Learning the vagaries of computer-assisted total knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 903-910

  Sikorski, J M ^a,b   Blythe, M C ^a,c  

^a HOLLYWOOD PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Hollywood Specialist Centre   (Australia)

^c ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE INJURY; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MORBIDITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; SURGICAL RISK; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 22144485914     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15615     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Sikorski JM, Chauhan S. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:319-23.
2. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Scott RG, Lloyd S, Sikorski JM. Computer assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:818-23.
3. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:372-7.
4. Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:510-14.
5. CAS_WA database, a web based database for total knee replacement, www.CAS-Australia.com (accessed 26/07/04).
6. Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determining femoral rotation alignment in total knee arthroplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:301-5.
7. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;392:38-45.
8. Olcott CW, Scott RD. A comparison of four intra-operative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: 22-6.
9. Sikorski JM. Rotational alignment of total knee replacements. In: Bellemans J, Ries M, Victor J, eds. Total knee arthroplasty: a guide to get better performance. Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.
10. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 1998;356: 111-18.
11. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:645-52 (in French).
12. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla D, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective and randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:830-5.