Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve;Arthroplastie totale de genou assistée par ordinateur. Comparaison de deux systèmes de navigation successifs. Courbe d'apprentissage

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 252-260

  Bove J C ^a  

^a Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumotologie   (France)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Learning curve; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 43049167190     PISSN: 00351040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Laskin R.S., and Beksaç B. Computer-assisted navigation in TKA. Where we are and where we are going. Clin Orthop (2006) 127-131
2. Stöckl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., Fischer M., Krismer M., and Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (2004) 180-186
3. Steiger R. The use of navigation for total knee arthroplasty [knee reconstruction]. Curr Opin Orthop 18 (2007) 54-60
4. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., and Beaver R.J. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B (2004) 372-377
5. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., Proff G., Breitenfelder J., and Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (2005) 152-159
6. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Caupalla H., Banzer D., and Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 830-835
7. Stulberg S.D., Loan P., and Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 Suppl. 2 (2002) 90-98
8. Pitto R.P., Graydon A.J., Bradley L., Malak S.F., Walker C.G., and Anderson I.A. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 601-605
9. Fehring T.K., Mason J.B., Moskal J., Pollock D.C., Mann J., and Williams V.J. When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop 452 (2006) 132-136
10. Bäthis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Lüring C., Zurakowski D., and Grifka J. Alignement in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 86-B (2004) 682-687
11. Kalairajah Y., Cossey A.J., Verrall G.M., Ludbrook G., and Spriggins A.J. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 88-B (2006) 198-202
12. Galaud B., Michaut M., Adam J.-M., Boisrenoult P., Fallet L., Charrois O., et al. Fiabilité de la mesure en navigation de l'axe bi-épicondylien dans les prothèses de genou : corrélation avec le scanner préopératoire. Rev Chir Orthop 92 Suppl. 5 (2006) 2005 2S202
13. Michaut M., Galaud B., Adam J.-M., Boisrenoult P., Fallet L., Charrois O., et al. Précision de la rotation du composant fémoral en navigation dans les arthroplasties totales de genou : étude scannographique pré et post-opératoire. Rev Chir Orthop 92 Suppl. 5 (2006) 2005 2S203
14. Eckhoff D.G., Bach J.M., Spitzer V.M., Reinig K.D., Bagur M.M., Baldini T.H., et al. Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 85 Suppl. 4 (2003) 97-104
15. Mizu-Uchi H., Matsuda S., Miura H., Higaki H., Okazaki K., and Iwamoto Y. The effect of ankle rotation on cutting of the tibia in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 88-A (2006) 2632-2636
16. Siston R.A., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., Delp S.L., and Giori N.J. The variability of femoral rotational alignement in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 87-A (2005) 2276-2280
17. Sikorski J.M., and Blythe M.C. Learning the vagaries of computer-assisted total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 87-B (2005) 903-910
18. Nizard R.S., Porcher R., Ravaud P., Vangaver E., Hannouche D., Bizot P., et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop (2004) 180-188
19. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., Wolfe M.W., and Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (2001) 46-55
20. Lerat J.-L., Besse J.-L., Kad S., Chouteau J., Rollier J.-C., Laptoiu D., et al. Précision des coupes osseuses dans l'arthroplastie totale du genou à l'aide d'un ancillaire conventionnel. 300 poses consécutives de prothèses Innex. Rev Chir Orthop 92 (2006) 248-256
21. Stulberg S.D., Yaffe M.A., and Koo S.S. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 88-A Suppl. 4 (2006) 47-54