Accuracy of total knee replacement bone cuts using a conventional ancillary system: 300 Innex® total knee arthroplasties;Précision des coupes osseuses dans l'arthroplastie totale du genou à l'aide d'un ancillaire conventionnel: Trois cent poses consécutives de prothèses innex®

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 248-256

  Lerat, J L ^a   Besse, J L ^a   Desme D ^a   Kadi, S ^a   Chouteau, J ^a   Rollier, J C ^a   Laptoiu, D ^a   Moyen, B ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Computer assisted knee arthroplasty; Knee; Total knee prosthesis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHROPATHY; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; POLYARTHRITIS; SEX RATIO; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TIBIA SHAFT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT DURATION; VALGUS KNEE; VARUS KNEE; X RAY;

EID: 33744832657     PISSN: 00351040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75732-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. SARAGAGLIA D, PICARD F, CHAUSSARD C, MONTBARBON E, LEITNER F, CINQUIN P : Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur : comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. Résultats d'une étude randomisée de 50 cas. Rev Chir Orthop, 2001, 67, 18-28.
2. JENNY JY, BOERI C : Implantation d'une prothèse totale du genou assistée par ordinateur: Etude comparative castémoin avec une instrumentation traditionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop, 2001, 87, 645-652.
3. STULBERG SD, LOAN P, SARIN V : Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results on an initial experience in thirty-five patients. Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2002, 84, Suppl 2, 90-98.
4. HART R, JANECEK M, CHAKER A, BUCEK P : Total arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop, 2003, 27, 366-369.
5. SPARMANN M, WOLKE B, SZUPALLA H, BANZER D, ZINK A : Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85, 830-835.
6. CHAUCHAN SK, SCOTT RG, BREIDAHL W, BEAVER RJ : Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2004, 86, 372-377.
7. HSU HP, GARD A, WALKER PS, SPECTOR M, EWALD FC : Effect of knee component alignment on tibial load distribution with clinical correlation. Clin Orthop, 1989, 248, 135-144.
8. JEFFERY RS, MORRIS RW, DENHAM RA : Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1991, 73, 709-714.
9. FENG EL, STULBERG SD, WIXSON RL : Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop, 1994, 299, 60-71.
10. RINOPAPOLI E, MANCIN GB, PUCCI G, PAZZAGLIA G, AGLIETTI P : Arthroplastie du genou par prothèse Total Condylar. Résultats à long terme (10 à 17 ans) et analyse de survie. Rev Chir Orthop, 1994, 80, 223-229.
11. RITTER MA, FARIS PM, KEATING EM, MEDING JB : Postoperative alignment of total knee replacements: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop, 1994, 299, 153-156.
12. HUANG CH, YOUNG TH, LEE YT, JAN JS, CHENG CK : Polyethylene failure in New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res, 1998, 39, 153-160.
13. MATSUDA S, MIURA H, NAGAMINE R, URABE K, HARIMAYA K : Changes in knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1999, 14, 566-570.
14. WASIELEWSKI RC, GALANTE JO, LEIGHTY R, NATARAJAN RN, ROSENBERG AG : Wear pattern on retrieved polyethylene inserts and their relationship to technical consideration during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1994, 299, 31-43.
15. SINGERMAN R, DEAN JC, PAGAN HD, GOLBERG VM : Decreased posterior slope increases strain in the posterior cruciate ligament following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1996,11, 99-103.
16. WHITESIDE LA, AMADOR DD : the effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arhroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 3, 51-57.
17. HOFMANN AA, BACKUS KN, WYATT RW : Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1991, 269, 63-69.
18. KRUGLUGER J, STEINWENTER A, KNAHR K : Uncemented Miller-Galante total knee replacement; The influence of alignment on clinical and radiological outcome in a 5 to 8-year follow-up. Int Orthop, 1998, 22, 230-233.
19. REED SC, GOLLISH J : The accuracy of intramedullary guides in total arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12, 677-682.
20. TETER JE, BERGMAN D, COLWELL CW : Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1995, 321, 106-110.
21. TETER JE, BERGMAN D, COLWELL CW: The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop, 1995,321, 117-121.
22. DUPARC J, MASSARE C : Mesures radiologiques des déviations angulaires du genou sur le plan frontal. Ann Radiol, 1967, 10, 635-656.
23. COOKE TD, SCUDAMORE A, BRYANT T, SORBIE C, SIU D, FlSHER B : A quantitative appoach to radiography of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1991, 73, 709-723.
24. OSWALD MH, JAKOB RP, SCHNEIDER E, HOOGEWOOD HM : Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1993, 8, 419-426.
25. PATEL DV, FERRIS BD, AICROTH PM : Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Int Orthop, 1991, 75, 209-210.
26. SWANSON KE, STOCKS GW, WARREN PD, HAZEL MR, JANSSEN HF : Does axial limb rotation affect the tibial alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop, 2000, 371, 246-252.
27. PRAKASH U, WIGDEROWITZ CA, MCGURTY DW, ROXLEY DI : Computerised measurement of tibiofemoral alignment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2001, 83, 819-824.
28. MAHALUXMTVALA J, BANQUES MJK, NICOLAI P. ALDAM CH, ALLEN PW : The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16, 635-640.
29. PETERSEN TL, ENGH GA : Radiological assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1988, 3, 67.
30. PATEL DV, FERRIS BD, AICROTH PM : Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement: short radiographs or long radiographs? Int Orthop, 1991, 15, 209.
31. WRIGHT JG, TREBLE N, FEINSTETN AR: Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1991, 73, 721-723.
32. LONNER JH, LAIRD MT, STUCHIN SA : Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop, 1996, 331, 102-106.
33. JlANG CC, INSALL J : Effect of rotation on the axial alignement of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1989, 248, 50-56.
34. ODENBRING S, BERGGREN AM, PEIL L : Roentgenographic assessment of the hip knee ankle axis in medial gonarthrosis. A study of reproductibility. Clin Orthop, 1993, 289, 195-196.
35. LASKIN RS : Instrumentation pitfalls. You can't go on autopilot! J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18 (suppl. 3), 18-22.
36. MIHALKO WM, BOYLE J, CLARK LD, KRACKOW KA : The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20, 25-28.
37. NIZARD R, PORCHER R, RAVAUD P, VANGAVER E, HANNOUCHE D, BIZOT P, SEDEL L : Use of the cusum technique for evaluation of CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop, 2004, 425, 180-188.
38. BATHIS H, PERLICK L, TTNGART M, PERLICK C, GRIFKA J : Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int orthop, 2004, 17, 935-940.