A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 557-568

  Esposito, Marco ^a,b   Grusovin, Maria Gabriella ^c   Coulthard, Paul ^a   Thomsen, Peter ^b   Worthington, Helen V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Follow up studies; Meta analysis; Oral implants; Randomized controlled clinical trials

Indexed keywords

BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 25444479405     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jokstad A, Brägger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003;53(6 suppl 2):409-443.
2. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. In search of truth: The role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:62-78.
3. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins J. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/ handbook/hbook.htm, 2004.
4. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: Methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:140-149.
5. Geertman ME, Boerrigter EM, Van Waas MAJ, van Oort RP. Clinical aspects of a multicenter clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:194-204.
6. Boerrigter EM, van Oort RP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: Clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:182-190.
7. Jones JD, Saigusa M, Van Sickels JE, Tiner BD, Gardner WA. Clinical evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium plasma-sprayed and titanium plasma-sprayed cylinder dental implants: A preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:137-141.
8. Batenburg RHK, Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Van Oort RP, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: One-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:374-383.
9. Karlsson U, Gotfredsen K, Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fixed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. A comparison of 2 implants with different surface textures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:235-242.
10. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: A prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:17-26.
11. Tawse-Smith A, Payne AGT, Kumara R, Thomson WM. One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: A prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:185-193.
12. Geurs NC, Jeffcoat RL, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Jeffcoat MK. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:811-815.
13. Mau J, Behneke A, Behneke N, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of two coatings of intramobile cylinder implants in 313 partially edentulous mandibles followed up for 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:477-487.
14. Tawse-Smith A, Payne AGT, Kumara R, Thomson WM. Early loading on unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures using a one-stage operative procedure with two different implant systems: A 2-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:33-42.
15. Geertman ME, Boerrigter EM, van Waas MA, et al. [Comparison of dental implant systems for mandibular overdentures]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 1998;105:447-450.
16. Meijer HJ, Geertman ME, Raghoebar GM, Kwakman JM. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 6-year results of a multicenter clinical trial on 3 different implant systems. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1260-1268.
17. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Visser A, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures; five-years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:441-447.
18. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: A 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:879-885.
19. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Visser A. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 10 years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:421-427.
20. Jones JD, Lupori J, Van Sickels JE, Gardner WA. A 5-year comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium plasma-sprayed and titanium plasma-sprayed cylinder dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:649-652.
21. Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: A 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:522-526.
22. 2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001;10:2-7.
23. Engquist B, Åstrand P, Dahlgen S, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37.
24. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: A 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:413-420.
25. Jeffcoat MK, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, Geurs NC, Proskin HM. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:406-410.
26. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
27. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Anzén B, et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI dental implants and Brånemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:1-13.
28. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc 1995;273:408-412.
29. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Jokstad A. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of oral implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:783-792.
30. Moher D, Schultz KF, Altman AF. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-1194.