Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout

Cognition

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 136-154

  Mou, Weimin ^a,b   Xiao, Chengli ^a   McNamara, Timothy P ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Scene recognition; Spatial frames of reference; Spatial memory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL MEMORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 44249127467     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bryant D.J., and Tversky B. Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 (1999) 137-156
2. Burgess N., Spiers H.J., and Paleologou E. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: Dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94 (2004) 149-166
3. Diwadkar V.A., and McNamara T.P. Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science 8 (1997) 302-307
4. Easton R.D., and Sholl M.J. Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 483-500
5. Franklin N., and Tversky B. Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119 (1990) 63-76
6. Holmes M.C., and Sholl M.J. Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 1069-1087
7. Jiang Y., Olson I., and Chun M. Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 683-702
8. Klatzky R.L. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa C., Habel C., and Wender K.F. (Eds). Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (1998), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1-17
9. McNamara T.P. How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory?. In: Freksa C., Brauer W., Habel C., and Wender K. (Eds). Spatial cognition III, routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning, LNAI 2685 (2003), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 174-191
10. Mou W., Fan Y., McNamara T.P., and Owen C. Intrinsic frames of reference and egocentric viewpoints in scene recognition. Cognition 106 (2008) 750-769
11. Mou, W., Liu, X., & McNamara, T.P. (in press). Layout geometry in encoding and retrieval of spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
12. Mou W., and McNamara T.P. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 162-170
13. Mou W., McNamara T.P., Rump B., and Xiao C. Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 1274-1290
14. Mou W., McNamara T.P., Valiquette C.M., and Rump B. Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 142-157
15. Mou W., Zhao M., and McNamara T.P. Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 33 (2007) 145-154
16. Poggio T., and Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343 (1990) 263-266
17. Roskos-Ewoldsen B., McNamara T.P., Shelton A., and Carr W. Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 (1998) 215-226
18. Shelton A.L., and McNamara T.P. Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 (1997) 102-106
19. Shelton A.L., and McNamara T.P. Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology 43 (2001) 274-310
20. Sholl M.J. The role of a self-reference system in spatial navigation. In: Montello D. (Ed). Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographical information science (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 217-232
21. Sholl M.J., and Nolin T.L. Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 1494-1507
22. Simons D.J., and Wang R.F. Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 315-320
23. Valiquette C.M., and McNamara T.P. Different mental representations for place recognition and goal localization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14 (2007) 676-680
24. Valiquette C.M., McNamara T.P., and Labrecque J.S. Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments. Psychological Research 71 (2007) 288-297
25. Valiquette C.M., McNamara T.P., and Smith K. Locomotion, incidental learning, and the selection of spatial reference systems. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 479-489
26. Waller D., and Hodgson E. Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 32 (2006) 867-882
27. Waller D., Lippa Y., and Richardson A. Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: Head, body, and the self-to-array axis. Cognition 106 (2008) 157-183
28. Wang R.F., and Simons D.J. Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition 70 (1999) 191-210
29. Wang R.F., and Spelke E.S. Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77 (2000) 215-250
30. Wang R.F., and Spelke E.S. Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 376-382