Use of the cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 425, Issue , 2004, Pages 180-188

  Nizard, Remy S ^a   Porcher, Raphael ^b   Ravaud, Philippe ^c   Vangaver, Edouard ^a   Hannouche, Didier ^a   Bizot, Pascal ^a   Sedel, Laurent ^a  

^a HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^b SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^c BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUSUM TECHNIQUE; DEVICE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KNEE DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 4043154277     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000136902.01368.69     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE: Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1331-1334, 1995.
2. Bolsin S, Colson M: The use of the cusum technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care 12:433-138, 2000.
3. Brys DA, Lombardi Jr AJ, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK: A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 263:175-179, 1991.
4. Cates HE, Ritter MA, Keating EM, et al: Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 286:32-39, 1993.
5. Clemens U, Miehlke R, Jens J: Computer Integrated Instrumentation in Knee Arthroplasty: The First 100 Cases With the Orthopilot Knee Navigation System. Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Davos, Switzerland 71, 2001. Abstract.
6. Confalonieri N, Cerea P, Motavalli K: Comparison Study Orthopilot/Search Versus Intra and Extramedullary Alignment System in Total Knee Replacement. Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Davos, Switzerland 52, 2001. Abstract.
7. Coull R, Bankes M, Rossouw D: Evaluation of tibial component angles in 79 consecutive total knee arthroplasties. Knee 6:235-237, 1999.
8. de Oliveira Filho GR: The construction of learning curves for basic skills in anesthetic procedures: An application for the cumulative sum method. Anesth Analg 95:411-416, 2002. table of contents
9. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F: Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354:49-56, 1998.
10. Dennis D, Channer M, Susman M, et al: Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:43-47, 1993.
11. Engh GA, Petersen TL: Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:1-8, 1990.
12. Gabel GT, Rand JA, Sim FH: Total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis in patients who have Paget disease of bone at the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 73A:739-744, 1991.
13. Harvey IA, Manning MP, Sampath SA, Johnson R, Elloy MA: Alignment of total knee arthroplasty: The relationship to radiolucency around the tibial component. Med Eng Phys 17:182-187, 1995.
14. Hsu HP, Garg A, Walker PS, Spector M, Ewald FC: Effect of knee component alignment on tibial load distribution with clinical correlation. Clin Orthop 248:135-144, 1989.
15. Ishii Y, Ohmori G, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB: Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 318:167-175, 1995.
16. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA: Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:709-714, 1991.
17. th Annual Meeting Proceedings, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. February 28-March 4, San Francisco, CA 431, 2001. Abstract.
18. Jiang CC, Insall JN: Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 248:50-56, 1989.
19. Kiefer H, Langemeyer D, Schmerwitz U, et al: Computer Aided Knee Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Technique: First Results. Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Davos, Switzerland 132, 2001. Abstract.
20. Ko PS, Tio MK, Ban CM, et al: Radiologic analysis of the tibial intramedullary canal in Chinese varus knees: Implications in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:212-215, 2001.
21. Maestro A, Harwin SF, Sandoval MG, Vaquera DH, Murcia A: Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: A radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 13:552-558, 1998.
22. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Adlam CH, Allen PW: The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16:635-640, 2001.
23. McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D: Randomised trials in surgery: Problems and possible solutions. BMJ 324:1448-1451, 2002.
24. Mohammed MA, Cheng KK, Rouse A, Marshall T: Bristol, Shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart's forgotten lessons. Lancet 357:463-467, 2001.
25. Nix AB, Rowlands RJ, Kemp KW, Wilson DW, Griffiths K: Internal quality control in clinical chemistry: A teaching review. Stat Med 6:425-440, 1987.
26. Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM, et al: Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:641-647, 2001.
27. Oswald M, Jakob R, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM: Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419-426, 1993.
28. Patel D, Ferris B, Aichroth P: Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement: Short radiographs or long radiographs? Int Orthop 15:209-210, 1991.
29. Petersen TL, Engh GA: Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:67-72, 1988.
30. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice D: Musculoskeletal Conditions in the US. Rosemont, IL. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 127-141, 1999.
31. Reed S, Gollish J: The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:677-682, 1997.
32. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB: Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299:153-156, 1994.
33. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB: Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:136-145, 1994.
34. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al: Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur: Comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:18-28, 2001.
35. Schai PA, Scott RD, Younger AS: Total knee arthroplasty in Paget's disease: Technical problems and results. Orthopedics 22:21-25, 1999.
36. Stulberg S, Loan P, Sarin V: Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement Surgery: An Analysis of an Initial Experience With the Orthopilot System. Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Davos, Switzerland 116, 2001. Abstract.
37. Tillett ED, Engh GA, Petersen T: A comparative study of extramedullary and intramedullary alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 230:176-181, 1988.
38. Van Dobben de Bruyn C: Cumulative Sums Tests: Theory and Practice. London, Griffin 1968.
39. Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA, et al: Cusum as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82:1500-1503, 1995.
40. Williams SM, Parry BR, Schlup MM: Quality control: An application of the cusum. BMJ 304:1359-1361, 1992.
41. Wohl H: The cusum plot: Its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 296:1044-1045, 1977.
42. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR: Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg 73B:721-723, 1991.