Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 2201-2207

  Machida, Shigeki ^a   Gotoh, Yasutaka ^a   Toba, Yoshiharu ^a   Ohtaki, Aki ^a   Kaneko, Muneyoshi ^a   Kurosaka, Daijiro ^a  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE FIBER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE; PHOTOPIC NEGATIVE RESPONSE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; POLARIMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD; AGED; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; GONIOSCOPY; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA CONE; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONES (RETINA); ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 44649145454     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0887     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, et al. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:125-141.
2. Spileers W, Falcao-Reis F, Smith R, Hogg C, Arden GB. The human ERG evoked by a Ganzfeld stimulator powered by red and green light emitting diodes. Clin Vision Sci. 1993;8:21-39.
3. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd. The photopic negative response of the macaque electro- retinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1124-1136.
4. Narahashi T. Chemicals as tools in the study of excitable membranes. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:813-889.
5. Bloomfield SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
6. Ohkuma M, Kawai F, Horiguchi M, Miyachi E. Patch-clamp recording of human retinal photoreceptors and bipolar cells. Photochem Photobiol. 2007;83:317-322.
7. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walters JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:514-522.
8. Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y. Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:341-346.
9. Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, et al. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacological blockade of inner retina. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827-3837.
10. Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M, et al. Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with auto- somal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Oph- thalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:820-824.
11. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
12. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith EL 3rd, Crawford MLJ. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2242-2250.
13. Vass C. Modern diagnostic methods for suspected glaucoma and glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221:227-246.
14. Renard JP, Giraud JM, May F, et al. Diagnostic laser in glaucoma: scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) and confocal scanning laser tomography (HRT). JFr Ophtalmol. 2005;28:177-184.
15. Harasymowycz P, Kamdeu Fansi A, Papamatheakis D. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma in the developed world: are we there yet? Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40:477-486.
16. Renard JP, Giraud JM. Glaucoma: structural imagery-HRT, GDX, OCT. JFr Ophthalmol. 2006;29:64-73.
17. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Interpretation of a single field. In: Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999:121-190.
18. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2797-2810.
19. Iacono P, Da Pozzo S, Fuser M, Marchesan R, Ravalico G. Interses- sion reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by GDx-VCC in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmologica. 2006;220:266-271.
20. DeLeon Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Kakati B, et al. Effect of glaucoma- tous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1156-1163.
21. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2213-2220.
22. Maffei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science. 1981;211:953-955.
23. Holder GE. The pattern electroretinogram. In: Fishman GA, Birch DG, Bringnell MG, eds. Ophthalmology Monographs 2: Electro- physiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve and Visual Pathway. 2nd ed. San Francisco: The Foundation of American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2001:197-235.
24. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3662-3668.
25. Bowd C, Zangwill LK, Medeiros FA, et al. Structure-function relationship using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2889-2895.
26. Nitta J, Tazawa Y, Murai K, et al. Relationship between the s-wave amplitude of the multifocal electroretinogram and the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucomatous eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:481-490.
27. Hirose T, Miyake Y, Hara A. Simultaneous recording of electroreti- nogram and visual evoked response: focal stimulation under direct observation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1205-1208.
28. Miyake Y, Shiroyama N, Horiguchi M, Ota I. Asymmetry of focal ERG in human macular region. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30:1743-1749.
29. Miyake Y. Macular oscillatory potentials in humans: macular OPs. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990;75:111-124.
30. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, et al. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2205-2211.
31. Yang A, Swanson WH. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:671-679.