Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography;Aktueller stand und weitere perspektiven der digitalen mammographie

Radiologe

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 324-334

  Schulz Wendtland, R ^a   Hermann, K P ^b   Wacker, T ^c   Bautz, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced mammography; Conventional mammography; Digital mammography; Tomosynthesis; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; REVIEW;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 44149083291     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1639-4     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Schulz-Wendtland R, Becker N, Bock K et al. (2007) Mammographie- Screening. Radiologe 47: 359-369
2. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE et al. (2002) Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 671-677
3. Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Lell M et al. (2004) Phantomstudie zur Detektion simulierter Läsionen an fünf verschiedenen digitalen und einem konventionellen Mammographiesystem. RöFo 176: 1127-1132
4. Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II Study. Radiology 232: 197-204
5. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M et al. (2006) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353: 1773-1783
6. European Commission (2003) Addendum on digital mammography to chapter 3 of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening, European Protocol for the Quality Control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening, Version 1.0. European Commission, November 2003
7. Normenausschuss Radiologie (2005) PAS 1054: Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren für digitale Mammographie-Einrichtungen. Normenausschuss Radiologie, März 2005
8. Anlage 9.2 BMV-Ä/EKV (2005) Versorgung im Rahmen des Programms zur Früherkennung von Brustkrebs durch Mammographie-Screening. Dtsch Ärztebl 18: A1309
9. Hermann KP, Funke M, Grabbe E (2002) Physikalisch-technische Aspekte der digitalen Mammographie. Radiologe 42: 256-260
10. Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Bautz W (2005) Digitale Mammographie: Klinische Ergebnisse. Radiologe 45: 255-263
11. Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F (2006) Digital mammography: current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol 16: 38-44
12. Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Marten K et al. (2002) Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - clinical results. RöFo 174: 696-699
13. Gosch D, Jendraß S, Scholz M, Kahn T (2006) Strahlenexposition bei der digitalen Vollfeldmammographie mit einem Selen-Flachdetektor. RöFo 178: 693-697
14. Weigel S, Girnus R, Czywoydzinski J et al. (2007) Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters. RöFo 179: 892-895
15. Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S et al. (2007) Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188: 377-384
16. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mamography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 244: 708-717
17. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O Shoughnessy KF, Sickles EA (2001) Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219: 192-202
18. Freer TW, Ullssey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12.860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220: 781-786
19. Funovics M, Schamp S, Helbich TH et al. (2001) Evaluierung eines computerassistierten Diagnosesystems in der Erkennung des Mammakarzinoms. RöFo 173: 218-223
20. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M et al. (2001) Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur J Radiol 11: 2454-2459
21. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR (2006) Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection: prospective evaluation. Radiology 239: 375-383
22. Dean JC, Ilvento CC (2006) Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187: 20-28
23. Ko JM, Nickolas MJ, Mendel JB (2006) Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187: 1483-1491
24. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G et al. (2005) Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 104: 931-935
25. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA (2005) Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184: 439-444
26. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL et al. (2003) Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses in mammograms. Radiology 227: 192-200
27. Karssemeijer N (2000) Computer-aided detection and interpretation in mammography. In: Yaffe MJ (ed) Digital mammography IWDM 2000. Medical Physics Publishing, Wisconsin, pp 243-252
28. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA et al. (2001) Potential of computer-aided diagnose to reduce variability in radiologists interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 227: 192-200
29. Bick U (1996) Computerassistierte Diagnose in der Screeningmammographie. Radiologe 36: 72-80
30. Kegelmeyer WP, Prudeda JM, Bourland PD et al. (1994) Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191: 331-337
31. Elter M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wittenberg T (2007) The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process. Med Phys 23: 4164-4172
32. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al. (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205: 399-406
33. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Lell M et al. (2006) Experimental phantom lesions detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system. RöFo 178: 1219-1223
34. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Lell M et al. (2007) Digital mammographic tomosynthesis system - first clinical results. Eur J Radiol 17: 250-251
35. Diekmann F, Bick U (2007) Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 17: 3086-3092
36. Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Wacker T, Bautz W (2006) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus MR imaging: initial clinical experience. Eur J Radiol 16: 209
37. Rafferty EA (2007) Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin North Am 5: 831-843
38. Lawaczeck R, Diekmann F, Diekmann S (2003) New contrast media designed for x-ray energy subtraction imaging in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 38: 602-608