Selective Loss of the Photopic Negative Response in Patients with Optic Nerve Atrophy

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 341-346

  Gotoh, Yasutaka ^a   Machida, Shigeki ^a   Tazawa, Yutaka ^a  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NERVE CELL; NERVE COMPRESSION; NERVE FIBER; NERVE INJURY; OPTIC NERVE ATROPHY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA CONE; RETINA NERVE CELL; RETINA ROD;

ADULT; AGED; CONES (RETINA); DARK ADAPTATION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; NEURONS; OPTIC ATROPHY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 1542288081     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.3.341     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Spileers W, Reis-Falcao F, Smith R, Hogg C, Arden GB. The human ERG evoked by a ganzfeld stimulator powered by red and green light-emitting diodes. Clin Vis Sci. 1993;8:21-39.
2. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL III. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1124-1136.
3. Narahashi T. Chemicals as tools in the study of excitable membranes. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:813-889.
4. Bloomfield SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
5. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walter JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:514-522.
6. Marmor MF, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography (1999 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;97:143-156
7. Machida S, Sieving PA, Bush RA. Contribution of the photopic negative response to the photopic ERG in rats with inherited photoreceptor degeneration. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology; May 7 2002; Ft Lauderdale, Fla.
8. Gotoh Y. Photopic negative response of eyes with low-tension glaucoma. J Jpn Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;106:481-487.
9. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, et al. Photopic negative response of the human ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2205-2211.
10. Kondo M, Piao CH, Tanikawa A, Horiguchi M, Miyake Y. A contact lens electrode with built-in high intensity white light-emitting diodes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2001;102:1-9.
11. Pieroth L, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, et al. Evaluation of focal defects of the nerve fiber layer using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:570-579.
12. Sanchez-Galeana C, Bowd C, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1812-1818.
13. Strip GG, Halperin LS, Stevens JL, Chu FC. Afferent pupillary defect caused by hyphema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106:352-353.
14. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981;26:39-42.
15. Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Zedowski M, Eysel UT. Quantification of histological changes after calibrated crush of the intraorbital optic nerve in rats. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:233-237.
16. Kerrison JB, Buchanan K, Rosenberg ML, et al. Quantification of optic nerve axon loss associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in the monkey. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119;1333-1341.
17. Sano M, Tazawa Y, Nabeshima T, Mita M. A new wavelet in the multifocal electroretinogram, probably originating from ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1666-1672.
18. Sieving PA, Frishman LJ, Steinberg RH. Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1986;56:1049-1061.
19. Sieving PA, Nino C. Scotopic threshold response (STR) of the human electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:1608-1614.
20. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, et al. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:125-141.
21. Sieving PA. Retinal ganglion cell loss does not abolish the scotopic threshold response (STR) of the cat and the human ERG. Clin Vis Sci. 1991;6:149-158.
22. Kaneko M, Sugawara T, Machida S, et al. Characterization of the scotopic threshold response in background diabetic retinopathy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology; April 29, 2001; Ft Lauderdale, Fla.
23. Mafei L, Fiorrentini A, Bisti S, Hollander H. Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Exp Brain Res. 1985;59:423-425.
24. Mafei L, Fiorrentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science. 1981;211:953-955.
25. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2797-2810.
26. Schuettauf F, Naskar R, Vorwerk CK, Zurakowski D, Dreyer EB. Ganglion cell loss after optic nerve crush mediated through AMPA-kainate and NMDA receptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4313-4316.
27. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ. Evidence that negative potentials in the photopic electroretinograms of cats and primates depend upon spiking activity of retinal ganglion cell axons [abstract]. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1997;23:1024.
28. Salvador-Silva M, Vidal-Sanz M, Villegas-Pérez MP. Microglial cells in the retina of Carassius auratus. J Comp Neurol. 2000;417:431-447.