FORMS; MOVING TARGETS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC; WORD REPRESENTATIONS;

PHOTOACOUSTIC EFFECT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMANS; INFANT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 45849094743     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: 14773848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07434610802109915     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006) DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, pp. 183-198.
2. Ainsworth, S. and VanLabeke, N. (2004) Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 241-255.
3. Bloom, L. (1970) Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Bloom, L. (1991) Language development from two to three, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Bloom, L. and Lahey, M. (1978) Language development and language disorders, John Wiley and Sons, New York
6. Brady, N. and McLean, L. (1998) Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, pp. 409-421.
7. Callaghan, T. C. (2000) Factors affecting graphic symbol understanding in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development, 15, pp. 207-236.
8. Catrambone, R. and Seay, A. F. (2002) Using animation to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors, 44, pp. 495-511.
9. ChanLin, L. (2000) Attributes of animation for learning scientific knowledge. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, pp. 228-238.
10. Cook, M. P. (2006) Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90, pp. 1073-1091.
11. DeLoache, J. S. and Burns, N. M. (1994) Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, pp. 83-110.
12. DeLoache, J. S., Mendoza, O. A. P. and Anderson, K. M. (1999) Multiple factors in early symbol use: Instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development, 14, pp. 299-312.
13. DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L. and Troseth, G. L. (1996) The three R's of pictorial competence. Annals of Child Development, 12, pp. 1-48.
14. Dixon, L. (1981) A functional analysis of photo-object matching skills or severely retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, pp. 465-478.
15. Downs, E. and Jenkins, S. J. (2001) The effects of grade level, type of motion, cueing strategy, pictorial complexity, and color on children's interpretation of implied motion in pictures. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, pp. 229-242.
16. Dunn, L. M. and Dunn, L. M. (1997) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, American Guidance Service, Inc, Circle Pines, MN
17. Franklin, K., Mirenda, P. and Phillips, G. (1996) Comparison of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, pp. 63-77.
18. Friedman, S. and Stevenson, M. (1975) Developmental changes in the understanding of implied motion in two-dimensional pictures. Child Development, 46, pp. 773-778.
19. Goldman, S. R. (2003) Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help. Learning and Instruction, 13, pp. 239-244.
20. Goldstein, L. H. and Oakley, D. A. (1986) Color versus orientation discrimination in severely brain-damaged and normal adults. Cortex, 22, pp. 261-266.
21. Gross, D., Soken, N., Rosengren, K. S., Pick, A. D., Pillow, B. H. and Melendez, P. (1991) Children's understanding of action lines and the static representation of speed of locomotion. Child Development, 62, pp. 1124-1141.
22. Hegarty, M. (2004) Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 343-351.
23. Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P. and Charney, R. (1983) Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, pp. 72-93.
24. Jagaroo, V. and Wilkinson, K. (2008) Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, pp. 29-42.
25. Kose, G., Beilin, H. and O'Connor, J. (1983) Children's comprehension of actions depicted in photographs. Developmental Psychology, 19, pp. 636-643.
26. Kozma, R. (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13, pp. 205-226.
27. Leonard, L. (1976) Meaning in child language, Grune and Stratton, New York
28. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1991) Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition, 41, pp. 123-151.
29. Lowe, R. (2004) Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 257-274.
30. Lowe, R. and Pramono, H. (2006) Using graphics to support comprehension of dynamic information in texts. Information Design Journal, 14, pp. 22-34.
31. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S. and Campbell, J. (2005) When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, pp. 256-265.
32. McDougall, S. J. P., De Bruijn, O. and Curry, M. B. (2000) Exploring the effects of icon characteristics on user performance: The role of icon concreteness, complexity, & distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, pp. 291-306.
33. Mineo, Mollica B. (2003) Representational competence. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC, pp. 107-146. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore
34. Mirenda, P. and Locke, P. A. (1989) A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, pp. 131-140.
35. Molinari, G. and Tapiero, I. (2007) Integration of new domain-related states and events from texts and illustrations by subjects with high and low prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 17, pp. 304-321.
36. Park, O. and Hopkins, R. (1993) Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional Science, 21, pp. 427-449.
37. Petre, M. and Green, T. R. G. (1993) Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4, pp. 55-70.
38. Ploetzner, R. and Lowe, R. (2004) Dynamic visualizations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 235-240.
39. Ramer, A. (1976) Syntactic styles in emerging language. Journal of Child Language, 3, pp. 48-62.
40. Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A. and Adamson, L. B. (1997) Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, pp. 172-178.
41. Rosenblum, L. D., Saldana, H. M. and Carello, C. (1993) Dynamical constraints on pictorial action lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, pp. 381-396.
42. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P. and Catrambone, R. (2006) Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, pp. 9-25.
43. Sevcik, R. A. and Romski, M. A. (1986) Representational matching skills of persons with severe retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, pp. 160-164.
44. Stevenson, M. B. and Friedman, S. L. (1986) Developmental changes in the understanding of pictorial representations of sound. Developmental Psychology, 22, pp. 686-690.
45. Travers, R. and Alvarado, V. (1970) The design of pictures for children in elementary school. AV Communication Review, 10, pp. 47-64.
46. Troseth, G. L. (2003) Getting a clear picture: Young children's understanding of a televised image. Developmental Science, 6, pp. 247-253.
47. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B. and Betrancourt, M. (2002) Animation: Can it facilitate. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, pp. 247-262.
48. Uttal, D. J., Scudder, K. V. and DeLoache, J. S. (1997) Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, pp. 37-54.
49. Van der Meij, J. and deJong, T. (2006) Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulations-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, pp. 199-212.