Comparative 3D finite element stress analysis of straight and angled wedge-shaped implant designs

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 215-225

  Las Casas, Estevam Barbosa ^a   Ferreira, Paulo César ^b   Cimini Jr , Carlos Alberto ^a   Toledo, Elson Magalhães ^c   Da Silva Barra, Luis Paulo ^b   Cruz, Mauro ^d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA   (Brazil)

^c LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA   (Brazil)

^d SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implants; Dental stress analysis; Finite element analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 43149117671     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
3. Eckert SE, Choi Y-G, Sánchez AR, Koka S. Comparison of dental implant systems: Quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:406-415.
4. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:625-642.
5. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-568.
6. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:405-414.
7. Satoh T, Maeda Y, Komiyama Y. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:533-539.
8. Çaglar A, Aydin C, Ozen J, Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:36-44.
9. Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy EA, Brantley WA. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:541-548.
10. Celletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:562-573.
11. Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:819-823.
12. Schroeder A, Sutter F, Krekeler G. Orale Implantologie: Allgemeine Grundlagen Und ITI-Hohlzylindersystem. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1988:377.
13. Sutler F, Schroeder A, Buser DA. The new concept of ITI hollow cylinder and hollow screw implants, 1: Engineering and design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implanls 1988;3:161-172.
14. ten Bruggenkate CM, Sutler F, Oosterbeek HS, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:85-93.
15. Canay S, Hersek N, Akpinar I, Asik Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:591-598.
16. Ferreira PC. Modeling of the Biomechanical Behavior of an Edentulous Mandible with Vertical and Angled Implants [thesis]. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, 2003.
17. ten Bruggenkate CM, Oosterbeek HS, Krekeler G, Asikainen PJ. The placement of angled implants in the edentulous maxillae for the use of overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:807-809.
18. Kallus T, Henry P, Jemt T. Clinical evaluation of angulated abutments for the Brånemark system: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:39-45.
19. Clelland NL, Gilat A. The effect of abutment angulation on stress transfer for an implant. J Prosthodont 1992;1:24-28.
20. Gelb DA, Lazzara RJ. Hierarchy of objectives in implant placement to maximize esthetics: Use of pre-angulated abutments, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:277-287.
21. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Brantley WA. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4:95-100.
22. Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, Vrielinck L. Three-year evaluation of Brånemark implants connected to angulated abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:52-58.
23. Tuncelli B, Poyrazoglu E, Koyluoglu AM, Tezcan S. Comparison of load transfer by angulated, standard and inclined implant abutments. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1997;5:85-88.
24. Dario LJ. A maxillary implant overdenture that utilizes angle-correcting abutments. J Prosthodont 2002;11:41-45.
25. Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist R. A Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:223-228.
26. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457-465.
27. Meijer HJA, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:96-102.
28. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:357-368.
29. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:523-530.
30. Geramy A, Morgano SM. Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:434-440.
31. Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:38-44.
32. Cruz M. Tri-dimensional Stress Analysis Around a Cuneiform Implant by the Finite Element Method [thesis]. Campinas, Brazil: Camil Castelo Branco University, 2001.
33. Cruz M, Reis CC, Mattos FF. Implant-induced expansion of atrophic ridges for the placement of implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:377-381.
34. Cruz M, Wassal T, Toledo EM, Barra LPS, Lemonge ACC. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:675-684.
35. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:155-159.
36. Siegele D, Soltész U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333-340.
37. Akpinar I, Demirel F, Parnas L, Sahin S. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses. Quintessence Int 1996;27:11-17.
38. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: A three-dimensional, finite-element study. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:757-763.
39. Baiamonte T, Abbate MF, Pizzarello F, Lozada JL, James R. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:104-110.
40. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 1997;25:485-491.
41. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kiliçarslan MA, Eskitacioglu G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:227-234.
42. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:578-583.
43. Koolstra JH, Van Eijden TMGJ. Application and validation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system in vivo. J Biomechanics 1992;25:175-187.
44. Korioth TWP, Romilly DP, Hannam AG. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 1992;88:69-96.
45. Keyak JH, Fourkas MG, Meagher JM, Skinner HB. Validation of the automated method of three-dimensional finite element modeling of bone. J Biomed Eng 1993;15:505-509.
46. Inou N, Iioka Y, Fujiwara H, Maki K. Functional adaptation of mandibular bone. In: Hayashi K, Ishikawa H. Computational Biomechanics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1996:23-42.
47. Koolstra JH, Van Eijden TMGJ. The jaw open-close movements predicted by biomechanical modeling. J Biomechanics 1997;30:943-950.
48. Geng J-P, Tan KBC, Liu G-R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-598.
49. Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res 1982;61:25-29.
50. De Vocht JW, Goel VK, Zeitler DL, Lew D, Huffman EA. Development of a finite element model to simulate and study the biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint. 1999:1-9. Available at: https://medlineplus.nlm.nih. gov/research/visible/vhp_conf/devocht/vhppaper.htm
51. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: A finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:85-92.
52. Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": A proposal. Anat Rec 1987;219:1-9.
53. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's Law: The bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:403-413.
54. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem. Anat Rec 1990;226:414-422.
55. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:633-640.
56. Garant PR. Bone. From: Oral Cells and Tissues. Chicago: Quintessence, 2003:195-238.
57. Cruz M, Lourenço AF, Toledo EM, Barra LPS, Lemonge ACC, Wassail T. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries. Technol Health Care 2006;14:421-438.