The (be)comings and goings of 'developmental disabilities': The cultural politics of 'impairment'

Discourse

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 239-255

  Goodley, Dan ^a   Roets, Griet ^b  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949141229     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596300801966971     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Albrecht, G.L, Seelman, K., & Bury, M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of disability studies. London: Sage.
2. Allan, J. (2004). Deterritorializations: Putting postmodernism to work on teacher education and inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(4), 417-432.
3. Arnold, L. (2006). Disability and 'impairment': What is the essential difference? Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
4. Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst & Co/ BCODP.
5. Barnes, C. (2006). Key debates in disability studies. Paper 4 of the Applying Disability Studies' Seminar Series, Centre of Applied Disability Studies, University of Sheffield, May 15.
6. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (1997). Exploring the divide. Leeds: Disability Press.
7. Bayliss, P. (2006). Breaking out: Intellectual disability and inclusion. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
8. Bearn, G.C. (2000). Differentiating Derrida and Deleuze. Continental Philosophy Review, 33, 441-465.
9. Blackmore, T. (2006). Travels in a non-disabled world: Disabled adults' experiences of inclusion in everyday settings. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
10. Blackmore, T., Simmons, B., & Vakirtzi, E. (2006). Postmodernist rhizomatics and synergistic knowledge creation: The case for rejecting grand narratives in educational research. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
11. Boundas, C.V. (2006). Deleuze and philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12. Braidotti, R. (1991). Patterns of dissonance: A study of women in contemporary philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects. New York: Colombia University Press.
14. Braidotti, R. (1998). Difference, diversity and nomadic subjectivity. Retrieved September 9, 2005 from http://www.let.uu.nl/ ∼Rosi.Braidotti/personal/rosilecture.html
15. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
16. Braidotti, R. (2003). Becoming woman, or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 43-64.
17. Braidotti, R. (2006a). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
18. Braidotti, R. (2006b). The politics of becoming - imperceptible. In C.V. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and Philosophy (pp. 133-159). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
19. Braidotti, R. (2006c). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture and Society, 23 (7-8), 197-208.
20. Buchanan, I., & Colebrook, C. (2000). Deleuze and feminist theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
22. Chanter, T (2006). Gender: Key concepts in philosophy. London: Continuum.
23. Chataika, T. (2006). Inclusive practices: The social ecosystem framework in disability research. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
24. Chinn, D. (2006). All parents together: Professionals talk about parents with developmental disabilities. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
25. Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to 'accurate' theoretical representation of disabled people's experience? Disability & Society, 14(5), 627-42.
26. Corker, M. (2001) Sensing disability. Hypatia, 16 (4), 34-52.
27. Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. London and New York: Continuum.
28. Crow, L. (1996). Including all of our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide (pp. 55-72). Leeds: The Disability Press.
29. Davis, K. (1997). Embody-ing theory: Beyond modernist and postmodernist readings of the body. In K. Davis (Ed.), Embodied practices, feminist perspectives on the body (pp. 1-23). London: Sage Publications.
30. Deleuze, G. (1975-1995). Two regimes of madness. Texts and Interviews. New York: Smiotext(e).
31. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
32. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume I. New York: Vintage Books.
33. Gabel, S. (2002). Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 177-201.
34. Gibson, B.E. (2006). Disability, connectivity and transgressing the autonomous body. Journal of Medical Humanities, 27, 187-196.
35. Goodley, D. (2001). Learning difficulties, the social model of disability and 'impairment': Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16(2), 207-231.
36. Goodley, D. (2003). Who is disabled? Exploring the scope of the social model of disability. In C. Barnes, S. French, & J. Swain (Eds.) Disabling Barriers, enabling environments (pp. 118-124). Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Goodley, D. (2006). Towards socially just pedagogies: A critical disability studies with a hint of uncertainty. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
38. Goodley, D. (2007a). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive education, 11(3), 317-334.
39. Goodley, D. (2007b). Becoming Rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, Guattari and disabled babies. Disability & Society, 22(2), 145-160.
40. Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (Eds.) (2005). Psychology and disability: Critical introductions and reflections. London: Palgrave.
41. Goodley, D., & Rapley, M. (2001). How do you understand learning difficulties: Towards a social theory of 'impairment'. Mental Retardation, 39(3), 229-232.
42. Goodley, D., & Rapley, M. (2002). Changing the subject: Postmodernity and people with learning difficulties. In M. Corker & T Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/Postmodernity. Embodying disability theory (pp. 127-142). London and New York: Continuum.
43. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Clough, P., & Moore, M. (2004). Researching life stories. Method, theory and analyses in a biographical age. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
44. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. London: Routledge.
45. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels. Feminism, nature, power. London: Duke University Press.
46. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
47. Hodgkins, S.L., & Bailey, S. (2006). 'I use my disability, I try and make the most of it if that makes much sense' and 'I know that I cant walk but I can still see, if you took me eyes away I'd kill myself: Disclosure and the dilemmatic nature of disability ideology and subject positioning. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
48. Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of 'impairment'. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325-340.
49. Lather, P. (1991) Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
50. Lather, P. (2005). The foundations/cultural studies nexus: An emerging movement in the education field. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, April 11-15.
51. Linton, S. (1998). Disability studies/Not disability studies. Disability & Society, 13(4), 525-539.
52. Linton, S. (2006). My body politic: A memoir. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
53. Longman, P., & Umansky, L. (Eds.). (2001). The new disability history; American perspectives (history of disability). New York: New York University Press.
54. Lynn, M. (2004). Inserting the 'race' into critical pedagogy: An analysis of 'race-based epistemologies'. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(2), 153-165.
55. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
56. Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
57. Marks, D. (2002). Some concluding notes. Healing the split between psyche and social: Constructions and experiences of disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(3), 46-52.
58. Markula, P. (2006). The dancing body without organs. Deleuze, Femininity, and Performing Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(1), 3-27.
59. Murray, P., & Penman, J. (Eds.). (1996). Let our children be: A collection of stories. Sheffield: Parents with Attitude.
60. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
61. Oliver, M. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology? In: L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & Society: Emerging Issues and Insights (pp. 18-42). Essex: Longman.
62. Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58(4), 296-304.
63. Parker, I. (2003). Discursive resources in the discourse unit, Discourse Analysis Online 1. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/
64. Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493-508.
65. Reeve, D. (2005). Towards a psychology of disability: The emotional effects of living in a disabling society. In D. Goodley & R. Lawthom (Eds.), Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections (pp. 36-49). London: Palgrave.
66. Reeve, D. (2006). Am I a real disabled person or someone with a dodgy arm? A discussion of psycho-emotional disablism and its contribution to identity constructions. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
67. Roets, G. (2006). Cartographies of feminist nomadic epistemologies: Exploring Marie's lived experiences of self-advocacy. Paper presented at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, September 18-21.
68. Roets, G., & Goedgeluck, M. (2007). Daisies on the road. Tracing the political potential of our postmodernist feminist approach to life story research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 58-84.
69. Roets, G., Adams, M., & Van Hove, G. (2006). Challenging the monologue about silent sterilization: Implications for self-advocacy. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 167-174.
70. Roets, G., Adams, M., Adams, R., & Adams, C. (2008). The Pointer Sisters. Drawing cartographies of nomadic epistemologies of 'learning difficulties'. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(5).
71. Roets, G., Goodley, D., & Van Hove, G (2007). Narrative in a nutshell: Sharing hopes, fears and dreams with self-advocates. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Mental Retardation), 45(5), 323-334.
72. Roets, G, Reinaart, R., & Van Hove, G (2008). Living Between Borderlands: Discovering a sense of nomadic subjectivity throughout Rosa's life story. Journal of Gender Studies, 17(2), 99-115.
73. Roets, G., Reinaart, R., Adams, M., & Van Hove, G (2008). Looking at lived experiences of self-advocacy through gendered eyes: Becoming femme fatale with/out 'learning difficulties'. Gender & Education, 20(1), 15-29.
74. Roets, G., Van de Perre, D., Van Hove, G., Schoeters, L., & De Schauwer, E. (2004). One for all - All for one! An account of the joint fight for human rights by Flemish Musketeers and their Tinker Ladies. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 54-64.
75. Roets, G., Van de Perre, D., Van Hove, G., Schoeters, L., & De Schauwer, E. (2005). Apple tree of knowledge. Activist tales as theoretical discourse. One for all - All for one! Musketeers and Tinker Ladies in Dialogue - The Sequel. In D. Goodley & G Van Hove (Eds.), Another disability studies reader? People with developmental disabilities and a disabling world (pp. 95 118). Leuven and Apeldoorn: Garant.
76. Roets, G., Van Hove, G., Vanderplasschen, W., & de Maagd, M. (2007). Exploratie van succesverhalen van mensen met psychische problemen met betaald werk: Op zoek naar krijtlijnen van recovery-georiënteerde trajectbegeleiding [Exploring life stories of people with 'mental health problems' with paid employment: An identification of critical factors in recovery-oriented trajectories into supported employment]. (Orthopedagogische Reeks Gent, Nr. 28). Gent: Universiteit Gent, Vakgroep Orthopedagogiek
77. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. (2004) Issue 6(1).
78. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
79. Shakespeare, T. (Ed.). (1998). The disability reader. London: Cassell.
80. Shakespeare, T. (2006a). Disability rights and wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.
81. Shakespeare, T. (2006b). The blooming of a hundred flowers: Activism, academia, and the disability studies challenge. Plenary session at the British Disability Studies Association 3rd Annual Conference, Lancaster, September 18-21.
82. Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In S. Barnarrt & B.M. Altman (Eds.), Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: Where are we and where do we need to go? Research in Social Science and Disability (Vol. 2) (pp. 9-28). Amsterdam: JAI.
83. St. Pierre, E.A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 283-296.
84. Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
85. Thomas, C. (2001). Feminism and disability: The theoretical and political significance of he personal and the experiential. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics and the struggle for change (pp. 48-58). London: David Fulton.
86. Thomas, C. (2002). The 'disabled' body. In M. Evans & E. Lee (Eds.), Real bodies (pp. 64-78). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
87. Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of Disability and Illness. Contested ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
88. Traustadóttir, R. (2004a) Disability studies: A Nordic perspective. keynote lecture at the British Disability Studies Association conference, Lancaster, July 26-28.
89. Traustadóttir, R. (2004b). A new way of thinking: Exploring the intersection of disability and gender. In K. Kristjaensen & R. Traustadóttir (Eds.), Gender and disability research in the Nordic countries (pp. 49-71). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
90. Traustadóttir, R. (2006). Disability studies: A Nordic perspective. Paper 3 of the Applying Disability Studies' Seminar Series, Centre of Applied Disability Studies, University of Sheffield, May 15. http://www.shef.ac.uk/applieddisabilitystudies/seminars.html
91. Tremain, S. (2002). On the subject of 'impairment'. In M. Corker & T Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity. Embodying disability theory (pp. 32-47). London and New York: Continuum.
92. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS). (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
93. Van Hove, G., Roets, G., & Goodley, D. (2005). Disability studies: About relationships, power and knowing as form of participation. In D. Goodley & G. Van Hove (Eds.), Another disability studies reader? People with developmental disabilities and a disabling world (pp. 187-198). Leuven and Apeldoorn: Garant.
94. Witz, A. (2000). Whose body matters? Feminist sociology and the corporeal turn in sociology and feminism. Body & Society, 6(2), 1-23.