The role of a self-reference system in spatial navigation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2205, Issue , 2001, Pages 217-232

  Jeanne Sholl, M ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive map; Geocentric heading; Inertial dead reckoning; Navigational tracking device; Path integration; Self reference system

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY;

COGNITIVE MAPS; DEAD RECKONING; GEOCENTRIC HEADING; PATH INTEGRATION; SELF-REFERENCES; TRACKING DEVICES;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 84937561881     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45424-1_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
2. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483-500.
3. Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory and Cognition, 23, 397-407.
4. Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63-76.
5. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Gollege, R. G., Cincinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
7. May, M. (2000, November). Imaginal repositioning in space: Transformation versus interference accounts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
8. McNaughton, B. L., Chen, L. L., & Markus, E. J. (1991). "Dead reckoning," landmark learning, and the sense of direction: A neurophysiological and computational hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 190-202.
9. Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 163-182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R.J. (1982). Process analysis of spatial aptitude. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 311-365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Poltrock, S. E., & Brown, P. (1984). Individual differences in visual imagery and spatial ability. Intelligence, 8, 93-138.
12. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 173-188.
13. Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161-193.
14. Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615-628.
15. Sholl, M. J. (1995). The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical systems, 2, 177-195.
16. Sholl, M. J. (2000). The functional separability of self-reference and object-to-object systems in spatial memory. In S. O'Nuallain. (Ed.), Spatial Cognition: Foundations and Applications: Proceedings of the Mind III, Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Ireland, 1998. (pp. 45-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
17. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.