The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: Reduction by experimental glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1124-1136

  Viswanathan, Suresh ^a   Frishman, Laura J ^a   Robson, John G ^a   Harwerth, Ronald S ^a   Smith III, Earl L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TETRODOTOXIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERIMETRY; POTASSIUM CURRENT; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; RETINA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TETRODOTOXIN; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032900340     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D, Sommer A. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 1992;99: 19-28.
2. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
3. Schumer RA, Podos SM. The nerve of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:37-44.
4. Gaasterland DE, Kupfer C. Experimental glaucoma in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1974;13:455-457.
5. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:484-491.
6. Varma R, Quigley HA, Pease ME. Changes in optic disk characteristics and the number of nerve fibers in experimental glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:554-559.
7. Marx MS, Podos SM, Bodis-Wollner I, et al. Flash and pattern electroretinograms in normal and laser-induced glaucomatous primate eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:378-386.
8. Marx MS, Podos SM, Bodis-Wollner I, Lee PY, Wang RF, Severin C. Signs of early damage in glaucomatous monkey eyes: low spatial frequency losses in the pattern ERG and VEP. Exp Eye Res. 1988; 46:173-184.
9. Johnson MA, Drum BA, Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR. Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30:897-907.
10. Smith EL III, Chino YM, Harwerth RS, Ridder WH, Crawford MLJ, DeSantis L. Retinal inputs to the monkey's lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1993;8:113-139.
11. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, et al. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:125-141.
12. Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, DeSantis L. Contrast sensitivity perimetry in experimental glaucoma: investigations with degenerate gratings. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1997:3-12.
13. Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, DeSantis L. Experimental glaucoma: perimetric field defects and intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:390-401.
14. Granit R. The components of the retinal action potential in mammals and their relation to the discharge in the optic nerve. J Physiol. 1933;77:207-239.
15. Penn RD, Hagins WA. Signal transmission along retinal rods and the origin of the a-wave. Nature. 1969;223:201-205.
16. Miller RF, Dowling JE. Intracellular responses of Müller (glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to the b-wave of the electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1970;33:323-341.
17. + hypothesis. J Neurophysiol 1984;51: 164-182.
18. Stockton RA, Slaughter MM. B-wave of the electroretinogram: a reflection of ON bipolar cell activity. J Gen Physiol. 1989;93:101-122.
19. Gurevich L, Slaughter MM. Comparison of the waveforms of the ON bipolar neuron and the b-wave of the electroretinogram. Vision Res. 1993;33:2431-2435.
20. Xu XJ, Karwoski CJ. Current source density analysis of retinal field potentials, 2: pharmacological analysis of the b-wave and m-wave. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:96-105.
21. Robson JG, Frishman LJ. Response linearity and dynamics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted ERG. Vis Neurosci. 1995;12:837.
22. Brown KT, Watanabe K. Isolation and identification Of the of a receptor potential from the pure cone fovea of the monkey retina. Nature. 1962;193:958-960.
23. Whitten DN, Brown KT. The timecourse of the late receptor potential from the monkey cones and rods. Vision Res. 1973;13: 107-135.
24. Heynen H, Van Norren D. Origin of the electroretinogram in the intact macaque eye, I. Vision Res. 1985;25:697-707.
25. Bush RA, Sieving PA. A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:635-645.
26. Sieving PA, Murayama K, Naarendorp F. Push-pull model of the primate photopic electroretinogram: a role for hyperpolarizing neurons in shaping the b-wave. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:519-532.
27. Sieving PA, Frishman LJ, Steinberg RH. Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat. J Neuropbysiol. 1986;56:1049-1061.
28. Sieving PA, Wakabayashi K. Comparison of rod threshold ERG from monkey, cat and human. Clin Vis Sci. 1991;6:171-179.
29. Karwoski C, Kawasaki K. Oscillatory potentials. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Handbook of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision Testing. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991:125-128.
30. Spileers W, Falcao-Reis F, Smith R, Hogg C, Arden GB. The human ERG evoked by a ganzfeld stimulator powered red and green light emitting diodes. Clin Vis Sci. 1993;8:21-39.
31. Maffei L, Fiorentini A, Bisti S, Hollander H. Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Exp Brain Res. 1985;59: 423-425.
32. Korth M. The value of electrophysiological testing in glaucomatous diseases. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:331-343.
33. Graham SL, Klistorner A. Electrophysiology: a review of signal origins and applications to investigating glaucoma. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1998;26:71-85.
34. Narahashi T. Chemicals as tools in the study of excitable membranes. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:813.
35. Bloomneld SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
36. Stafford DK, Dacey DM. Physiology of the A1 amacrine: a spiking, axon-bearing interneuron of the macaque monkey retina. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:507-522.
37. Gustincich S, Feigenspan A, Wu DK, Koopman LJ, Raviola E. Control of dopamine release in the retina: a transgenic approach to neural networks. Neuron. 1997;18:723-736.
38. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL III. Inner retinal contributions to the photopic flash ERG of macaque monkey: suppression of responses by pharmacological agents and experimental glaucoma [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(3):S348. Abstract nr 1601.
39. Viswanathan S, Nguyen HM, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL III. Is the flash electroretinogram useful for assessing retinal ganglion function in humans? Optom Vision Sci. 1996; 73(suppl):82.
40. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, Robson JG. Photopic negative responses in the flash ERG are greatly reduced in experimental glaucoma when visual sensitivity losses are mild [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(4):S976. Abstract nr 4509.
41. Quigley HA, Hohman RM. Laser energy levels for trabecular mesh- work damage in the primate eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1305-1307.
42. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith EL III, Crawford MLJ. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(4):S440. Abstract nr 2034.
43. Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, DeSantis L. Behavioral perimetry in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:31-40.
44. Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA. Improved electrode for electro-retinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18:988-991.
45. Evers HU, Gouras P. Three cone mechanisms in the primate electroretinogram: two with, one without off-center bipolar responses. Vision Res. 1986;26:245-254.
46. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ. Evidence that negative potentials in the photopic electroretinograms of cats and primates depend upon spiking activity of retinal ganglion cell axons (abstract). Soc Neurosci. 1997;23:1024.
47. Sutter EE, Bearse MA. The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res. 1999;39:419-436.
48. Purpura K, Tranchina D, Kaplan E, Shapley RM. Light adaptation in the primate retina: analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci. 1990;4:75-93.
49. Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Du L. Contributions of the positive and negative scotopic threshold responses to the scotopic cat ERG [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(4):S1273. Abstract nr 2810.
50. Frishman LJ, Steinberg RH. Intraretinal analysis of the threshold dark-adapted ERG of the cat retina. J Neuropbysiol. 1989;61:1221-1232.
51. Linn DM, Solessio E, Perlman I, Lasater EM. The role of potassium conductance in the generation of light responses in Müller cells of the turtle retina. Vis Neurosci. 1998;15:449-458.
52. Sieving PA. Photopic ON- and OFF-pathway abnormalities in retinal dystrophies. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1993;91:701-773.
53. Varela HJ, Hernandez MR. Astrocyte responses in human optic nerve head with primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1997; 6:303-313.
54. Francke M, Pannicke T, Biedermann B, Faude F, Reichelt W. Sodium current amplitude increases dramatically in human retinal glial cells during diseases of the eye. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:2662-2670.
55. Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Harwerth RS, Pow D, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL III. Glutamate-aspartate transporter level increases in Müller cells of glaucomatous monkey eyes [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(4):S417. Abstract nr 1951.
56. Johnson EC, Deppmeier LMH, McGinty MC, Morrison JC. Chronology of optic nerve head, optic nerve and retinal ganglion cell responses to elevated intraocular pressure [ARVO Abstract] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(4):S161. Abstract nr 799.
57. Korth M, Nguyen NJX, Horn F, Martus P. Scotopic threshold response and scotopic PII in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:619-625.
58. Burkhardt DA. Distinction between a proximal negative response and the local b wave in the retina. Nature. 1969;221:879-880.
59. Borgula GA, Karwoski CJ, Steinberg RH. Light-evoked changes in extracellular pH in frog retina. Vision Res. 1989;29:1069-1077.
60. Ogden TE. The proximal negative response of the primate retina. Vision Res. 1973;13:797-807.
61. Graham SL, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, et al. Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2651-2662.