Intervertebral disc cell mechanics and biological responses to load

Current Opinion in Orthopaedics

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 331-340

  Setton, Lori A ^a   Chen, Jun ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell mechanics; Degeneration; Intervertebral disc; Mechanical properties; Mechanobiology; Morphology

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE;

ANNULUS FIBROSUS; BIOMECHANICS; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPRESSION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; INFLAMMATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS PULPOSUS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TENSION; VIBRATION; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 4544266093     PISSN: 10419918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bco.0000134822.79609.c6     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Urban JP, Roberts S: Development and degeneration of the intervertebral discs. Mol Med Today 1995, 1:329-335.
2. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice DP: Back and other joint pain. In Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. Edited by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1999:27-33.
3. Ala-Kokko L: Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med 2002, 34:42-47.
4. Lotz JC, Hsieh AH, Walsh AL, et al.: Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc. Biochem Soc Trans 2002, 30:853-858.
5. Urban JP: The role of the physicochemical environment in determining disc cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans 2002, 30:858-864.
6. th ed. Edited by Jayson MIV. Churchill Livingstone; 1992:111-131.
7. Oegema TRJ: Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. Clin Sports Med 1993, 12:419-439.
8. Nachemson A: Lumbar mechanics as revealed by lumbar intradiscal pressure measurements. In The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, 4th ed. Edited by Jayson MIV. Churchill Livingstone; 1992:157-171.
9. Urban JP, Maroudas A: Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 1981, 9:1-10.
10. Butler WF, Fujioka T: Fine structure of the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc of the cat. Anat Anz 1972, 132:465-475.
11. Hunter CJ, Matyas JR, Duncan NA: The three-dimensional architecture of the notochordal nucleus pulposus: novel observations on cell structures in the canine intervertebral disc. J Anat 2003, 202:279-291.
12. Meachim G, Cornah MS: Fine structure of juvenile human nucleus pulposus. J Anat 1970, 107:337-350.
13. Taylor JR, Twomey LT: The development of the human intervertebral disc. In The Biology of the Intervertebral Disc, vol 1. Edited by Ghosh P. CRC Press; 1988:39-82.
14. Trout JJ, Buckwalter JA, Moore KC, Landas SK: Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc: I. Changes in notochordal cells with age. Tissue Cell 1982, 14:359-369.
15. Trout JJ, Buckwalter JA, Moore KC: Ultrastructure of the human intervertebral disc: II. Cells of the nucleus pulposus. Anat Rec 1982, 204:307-314.
16. Kim KW, Lim TH, Kim JG, et al.: The origin of chondrocytes in the nucleus pulposus and histologic findings associated with the transition of a notochordal nucleus pulposus to a fibrocartilaginous nucleus pulposus in intact rabbit intervertebral discs. Spine 2003, 28:982-990.
17. Johnson WE, Roberts S: Human intervertebral disc cell morphology and cytoskeletal composition: a preliminary study of regional variations in health and disease. J Anat 2003, 203:605-612. This study documents the existence of F-actin and vimentin containing cell processes in cells derived from patients with discogenic back pain and scoliosis. A pattern towards increased cell processes in scoliotic cells, but not those from painful discs, was reported. The mechanical and biological function of these processes remains unknown.
18. Errington RJ, Puustjarvi K, White IR, et al.: Characterisation of cytoplasm-filled processes in cells of the intervertebral disc. J Anat 1998, 192:369-378.
19. Benjamin M, Archer CW, Ralphs JR: Cytoskeleton of cartilage cells. Microsc Res Tech 1994, 28:372-377.
20. Eggli PS, Hunziker EB, Schenk RK: Quantitation of structural features characterizing weight- and less-weight-bearing regions in articular cartilage: a stereological analysis of medial femoral condyles in young adult rabbits. Anat Rec 1988, 222:217-227.
21. Coventry NB, Ghormley RK, Kernohan JW: The intervertebral disc - its microscopic anatomy and pathology - Part I: Anatomy, development and physiology. J Bone Joint Surg 1945, 27A:105-112.
22. Marchand F, Ahmed A: Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc annulus fibrosus. Spine 1990, 15:402-410,
23. Cassidy JJ, Hiltner A, Baer E: Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect Tissue Res 1989, 23:75-88.
24. Hickey DS, Hukins DWL: X-ray diffraction studies of the arrangement of collagenous fibres in human fetal intervertebral disc. J Anat 1980, 131:81-90.
25. Horton WG: Further observations on the elastic mechanism of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg 1958, 40-B:552-557.
26. Nachemson A: Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1960, 43:1-103.
27. Higuchi M, Abe K: Postmortem changes in ultrastructures of the mouse intervertebral disc. Spine 1987, 12:48-52.
28. Postacchini F, Bellocci M, Massobrio M: Morphologic changes in anulus fibrosus during aging: An ultrastructural study in rats. Spine 1984, 9:596-603.
29. Rufai A, Benjamin M, Ralphs JR: The development of fibrocartilage in the rat intervertebral disc. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1995, 192:53-62.
30. Urban JP, Roberts S: Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 2003, 5:120-130. An excellent review of the factors that may regulate disc metabolism with an emphasis on cell metabolism and nutrient transport in disc degeneration.
31. Baer AE, Laursen TA, Guilak F, Setton LA: The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells determined by a finite deformation, anisotropic, and biphasic finite element model. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:1-11. An early modeling study that predicted mechanical stimuli that may be experienced by cells within the intervertebral disc.
32. Bruehlmann SB, Rattner JB, Matyas JR, Duncan NA: Regional variations in the cellular matrix of the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. J Anat 2002, 201:159-171.
33. Roberts S: Disc morphology in health and disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2002, 30:864-869.
34. Baer AE: The Micromechanical Environment of Intervertebral Disc Cells. Durham, NC: Duke University; 2001.
35. Roberts S, Menage J, Duance V, Wotton SF: Type III collagen in the intervertebral disc. Histochem J 1991, 23:503-508.
36. Roberts S, Menage J, Duance V, et al.: Collagen types around the cells of the intervertebral disc and cartilage end plate: an immunolocalization study. Spine 1991, 16:1030-1038.
37. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, et al.: Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 2002, 27:2631-2644.
38. Johnson WE, Eisenstein SM, Roberts S: Cell cluster formation in degenerate lumbar intervertebral discs is associated with increased disc cell proliferation. Connect Tissue Res 2001, 42:197-207.
39. Johnson WE, Evans H, Menage J, et al.: Immunohistochemical detection of Schwann cells in innervated and vascularized human intervertebral discs. Spine 2001, 26:2550-2557.
40. Crean JK, Roberts S, Jaffray DC, et al.: Matrix metalloproteinases in the human intervertebral disc: role in disc degeneration and scoliosis. Spine 1997, 22:2877-2884.
41. Roberts S, Caterson B, Menage J, et al.: Matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase: their role in disorders of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 2000, 25:3005-3013.
42. Kang JD, Stefanovic-Racic M, McIntyre LA, et al.: Toward a biochemical understanding of human intervertebral disc degeneration and herniation. Contributions of nitric oxide, interleukins, prostaglandin E2, and matrix metalloproteinases. Spine 1997, 22:1065-1073.
43. Goupille P, Jayson MI, Valat JP, Freemont AJ: Matrix metalloproteinases: the clue to intervertebral disc degeneration? Spine 1998, 23:1612-1626.
44. Weiler C, Nerlich AG, Zipperer J, et al.: Expression of major matrix metalloproteinases is associated with intervertebral disc degradation and resorption. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:308-320.
45. Burke JG, Watson RW, McCormack D, et al.: Spontaneous production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin-8 by the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 2002, 27:1402-1407.
46. Burke JG, Watson RW, McCormack D, et al.: Intervertebral discs which cause low back pain secrete high levels of proinflammaiory mediators. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:196-201.
47. Kang JD, Georgescu HI, McIntyre-Larkin L, et al.: Herniated lumbar intervertebral discs spontaneously produce matrix metalloproteinases, nitric oxide, interleukin-6, prostaglandin E2. Spine 1996, 21:271-277.
48. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Stromberg J, et al.: Inflammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine 1995, 20:665-669.
49. Weidenbaum M, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, et al.: Mechanical behaviors of the intervertebral disc and the effects of degeneration. In Low Back Pain: A Scientific and Clinical Overview. Edited by Weinstein JN, Gordon SL. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1996:557-582.
50. Best BA, Guilak F, Setton LA, et al.: Compressive mechanical properties of the human anulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. Spine 1994, 19:212-221.
51. Gu WY, Mao XG, Foster RJ, et al.: The anisotropic hydraulic permeability of human lumbar anulus fibrosus: Influence of age, degeneration, direction, and water content. Spine 1999, 24:2449-2455.
52. Houben GB, Drost MR, Huyghe JM, et al.: Nonhomogeneous permeability of canine anulus fibrosus. Spine 1997, 22:7-16.
53. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, et al.: Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech 1998, 31:535-544.
54. Yao H, Justiz MA, Flagler D, Gu WY: Effects of swelling pressure and hydraulic permeability on dynamic compressive behavior of lumbar annulus fibrosus. Ann Biomed Eng 2002, 30:1234-1241.
55. Drost MR, Willems P, Snijders H, et al.: Confined compression of canine anulus fibrosus under chemical and mechanical loading. J Biomech Eng 1995, 117:390-396.
56. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC: The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J Biomech 1997, 30:1005-1013.
57. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC: Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging. J Orthop Res 1997, 15:318-322.
58. Gu WY, Yao H: Effects of hydration and fixed charge density on fluid transport in charged hydrated soft tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31:1162-1170.
59. Iatridis JC, Laible JP, Krag MH: Influence of fixed charge density magnitude and distribution on the intervertebral disc: applications of a poroelastic and chemical electric (PEACE) model. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:12-24.
60. Gu WY, Mao XG, Rawlins BA, et al.: Streaming potential of human lumbar anulus fibrosus is anisotropic and affected by disc degeneration. J Biomech 1999, 32:1177-1182.
61. Huyghe JM, Houben GB, Drost MR, van Donkelaar CC: An ionised/non-ionised dual porosity model of intervertebral disc tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2003, 2:3-19.
62. Guilak F, Tlng-Beall HP, Baer AE, et al.: Viscoelastic properties of intervertebral disc cells. Identification of two biomechanically distinct cell populations. Spine 1999, 24:2475-2483.
63. Knight MM, Ross JM, Sherwin AF, et al.: Chondrocyte deformation within mechanically and enzymatically extracted chondrons compressed in agarose. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001, 1526:141-146.
64. Knight MM, Ghori SA, Lee DA, Bader DL: Measurement of the deformation of isolated chondrocytes in agarose subjected to cyclic compression. Med Eng Phys 1998, 20:684-688.
65. Alexopoulos LG, Haider MA, Vail TP, Guilak F: Alterations in the mechanical properties of the human chondrocyte pericellular matrix with osteoarthritis. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:323-333.
66. Nettles DL, Richardson WJ, Setton LA: Integrin expression in cells of the intervertebral disc. J Anat 2004, 203:(in press). This study provides the first description of integrin subunit expression in intervertebral disc tissues of the human and porcine spines.
67. Meakin JR, Hukins DWL: Effect of removing the nucleus pulposus on the deformation of the anulus fibrosus during compression of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2000, 33:575-580.
68. Seroussi RE, Krag MH, Muller DL, Pope MH: Internal deformations of intact and denucleated human lumbar discs subjected to compression, flexion and extensions loads:. J Orthop Res 1989, 7:122-131.
69. Stokes IAF: Surface strain on human intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res 1987, 5:348-355.
70. Bruehlmann SB, Hulme PA, Duncan NA: In situ intercellular mechanics of the bovine outer annulus fibrosus subjected to biaxial strains. J Biomech 2004, 37:223-231. This study provides the first documentation of cell movements within the extracellular matrix of the intervertebral disc. Results indicate that cell movements may be far more complex than originally thought, with evidence of cell translations, rotations, and movements of cell processes relative to the cell body.
71. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P: 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78:965-972.
72. Freeman PM, Natarajan RN, Kimura JH, Andriacchi TP: Chondrocyte cells respond mechanically to compressive loads. J Orthop Res 1994, 12:311-320.
73. Guilak F, Mow VC: The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: A biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J Biomech 2000, 33:1663-1673.
74. Wu JZ, Herzog W, Epstein M: Modelling of location- and time-dependent deformation of chondrocytes during cartilage loading. J Biomech 1999, 32:563-572.
75. Baer AE, Setton LA: The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells: effect of matrix anisotropy and cell geometry predicted by a linear model. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122:245-251.
76. Bayliss MT, Urban JP, Johnstone B, Holm S: In vitro method for measuring synthesis rates in the intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1986, 4:10-17.
77. Chen J, Baer AE, Paik PY, et al.: Matrix protein gene expression in intervertebral disc cells subjected to altered osmolarity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002, 293:932-938.
78. Ishihara H, Warensjo K, Roberts S, Urban JP: Proteoglycan synthesis in the intervertebral disk nucleus: the role of extracellular osmolality. Am J Physiol 1997, 272:C1499-C1506.
79. Pritchard S, Erickson GR, Guilak F: Hyperosmotically induced volume change and calcium signaling in intervertebral disk cells: the role of the actin cytoskeleton. Biophys J 2002, 83:2502-2510.
80. Laible JP, Pflaster DS, Krag MH, et al.: A poroelastic-swelling finite element model with application to the intervertebral disc. Spine 1993, 18:659-670.
81. Simon BR, Liable JP, Pflaster D, et al.: A poroalastic finite element formulation including transport and swelling in soft tissue structures. J Biomech Eng 1996, 118:1-9.
82. Ariga K, Yonenobu K, Nakase T, et al.: Mechanical stress-induced apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes in organ-cultured mouse intervertebral discs: an ex vivo study. Spine 2003, 28:1528-1533.
83. Hutton WC, Toribatake Y, Elmer WA, et al.: The effect of compressive force applied to the intervertebral disc in vivo - A study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 1998, 23:2524-2537.
84. Iatridis JC, Mente PL, Stokes IAF, et al.: Compression-induced changes in intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model. Spine 1999, 24:996-1002.
85. Lotz JC, Chin JR: Intervertebral disc cell death is dependent on the magnitude and duration of spinal loading. Spine 2000, 25:1477-1483.
86. Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al.: 1998 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies-Compression-induced degeneration of the intervertebral disc: An in vivo mouse model and finite-element study. Spine 1998, 23:2493-2506.
87. Ohshima H, Urban JP, Bergel DH: Effect of static load on matrix synthesis rates in the intervertebral disc measured in vitro by a new perfusion technique. J Orthop Res 1995, 13:22-29.
88. Hsieh AH, Lotz JC: Prolonged spinal loading induces matrix metalloproteinase-2 activation in intervertebral discs. Spine 2003, 28:1781-1788. An early study documenting that protease activity can increase in response to compression of the motion segment in an animal model.
89. Chen J, Yan W, Setton LA: Static compression induces zonal-specific changes in gene expression for extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal proteins in intervertebral disc cells in vitro. Matrix Biol 2004, 22:573-583. An early study of isolated cell responses to compression in vitro and at the gene expression level, which demonstrate some patterns that are similar and some that are not, to those reported for posttranslational biosynthesis in explants. The observed dissimilarities likely reflect differences in their mechanical, biochemical, and physicochemical environments.
90. MacLean JJ, Lee CR, Grad S, et al.: Effects of immobilization and dynamic compression on intervertebral disc cell gene expression in vivo. Spine 2003, 28:973-981. This is one of the first studies to point towards the importance of changes in genes encoding catabolic proteins (proteases), and their differential regulation as compared to anabolic proteins (extracellular matrix proteins), in response to dynamic compressive stimuli.
91. Walsh AJ, Lotz JC: Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading. J Biomech 2004, 37:329-337. This study is important for revealing that cell responses to dynamic loading, particularly cell death and proteoglycan content, are dependent on both the frequency and magnitude of the applied stress. The lower frequency and higher peak stress magnitudes induced the greatest increases in proteoglycan content and cell death that may relate to the higher deformations that occur under these conditions.
92. Rannou F, Lee TS, Zhou RH, et al.: Intervertebral disc degeneration: the role of the mitochondrial pathway in annulus fibrosus cell apoptosis induced by overload. Am J Pathol 2004, 164:915-924. This is one of the first studies to examine a mechanism for the observation of cell death following compression loading. The authors show that the mechanical overload-induced IVD degeneration is mediated through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in IVD cells.
93. Kawakami M, Hashizume H, Nishi H, et al.: Comparison of neuropathic pain induced by the application of normal and mechanically compressed nucleus pulposus to lumbar nerve roots in the rat. J Orthop Res 2003, 21:535-539. This study, and that from this group of investigators, is important for the links between compression load and pain that are revealed. When the mechanically compressed nucleus pulposus tissue was transplanted to the rat nerve roots, the animals experienced a decreased sensitization to pain, providing some of the first evidence that mechanical stimuli have the potential to regulate the perception of pain.
94. Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, et al.: Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 1997, 22:1085-1091.
95. Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, Hall AC: Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 1996, 80:839-846.
96. Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Bryce LM, et al.: Do the intervertebral disc cells respond to different levels of hydrostatic pressure? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001, 16:728-734.
97. Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Boden SD, et al.: The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine 1999, 24:1507-1515.
98. Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, et al.: Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 2003, 21:597-603.
99. Liu GZ, Ishihara H, Osada R, et al.: Nitric oxide mediates the change of proteoglycan synthesis in the human lumbar intervertebral disc in response to hydrostatic pressure. Spine 2001, 26:134-141.
100. Hutton WC, Yoon ST, Elmer WA, et al.: Effect of tail suspension (or simulated weightlessness) on the lumbar intervertebral disc: study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 2002, 27:1286-1290.
101. Court C, Colliou OK, Chin JR, et al.: The effect of static in vivo bending on the murine intervertebral disc. Spine J 2001, 1:239-245.
102. Terahata N, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, et al.: Effects of axial traction stress on solute transport and proteoglycan synthesis in the porcine intervertebral disc in vitro. Eur Spine J 1994, 3:325-330.
103. Rannou F, Richette P, Benallaoua M, et al.: Cyclic tensile stretch modulates proteoglycan production by intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus cells through production of nitrite oxide. J Cell Biochem 2003, 90:148-157. This study is one of the first to study a mechanism for the inhibition of proteoglycan production in IVD cells by tensile stretch. Using a set of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, the authors conclude that a specific form of nitric oxide synthase, cNOS, may be involved in the downregulation of proteoglycan synthesis, and upregulation of nitric oxide, following tensile stretch.
104. Matsumoto T, Kawakami M, Kuribayashi K, et al.: Cyclic mechanical stretch stress increases the growth rate and collagen synthesis of nucleus pulposus cells in vitro. Spine 1999, 24:315-319.
105. Yamazaki S, Banes AJ, Weinhold PS, et al.: Vibratory loading decreases extracellular matrix and matrix metalloproteinase gene expression in rabbit annulus cells. Spine J 2002, 2:415-420.
106. Yamazaki S, Weinhold PS, Graff RD, et al.: Annulus cells release ATP in response to vibratory loading in vitro. J Cell Biochem 2003, 90:812-818. This study is important for demonstrating that ATP release occurs as a signaling mechanism in intervertebral disc cells, and in response to the mechanical stimulation of vibration.
107. Acaroglu E, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, et al.: Tensile properties of degenerate human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Spine 1995, 20:2690-2701.
108. Ebara S, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, et al.: Tensile properties of nondegenerate human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 1996, 21:452-461.
109. Fujita Y, Duncan NA, Lotz JC: Radial tensile properties of the lumbar annulus fibrosus are site and degeneration dependent. J Orthop Res 1997, 15:814-819.