StarClose vascular closure device: Prospective study on 222 deployments in an interventional radiology practice

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 738-742

  Imam, Atique ^a   Carter, Ranjana M S ^a   Phillips Hughes, Jane ^a   Boardman, Philip ^a   Uberoi, Raman ^a  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

StarClose; Vascular closure device

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL CALCIFICATION; BLOOD VESSEL CLOSURE DEVICE; DEVICE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE RATE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUNCTURES; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 36049023457     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-007-9079-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST (1999) Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J 138(6; Pt 1):1118-1125
2. Bogart MA (1995) Time to hemostasis: a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery. Am J Crit Care 4(2):149-156
3. Thore V, Berder V, Houplon P, et al. (2001) Role of manual compression time and bed rest duration on the occurrence of femoral bleeding complications after sheath retrieval following 4fr left-sided cardiac catheterization. J Interv Cardiol 14(1):7-10
4. Tagney J, Lackie D (2005) Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal: What is safe practice? A clinical audit. Nurs Crit Care 10(4):167-173
5. Eggebrecht H, Haude M, Woertgen U, et al. (2002) Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(4):486-495
6. Silber S (2000) Ten years of arterial closure devices: a critical analysis of their use after PTCA. Z Kardiol 89(5):383-389
7. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. (2004) Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291:350-357
8. Hoffer EK, Bloch RD (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:865-886
9. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, et al. (1993) A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1273-1279
10. Chamberlin JR, Lardi AB, McKeever LS, et al. (1999) Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47:143-147
11. Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, et al. (2002) Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 55:8-13
12. Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, et al. (1998) Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Invest. Am J Cardiol 81:569-572
13. Abando A, Hood D, Weaver F, et al. (2004) The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. J Vasc Surg 40(2):287-290
14. Belenky A, Aranovich D, Greif F, et al. (2007) Use of a collagen-based device for closure of low brachial artery punctures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):273-275
15. Starnes BW, O'Donnell SD, Gillespie DL, et al. (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg 38(2):263-271
16. Juergens CP, Leung DY, Crozier JA, et al. (2004) Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63(2):166-170
17. Abbot Laboratories (2005) StarClose vascular closure system, instructions for use. Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, CA, p 2
18. Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. (2006) Incidence of vascular injuries after use of the Angio-Seal closure device following endovascular procedures in a single center. World J Surg 30(3):280-284
19. Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA (2005) Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol 56(3):409-412
20. Kirchhof C, Schickel S, Schmidt-Lucke C, et al. (2002) Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device Angio-Seal. Vasa 31(2):101-106
21. Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, et al. (2006) Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 20(2):278-281
22. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, et al. (2001) Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52(1):3-7, discussion 8
23. Jang JJ, Kim M, Gray B, et al. (2006) Claudication secondary to Perclose use after percutaneous procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(5):687-695