Some conceptual problems with critical pedagogy

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 177-201

  Gabel, Susan ^a  

^a NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944470922     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-873X.00222     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abberley, P. 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society 2: 5-19.
2. Barnes, C., and M. Oliver. 1995. Disability rights: Rhetoric and reality in the UK. Disability and Society 19: 111-116
3. Behrmann, J. 1990. Study reveals how disabled fare in years after school. Counterpoint 12: 17-18.
4. Corker, M. 1999. Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to "accurate" theoretical representation of disabled people's experience? Disability and Society 14: 627-642
5. Danforth, S. 1997. On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities, Journal of Mental Retardation 35: 93-106.
6. -. 1999. Pragmatism and the scientific validation of practices in American special education. Disability and Society 14: 733-751
7. Dewey, J. 1926. Experience and nature. Chicago, IL: Open Court Press.
8. -. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
9. -. 1938. Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.
10. Ellis, C. 1997. Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice, W. Tierney and Y. Lincoln, eds., pp. 115-142 Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11. Ellsworth, E. 1992. Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy, C. Luke and J. Gore, eds., pp. 90-119. New York/London: Routledge.
12. Erevelles, N. 2000. Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory 50: 25-48.
13. Ferguson, D. 1995. The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a "rabid inclusionist." Phi Delta Kappan 77: 281-287
14. Freire, P. 1970/1994. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
15. Gabel, S. 1997. A theory of an aesthetic of disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
16. -. 1999. Depressed and disabled: Some discursive problems with mental illness. In Disability discourse, M. Corker and S. French, eds., pp. 38-46. England: Open University Press.
17. -. In press. An aesthetic of disability. In Disability studies in education, S. Gabel, ed. New York: Peter Lang.
18. Gerber, P. 1990. The problem, the future, the challenge: The issue of employability for persons with learning disabilities. In Pathways to employment for people with learning disabilities: A plan for action, D. Brown, P. Gerber, and C. Dowdy, eds., pp. 3-9. Washington, DC: President's committee on Employment of People with Disabilities.
19. Giroux, H., and P. McLaren, eds. 1994. Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. New York/London: Routledge.
20. Goldstein, B. 1995. Critical pedagogy in a bilingual special education classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28: 463-475
21. Governors Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities. 1987. A new way of thinking. St Paul, MN: Governors Council on Developmental Disabilities.
22. -. 1992. Youth with disabilities fare poorly after school according to national follow-up study. Futurity May: 1-2.
23. Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. hooks, b. 1994. Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York/ London: Routledge.
25. Kaye, S. 1997. Education of children with disabilities. Disability Statistics Abstract 19: 1-4.
26. -. 2000. Disability and the digital divide. Disability Statistics Abstract 22: 1-4.
27. Lather, P. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York/London: Routledge.
28. Lensmire, T. 1998. Rewriting student voice. Journal of Curriculum Studies 30: 261-291
29. Linton, S. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
30. Linton, S. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press. Longmore, P. 1997. Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In The body and physical difference, D. Mitchell and S. Snyder, eds., pp. 134-158 Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31. Luke, C. 1992. Feminist politics in radical pedagogy. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy, C. Luke and J. Gore, eds., pp. 25-53. New York/London: Routledge.
32. -. 1996. Feminisms and pedagogies of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
33. Luke, C., and J. Gore, eds. 1992. Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York/London: Routledge.
34. -. 1994. Pedagogy. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, R. E. Asher and J. M. Simpson, eds., p. 566. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science Pergamon.
35. Malinowitz, H. 1992. Textual orientations: Lesbian and gay students and the making of discourse communities. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36. Marcuse, H. 1978. The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
37. Marks, D. 1999. Dimensions of oppression: Theorising the embodied subject. Disability and Society 14: 611-626
38. McLaren, P. 1994. Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies, H. Giroux and P. McLaren, eds., pp. 192-222. New York/ London: Routledge.
39. -. 1995. Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. New York/London: Routledge.
40. -. 1998. Revolutionary pedagogy in post-revolutionary times: Rethinking the political economy of critical education. Educational Theory 48: 431-62.
41. McLaren, P., and H. Giroux. 1995. Radical pedagogy and cultural politics: Beyond the discourses of critique and anti-utopianism. In Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era, P. McLaren, ed., pp. 29-57. New York/London: Routledge.
42. Mehan, H., A. Hertweck, and J. L. Meihls. 1986. Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students' educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43. Mitchell, D., and S. Snyder, eds. 1997. The body and physical difference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44. Mohanty, C. 1994. On race and voice: Challenges for liberal education in the 1990's. In Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies, H. Giroux and P. McLaren, eds., pp. 145-160 New York/London: Routledge.
45. Monga, T. 1996. Physical medicine and rehabilitation state of the arts review: Sexuality and disability. Journal of Sex Research 33: 267-270
46. Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. Peters, S. 1996. The politics of disability identity. In Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights, Len Barton, ed., pp. 215-234 New York: Pergamon.
48. Polkinghorne, D. 1997. Reporting qualitative research as practice. In Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice, W. Tierney and Y. Lincoln, eds., pp. 3-22. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49. Pugach, M., and C. Warger. 1996. Treating curriculum as a target of reform: Can special and general education learn from each other? In Curriculum trends, special education and reform: Refocusing the conversation, M. Pugach and C. Warger, eds., 1-22. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Rhodes, W. 1995. Liberatory pedagogy and special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28: 458-462
51. Rioux, M., and M. Bach. 1994. Disability is not measles: Studies in cultural history. North York, Canada: L'Institut Roeher.
52. Sasso, G. 2001. The retreat from inquiry and knowledge in special education. Journal of Special Education 34: 178-193
53. Shakespeare, T. 1996. Disability, identity and difference. In Exploring the divide: Illness and disability, C. Barnes and G. Mercer, eds. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
54. -. 1997. Cultural representations of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? In Disability studies: Past, present and future, L. Barton and M. Oliver, eds., pp. 217- 236 Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
55. Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 1997. Defending the social model. Disability and Society 12: 293-300.
56. Shrewsbury, C. 1987. What is feminist pedagogy? Women's Studies Quarterly 15: 6-27.
57. Slee, R. 1997. Imported or important theory? Social interrogations of disablement and special education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 18: 407-449
58. Sleeter, C., and C. Grant. 1997. Race, class, gender, and disability in current textbooks. In The curriculum studies reader, D. Flinders and S. Thornton, eds., pp. 279- 305. New York: Routledge.
59. Smith, D. 1987. The everyday world as problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
60. Taylor, H. 2000. Many people with disabilities feel isolated, left out of their communities and would like to participate more. Harris Poll #34. Creators Syndicate, Inc.
61. Trupin, L., and D. Rice. 1995. Health status, medical care use, and number of disabling conditions in the United States. Disability Statistics Abstract 9: 1-4.
62. Ulmer, G. 1985. Applied grammatology: Post(e)-pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63. van Manen, M. 1988. The relationship between research and pedagogy. In Contemporary curriculum discourses, W. Pinar, ed., pp. 437-452 Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.
64. -. 1990. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.
65. Wardekker, W., and S. Miedema. 1997. Critical pedagogy: An evaluation and a direction for reformulation. Journal of Curriculum Inquiry 27: 45-61.
66. Woollett, A., and A. Phoenix. 1992. Motherhood as pedagogy: Developmental psychology and the accounts of mothers of young children. In Feminisms and pedagogies of everyday life, C. Luke, ed., pp. 80-102. New York/London: Routledge.