Vascular Closure Devices

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 277-286

  Kim, Michael C ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPOLYMER; COLLAGEN; N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; POLY N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; SEALANT; THROMBIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL LABORATORY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLIP; COMPRESSION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ERYTHROCYTE AGGREGATION; FALSE ANEURYSM; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMATOMA; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAFETY; STAPLER; SUTURE; THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE; VASOCONSTRICTION;

CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HEMOSTATICS; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL STAPLERS; SUTURES;

EID: 33744987667     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2006.03.006     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Meyerson S.L., Feldman T., and Desai T.R. Angiographic access site complications in the era of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovasc Surg 14 (2002) 652-656
2. Carey D., Martin J.R., Moore C.A., et al. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52 (2001) 3-7
3. Strategic growth opportunities in cardiovascular interventional treatment drives cardiology sector, American Health Consultants. BBI Newsletter 5 (2001) 1-6
4. Seldinger S.I. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 39 (1953) 366-376
5. Najjar S.F., Healey N., Healey C.M., et al. Evaluation of poly-N-acetyl glucosamine as a hemostatic agent in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: a double-blind, randomized study. J Trauma 57 1 Suppl (2004) S38-S41
6. Nader R.G., Garcia J.C., Drushal K., et al. Clinical evaluation of SyvekPatch in patients undergoing interventional, EPS, and diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 14 (2002) 305-307
7. Alter BM. Noninvasive Hemostasis Pad. Endovascular Today 2005;April:60.
8. Fisher T.H., Connolly R., Thatte H.S., et al. Comparison of structural and hemostatic properties of the poly-N-acetyl glucosamine Syvek Patch with products containing chitosan. Microsc Res Tech 63 (2004) 168-174
9. Vetter J., Ribeiro E., Hinohara T., et al. Suture mediated percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in fully anticoagulated patients following coronary interventions. Circulation 90 (1994) I-621
10. Carere R.G., Webb J.G., Ahmed T., et al. Initial experience using Prostar: a new device for percutaneous suture-mediated closure of arterial puncture sites. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 37 (1996) 367-372
11. Sanborn T.A., Ogilby J.D., Ritter J.M., et al. Reduced vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions with a nonmechanical suture device: results from the randomized RACE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61 (2004) 327-332
12. Cremonesi A., Castriota F., Tarantino F., et al. Femoral arterial hemostasis using the Angio-Seal system after coronary and vascular percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Invas Cardiol 10 (1998) 464-469
13. Sanborn T.A., Gibbs H.H., Brinker J.A., et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22 (1993) 1273-1279
14. Mooney M.R., Ellis S.G., Gershony G., et al. Immediate sealing of arterial puncture sites after cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions: initial US feasibility trial using the Duett vascular closure device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 50 (2000) 96-102
15. Caputo R.P., Ebner A., Grant W.G., et al. Percutaneous femoral arteriotomy repair: initial experience with a novel staple closure device. J Invas Cardiol 14 (2002) 652-656
16. Hermiller J., Simonton C., Hinohara T., et al. Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 17 (2005) 504-510
17. Dangas G., Mehran R., Kokolis S., et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 38 (2001) 638-641
18. Koreny M., Riedmuller E., Nikfardjam M., et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291 (2004) 350-357
19. Meyerson S.L., Feldman T., and Desai T.R. Angiographic access site complications in the era of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovasc Surg 36 2 (2002) 137-144
20. Resnic F.S., Blake G.J., Ohno-Machado L., et al. Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 88 (2001) 493-496
21. Applegate R.J., Grabarczyk M.A., Little W.C., et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 40 (2002) 78-83
22. Kim M.C., Kini A.S., and Lee P.C. Arterial closure devices decrease vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 (2004) A53