Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 202-210

  Langhoff, J D ^a   Mayer, J ^b   Faber, L ^c   Kaestner, S B ^a   Guibert, G ^d   Zlinszky, K ^a   Auer, J A ^a   Von Rechenberg, Birgitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b TECIM Technologies for Implants and Materials   (Switzerland)

^c Johnson Johnson Company   (Switzerland)

^d HES SO Arc   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anodised implants; Bone implant bonding; Removal torque; Sheep; Titanium

Indexed keywords

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 45449119910     PISSN: 09320814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617362     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Walczak J, Shahgaldi F, Heatley F. In vivo corrosion of 316L stainless-steel hip implants: morphology and elemental compositions of corrosion products. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 229-237.
2. Steinemann SG. Titanium-the material of choice? Periodontol 2000 1998; 17: 7-21.
3. Delplancke JL, Winand R. Galvanostatic anodization of titanium. 1. Structures and compositions of the anodic films. Electrochimica Acta 1988; 33: 1539-1549.
4. Aladjem A. Anodic oxidation of titanium and its alloys. J Mater Sci 1973; 8: 688-704.
5. Reclaru L, Lerf R, Eschler PY et al. Evaluation of corrosion on plasma sprayed and anodized titanium implants, both with and without bone cement. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3027-3038.
6. Rodriguez R, Kim K., Ong JL. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003; 65: 352-358.
7. Son WW, Zhu X, Shin HI et al. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized/hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003; 66: 520-525.
8. Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implants with a porous anodized surface with at least 36 months of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006; 8: 169-177.
9. Pienkowski D, Stephens GC, Doers TM et al. Multicycle mechanical performance of titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants. Spine 1998; 23: 782-788.
10. Lee TK, Haynes RJ, Longo JA et al. Pin removal in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the unsuitability of titanium devices. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 16: 49-52.
11. Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Deligianni D et al. Effectiveness of transfixation and length of instrumentation on titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants. J Spinal Disord 2001; 14: 109-117.
12. Gerber I, Koch S, Zehnder T et al. Effects of TiMAX™ on growth and differentiation of human osteoblastlike cells under serum-free culture conditions. European Cells and Materials 2005; 10: 6.
13. Haidukewych G, Sems SA, Huebner D et al. Results of polyaxial locked-plate fixation of periarticular fractures of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 614-620.
14. Burks JB, Comerford JS, Buk A. Additional uses of the DePuy TiMAX Spider Plate. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003; 93: 406-407; author reply 7.
15. Lausmaa J. Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 1996; 81: 343-361.
16. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G et al. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 1998; 139: 663-670.
17. Guibert G, Munnik F, Langhoff JD et al. Study of new sheep bone and Zn/Ca ratio around TiAlV screw: PIXE-RBS analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2008.
18. Nunamaker D, Perren S. Experimental models of fracture repair. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 56-65.
19. Theiss F, Apelt D, Brand B et al. Biocompatibility and resorption of a brushite calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4383-4394.
20. El-Warrak AO, Olmstead M, Schneider R et al. An experimental animal model of aseptic loosening of hip prostheses in sheep to study early biochemical changes at the interface membrane. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 7.
21. Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG et al. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 105-111.
22. Fini M, Nicoli Aldini N, Torricelli P et al. A new austenitic stainless steel with negligible nickel content: an in vitro and in vivo comparative investigation. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4929-4939.
23. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 537-552.
24. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S et al. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2004; 15: 401-412.
25. Ungersbock A, Pohler OEM, Perren SM. Evaluation of soft tissue reactions at the interface of titanium limited contact dynamic compression plate implants with different surface treatments: an experimental sheep study. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 797-806.
26. Rocca M, Fini M, Giavaresi G et al. Tibial implants: biomechanical and histomorphometric studies of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated stainless steel and titanium screws in long-term ovariectomized sheep. Int J Artif Organs 2001; 24: 649-654.
27. Fini M, Savarino L, Nicoli Aldini N et al. Bio-mechanical and histomorphometric investigations on two morphologically differing titanium surfaces with and without fluorohydroxyapatite coating: an experimental study in sheep tibiae. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3183-3192.
28. Seligson D, Mehta S, Mishra AK et al. In vivo study of stainless steel and Ti-13Nb-13Zr bone plates in a sheep model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997: 213-223.
29. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T et al. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 486-494.
30. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA et al. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 496-500.
31. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4759-4766.
32. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1837-1847.
33. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 536-543.