A systems view of Drosophila segmentation

Genome Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Levine, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGULATOR PROTEIN; REPRESSOR PROTEIN;

BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; DNA BINDING; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; EPIDERMIS; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MORPHOGENESIS; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL;

EID: 43549124572     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-207     Document Type: Short Survey

References (24)

1. Clyde DE Corado MS Wu X Paré A Papatsenko D Small S A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila. Nature 2003, 426:849-853. 10.1038/nature02189 14685241
2. Segal E Raveh-Sadka T Schroeder M Unnerstall U Gaul U Predicting expression patterns from regulatory sequence in Drosophila segmentation. Nature 2008. doi:10.1038/nature06496.
3. Berman BP Nibu Y Pfeiffer BD Tomancak P Celniker SE Levine M Rubin GM Eisen MB Exploiting transcription factor binding site clustering to identify cis-regulatory modules involved in pattern formation in the Drosophila genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:757-762. 117378 11805330 10.1073/pnas.231608898
4. Berman BP Pfeiffer BD Laverty TR Salzberg SL Rubin GM Eisen MB Celniker SE Computational identification of developmental enhancers: Conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R61. 522868 15345045 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r61
5. Schroeder MD Pearce M Fak J Fan H Unnerstall U Emberly E Rajewsky N Siggia ED Gaul U Transcriptional control in the segmentation gene network of Drosophila. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:1396-1410. 10.1371/ journal.pbio.0020271
6. Ochoa-Espinosa A Yucel G Kaplan L Pare A Pura N Oberstein A Papatsenko D Small S The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:4960-4965. 555997 15793007 10.1073/pnas.0500373102
7. Jaeger J Surkova S Blagov M Janssens H Kosman D Kozlov KN Manu Myasnikova E Vanario-Alonso CE Samsonova M Sharp DH Reinitz J Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 2004, 430:368-371. 10.1038/nature02678 15254541
8. Surkova S Kosman D Kozlov K Manu Myasnikova E Samsonova AA Spirov A Vanario-Alonso CE Samsonova M Reinitz J Characterization of the Drosophila segment determination morphome. Dev Biol 2008, 313:844-862. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.037 18067886
9. Bolouri H Davidson EH Transcriptional regulatory cascades in development: Initial rates, not steady state, determine network kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 2003, 100:9371-9376. 10.1073/ pnas.1533293100
10. Zinzen RP Senger K Levine M Papatsenko D Computational models for neurogenic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. Curr Biol 2006, 16:1358-1365. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.044 16750631
11. Janssens H Hou S Jaeger J Kim AR Myasnikova E Sharp D Reinitz J Quantitative and predictive model of transcriptional control of the Drosophila melanogaster even skipped gene. Nat Genet 2006, 38:1159-1165. 10.1038/ng1886 16980977
12. Reinitz J Mjolsness E Sharp DH Model for cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. J Exp Zool 1995, 271:47-56. 10.1002/jez.1402710106 7852948
13. Ma X Yuan D Diepold K Scarborough T Ma J The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. Development 1996, 122:1195-1206. 8620846
14. Burz DS Rivera-Pomar R Jäckle H Hanes SD Cooperative DNA-binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold-dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 1998, 17:5998-6009. 1170926 9774343 10.1093/emboj/17.20.5998
15. Small S Kraut R Hoey T Warrior R Levine M Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. Genes Dev 1991, 5:827-839. 10.1101/ gad.5.5.827 2026328
16. Small S Blair A Levine M Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 1992, 11:4047-4057. 556915 1327756
17. Hewitt GF Strunk BS Margulies C Priputin T Wang XD Amey R Pabst BA Kosman D Reinitz J Arnosti DN Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: Cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 1999, 126:1201-1210. 10021339
18. Gray S Levine M Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev 1996, 10:700-710. 10.1101/gad.10.6.700 8598297
19. Nibu Y Zhang H Bajor E Barolo S Small S Levine M dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 1998, 17:7009-7020. 1171049 9843507 10.1093/ emboj/17.23.7009
20. Poortinga G Watanabe M Parkhurst SM Drosophila CtBP: A Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J 1998, 17:2067-2078. 1170551 9524128 10.1093/emboj/17.7.2067
21. Nibu Y Levine MS CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:6204-6208. 33446 11353860 10.1073/pnas.111158298
22. Arnosti DN Barolo S Levine M Small S The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 1996, 122:205-214. 8565831
23. Ludwig MZ Patel NH Kreitman M Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: Rules governing conservation and change. Development 1998, 125:949-958. 9449677
24. Ludwig MZ Bergman C Patel NH Kreitman M Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 2000, 403:564-567. 10.1038/35000615 10676967