Narrative in a Nutshell: Sharing hopes, fears, and dreams with self-advocates

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 323-334

  Roets, Griet ^a   Goodley, Dan ^b   Van Hove, Geert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DREAM; FEAR; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL DISEASE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; REVIEW; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

DREAMS; FEAR; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; NARRATION; PATIENT ADVOCACY;

EID: 35148898143     PISSN: 19349556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(2007)45[323:NIANSH]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Angrosino, M. V. (1998). Opportunity house. Ethnographic stories of mental retardation. London: Altamira.
2. Baroff, G. (2000). Eugenics, "Baby Doe," and Peter Singer: Toward a more "perfect" society. Mental Retardation, 38, 73-77.
3. Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative's virtues. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 131-157.
4. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1992). The social construction of humanness: Relationships with severely disabled people. In P. M. Ferguson, D. L. Ferguson, & S. J. Taylor (Eds.), Interpreting disability. A qualitative reader (pp. 275-294). New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Booth, T. (1996). Sounds of still voices: Issues in the use of narrative methods with people who have learning difficulties. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability & society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 237-255), Longman Sociology Series. United Kingdom: British Council.
6. Booth, T., & Booth, W. (1996). Sounds of silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability & Society, 11, 55-69.
7. Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects. New York: Colombia University Press.
8. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses. Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions. On nomadic ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11. Chappell, A. L. (1998). Still out in the cold: People with learning difficulties and the social model of disability. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader. Social sciences perspectives. London: Cassell.
12. Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to 'accurate' theoretical representation of disabled people's experience? Disability & Society, 14(5), 627-642.
13. Corker, M., & French, S. (1999). Reclaiming discourse in disability studies. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability discourse (pp. 1-11). Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Disability/postmodernity. Embodying disability theory. London/New York: Continuum.
15. Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retardation, 35, 93-106.
16. Danforth, S. (1999). Opportunity house: Ethnographic stories of mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 166-167.
17. Danforth, S. (2001). A Deweyan perspective on democracy and inquiry in the field of special education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 270-280.
18. Danforth, S. (2004). The "postmodern" heresy in special education: A sociological analysis. Mental Retardation, 42, 445-458.
19. Deleuze, G. (1986/2004). Foucault. London/New York: Les Editions de Minuit/Continuum.
20. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
21. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography. ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London: Sage.
22. Dewaele, I., & Van Hove, G. (2005). Modern times: An ethnographic study on the quality of life of people with a high support need in a Flemish residential facility. Disability & Society, 20, 625-639.
23. Dybwad, G. (1996). From feeblemindedness to self-advocacy: A half century of growth and self-fulfillment. European Journal of Mental Disability, 3(11), 3-18.
24. Dybwad, G., & Bersani, H. (1996). New voices. Self-advocacy by people with disabilities. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
25. Ferguson, D. L., & Ferguson, P. M. (2000). Qualitative research in special education: Notes toward an open inquiry instead of a new orthodoxy? JASH, 25, 180-185.
26. Ferguson, P. (2003). Winks, blinks, squints and twitches: Looking for disability and culture through my son's left eye. In P. Devlieger, F. Rusch, & D. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts and communities (pp. 131-148). Garant, Belgium: Leuven/Apeldoorn.
27. Ferguson, P. M., & Ferguson, D. L. (1995). The interpretivist view of special education and disability: The value of telling stories. In T. M. Skrtic (Ed.), Disability and democracy. Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity (pp. 104-121). New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Ferguson, P. M., Ferguson, D. L., & Taylor, S. J. (1992). Interpreting disability. A qualitative reader. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Boston: Harvard University Press.
30. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2003). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. London: Sage.
31. Goodley, D. (1996). Tales of hidden lives: A critical examination of life history research with people who have learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 11, 333-348.
32. Goodley, D. (1998). Supporting people with learning difficulties in self-advocacy groups and models of disability. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6, 438-446.
33. Goodley, D. (1999). Disability research and the "researcher template": Reflections on grounded subjectivity in ethnographic research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 24-46.
34. Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with 'learning difficulties': The politics of resilience. Buckingham: Open University Press.
35. Goodley, D. (2001). 'Learning difficulties', the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16, 207-231.
36. Goodley, D. (in press). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education.
37. Goodley, D., & Moore, M. (2000). Doing disability research: Activist lives and the academy. Disability & Society, 15, 861-882.
38. Goodley, D., & Van Hove, G. (2005). Another disability studies reader? People with learning difficulties and a disabling world. Belgium. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn.
39. Garant, Goodley, D., & Roets, G. (2007). Impairment talk in disability studies: Against compromise. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. London: Routledge.
41. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels. Feminism, nature power. London: Duke University Press.
42. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
43. Hughes, B. (2002). Bauman's strangers: Impairment and the invalidation of disabled people in modern and post-modern cultures. Disability & Society, 17, 571-584.
44. Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12, 325-340.
45. Johnson, K. (1998). Deinstitutionalizing women. An ethnographic study of institutional care. Cambridge: University Press.
46. Johnson, K., & Traustadóttir, R. (2005). Deinstitutionalization and people with intellectual disabilities: In and out of institutions. London: Jessica Kingsley.
47. Kerr, A., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Genetic politics - From eugenics to genome. London: New Clarion Press.
48. Klotz, J. (2004). Sociocultural study of intellectual disability: Moving beyond labelling and social constructionist perspectives. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 93-104.
49. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
50. Lather, P. (2005, April 11-15). The foundations/cultural studies nexus: An emerging movement in the education field. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
51. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: University Press.
52. Marks, D. (1999). Dimensions of oppression: Theorising the embodied subject. Disability & Society, 14, 611-626.
53. May, D., & Simpson, M. K. (2003). The parent trap: Marriage, parenthood and adulthood for people with intellectual disabilities. Critical Social Policy, 23, 25-43.
54. ONT (Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw). (2002). One for all - All for one! A joint fight for our human rights. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.
55. ONT (Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw). (2005). The master is known by his work: A masterpiece. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.
56. ONT (Onze Nieuwe Toekomst vzw)/Huddersfield People First. (2007). Wereldreizigers/The Travellers, retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.ont.be/wereldreizigers
57. Park, D. C., & Radford, J. P. (1998). From the case files: Reconstructing a history of unvoluntary sterilization. Disability & Society, 13, 317-342.
58. Perry, D., & Whiteside, R. K. (2000). Women, gender and 'disability': Historical and contemporary intersections of "otherness." Abstract, 4(1).
59. Peter, D. (2000). Dynamics of discourse: A case study illuminating power relations in mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 38, 354-362.
60. Phillips, L., & Jorgenson, M. W. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.
61. Reason, P., & Torbert, W. R. (2001). The action turn. Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformations, 6, 1-37.
62. Roets, G., Adams, M., & Van Hove, G. (2006). Challenging the monologue about silent sterilization. Implications for self-advocacy. British Journal of Learning Disabilities (Special edition on the history of self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties international comparisons), 34(3), 167-174.
63. Roets, G., & Goedgeluck, M. (2007). Daisies on the road. Tracing the political potential of our postmodernist feminist approach to life story research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 58-84.
64. Roets, G., Reinaart, R., Adams, M., & Van Hove, G. (in press). Looking at lived experiences of self-advocacy through gendered eyes: Becoming femme fatale with/out 'learning difficulties.' Gender & Education.
65. Roets, G., Reinaart, R., & Van Hove, G. (in press). Intersecting the disciplinary characters of gender studies and disability studies: Discovering a sense of nomadic subjectivity throughout Rosa's life story. Journal of Gender Studies.
66. Roets, G., & Van Hove, G. (2003). The story of Belle, Minnie, Louise & the Sovjets. Throwing light on the dark side of an institution. Disability & Society, 18, 599-624.
67. Roets, G., Van de Perre, D., Van Hove, G., Schoeters, L., & De Schauwer, E. (2004). One for all - All for one! An account of the joint fight for human rights by Flemish Musketeers and their Tinker ladies. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 54-64.
68. Roets, G., Van de Perre, D., Van Hove, G., Schoeters, L., & De Schauwer, E. (2005). Apple tree of knowledge. Activist tales as theoretical discourse. One for all - All for one! Musketeers and Tinker ladies in dialogue - The sequel. In D. Goodley & Van Hove, G. (Eds.), Another disability studies reader? People with learning difficulties and a disabling world (pp. 93-118, 185-198). Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
69. Schoeters, L., Schelfhout, P., Roets, G., Van Hove, G., Townson, L., Chapman, R., & Buchanan, I. (2005). Partnership working between university researchers and self-advocacy organisations: "A way forward for inclusion" in England and "fine feathers make a fine bird" in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Learning Disability, 9, 345-357 (Special issue guest editor P. Ramcharam).
70. Silvers, A. (2002). The crooked timber of humanity: Disability, ideology and the aesthetic. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 228-244). London: Continuum.
71. Skrtic, T. M. (1995). Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York: Teachers College Press.
72. Smith, P. (1999). Food truck's party hat. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 244-261.
73. St. Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 283-296.
74. Tamboukou, M., & Ball, S. J. (2003). Dangerous encounters. Genealogy and ethnography. New York: Peter Lang.
75. Taylor, S. J. (1996). Disability studies and mental retardation. Disability Studies Quarterly, 16(3), 4-13.
76. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1989). On accepting relationships between people with mental retardation and non-disabled people: Towards an understanding of acceptance. Disability, Handicap and Society, 4, 21-36.
77. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & Lutfiya, Z. M. (1995). The variety of community experience: Qualitative studies of family and community life. Baltimore: Brookes.
78. Traustadóttir, R. (1990, July). Obstacles to equality: The double discrimination of women with disabilities. Overview article. Center on Human Policy. Available at http://www.independentliving.org/docs3/chp1997.html
79. Traustadóttir, R. (2006). Learning about self-advocacy from life history: A case study from the United States. British Journal of Learning Disabilities (Special edition on The History of Self-Advocacy for People with Learning Difficulties: International Comparisons), 34(3), 175-180.
80. Traustadóttir, R., & Johnson, K. (2000). Women with intellectual disabilities. Finding a place in the world. London: Jessica Kingsley.
81. Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction. In S. Tremain (Ed.). Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 1-24). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
82. van Drenth, A. (in press). Caring power and disabled children: The rise of the educational élan in the United States and Europe, in particular in Belgium and the Netherlands. In S. Gabel & S. Danforth (Eds.), International handbook on disability studies in education. New York: Peter Lang.
83. Van Hove, G., Roets, G., & Goodley, D. (2005). Disability studies: About relationships, power and knowing as form of participation. In D. Goodley & G. Van Hove (Eds.), Another disability studies reader? People with learning difficulties and a disabling world. Garant, Belgium: Leuven/Apeldoorn.
84. Van Hove, G., Roets, G., Mortier, K., De Schauwer, E., Leroy, M., & Broekaert, E. (in press). Research in inclusive education as a possible opening to disability studies in education. In S. Gabel & S. Danforth (Eds.), International handbook on disability studies in education. New York: Peter Lang.
85. Walmsley, J., & Downer, J. (1997). Shouting the loudest: Self-advocacy, power and diversity. In P. Ramcharam, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life. Learning disability. London: Jessica Kingsley.
86. Watson, N. (2002). Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but I don't see myself as a disabled person: Identity and disability. Disability & Society, 17, 509-527.
87. Williams, P., & Shoultz, B. (1982). We can speak for ourselves. Self-advocacy by mentally handicapped people. London: Souvenir Press.