A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital - The SCOAST study

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 912-918

  Veasey, R A ^a   Large, J K ^a   Silberbauer, J ^a   Paul, G ^a   Taggu, W ^a   Ellery, S ^a   Rathore, V S ^a   Lloyd, G W ^a   Patel, N R ^a   Sulke, A N ^a  

^a EASTBOURNE DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; WARFARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOTOMY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INFECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PAIN THRESHOLD; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETROPERITONEAL HEMORRHAGE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; VASCULAR SURGERY;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HOSPITALS, DISTRICT; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 43749114282     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: 17421241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01761.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hackett D. How many cath labs do we need? Heart 2003 89 : 827 9.
2. Maier W, Abay M, Cook S, Togni M, Zeiher A, Meier B. The 2002 European registry of cardiac catheter interventions. Int J Cardiol 2006 113 : 299 304.
3. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003 14 : 865 85.
4. Baim DS, Knopf WD, Hinohara T et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol 2000 85 : 864 9.
5. Behan MW, Large JK, Patel NR, Lloyd GW, Sulke AN. A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio-Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital. Int J Clin Pract 2007 61 : 367 72.
6. Fram DB, Giri S, Jamil G et al. Suture closure of the femoral arteriotomy following invasive cardiac procedures: a detailed analysis of efficacy, complications, and the impact of early ambulation in 1,200 consecutive, unselected cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 53 : 163 73.
7. Muller DW, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1992 1 : 63 8.
8. Rinder MR, Tamirisa PK, Taniuchi M, Kurz HI, Mumm K, Lasala JM. Safety and efficacy of suture-mediated closure after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 54 : 146 51.
9. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinski EJ, Roubin GS. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993 22 : 1273 9.
10. Legrand V, Doneux P, Martinez C, Gach O, Bellekens M. Femoral access management: comparison between two different vascular closure devices after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Cardiol 2005 60 : 482 8.
11. Park Y, Roh HG, Choo SW et al. Prospective comparison of collagen plug (Angio-Seal) and suture-mediated (the Closer S) closure devices at femoral access sites. Korean J Radiol 2005 6 : 248 55.
12. Duffin DC, Muhlestein JB, Allisson SB et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol 2001 13 : 354 62.
13. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, Siostrzonek P, Mullner M. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004 291 : 350 7.
14. Vaitkus PT. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2004 16 : 243 6.
15. Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T et al. The StarClose vascular closure system: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006 68 : 677 83.
16. Hermiller J, Simonton C, Hinohara T et al. Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 2005 17 : 504 10.
17. Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ, Morgan RA, Belli AM. Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and angio-seal and starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007 30 : 182 8.
18. Williams RE, Angel CY, Bourkaib R et al. Multicenter safety and efficacy analysis of assisted closure after antegrade arterial punctures using the StarClose device. J Endovasc Ther 2007 14 : 498 505.
19. Henry M, Amor M, Allaoui M, Tricoche O. A new access site management tool: the Angio-Seal hemostatic puncture closure device. J Endovasc Surg 1995 2 : 289 96.
20. Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, Kussmaul WG III., Simpfendorfer C. Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Investigators. Am J Cardiol 1998 81 : 569 72.
21. O'Sullivan GJ, Buckenham TM, Belli AM. The use of the angio-seal haemostatic puncture closure device in high risk patients. Clin Radiol 1999 54 : 51 5.
22. Imam A, Carter RM, Phillips-Hughes J, Boardman P, Uberoi R. StarClose vascular closure device: prospective study on 222 deployments in an interventional radiology practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007 30 : 738 42.
23. Kim MC. Vascular closure devices. Cardiol Clin 2006 24 : 277 86, vii.
24. Eggebrecht H, Haude M, von BC et al. Early clinical experience with the 6 French Angio-Seal device: immediate closure of femoral puncture sites after diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001 53 : 437 42.
25. Cooper CL, Miller A. Infectious complications related to the use of the angio-seal hemostatic puncture closure device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999 48 : 301 3.
26. Ferreira AC, Eton D, de ME. Late clinical presentation of femoral artery occlusion after deployment of the angio-seal closure device. J Invasive Cardiol 2002 14 : 689 91.
27. Resnic FS, Arora N, Matheny M, Reynolds MR. A cost-minimization analysis of the angio-seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007 99 : 766 70.
28. Rickli H, Unterweger M, Sutsch G et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 57 : 297 302.
29. Zhang Z, Mahoney EM, Gershony G et al. Impact of the Duett sealing device on quality of life and hospitalization costs for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: results from the study of economic and quality of life substudy of the SEAL trial. Am Heart J 2001 142 : 982 8.
30. Behan MWH, Large JL, Patel NR, Lloyd GW, Sulke AN. Does Angio-Seal use improve outcomes and cost effectiveness in day case coronary angiography? The results of the SEALION Study (Abstract). Eur Heart J 2006 27 (Suppl. 1 516.