Phylogeny of Conradina and related southeastern scrub mints (Lamiaceae) based on GapC gene sequences

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 579-594

  Edwards, Christine E ^a,b   Lefkowitz, David ^c   Soltis, Douglas E ^b   Soltis, Pamela S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conradina; GapC; Lamiaceae; Nuclear genes; Species phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; CLIMBING PLANT; DATA SET; DNA; GENETIC MARKER; HERITABILITY; HYBRIDIZATION; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; RECONSTRUCTION; SHRUB;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CLINOPODIUM; CONRADINA; DICERANDRA; DICERANDRA FRUTESCENS; LAMIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MENTHA; PILOBLEPHIS; STACHYDEOMA;

EID: 42549087334     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/528758     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altschul SF, TL Madden, AA Schaffer, JH Zhang, Z Zhang, W Miller, DJ Lipman 1997 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402.
2. Barker FK, FM Lutzoni 2002 The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol 51:625-637.
3. Bruen TC, H Philippe, D Bryant 2006 A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172:2665-2681.
4. Cline J, J Braman, H Hogrefe 1996 PCR fidelity of pfu DNA polymerase and other thermostable DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res 24:3546-3551.
5. Cronn R, M Cedroni, T Haselkorn, C Grover, JF Wendel 2002 PCR-mediated recombination in amplification products derived from polyploid cotton. Theor Appl Genet 104:482-489.
6. Crook R 1998 Systematics of Conradina (Lamiaceae). PhD diss. University of Georgia, Athens.
7. Cunningham CW 1997 Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst Biol 46:464-478.
8. Darlu P, G Lecointre 2002 When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol Biol Evol 19:432-437.
9. Dolphin K, R Belshaw, CDL Orme, DLJ Quicke 2000 Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol Phylogenet Evol 17:401-406.
10. Dowton M, AD Austin 2002 Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy: the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst Biol 51:19-31.
11. Edwards CE, DE Soltis, PS Soltis 2006 Molecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA: evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia? Syst Bot 31:193-207.
12. Emshwiller E, JJ Doyle 2002 Origins of domestication and polyploidy in oca (Oxalis tuberosa: Oxalidaceae). 2. Chloroplast-expressed glutamine synthetase data. Am J Bot 89:1042-1056.
13. Farris JS, M Kallersjo, AG Kluge, C Bult 1994 Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
14. Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies - an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
15. Figge RM, M Schubert, H Brinkmann, R Cerff 1999 Glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase gene diversity in eubacteria and eukaryotes: evidence for intra- and inter-kingdom gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 16:429-440.
16. Gray TC 1965 A monograph of the genus Conradina. PhD diss. Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
17. Hasegawa M, H Kishino, TA Yano 1985 Dating of the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160-174.
18. Hipp AL, JC Hall, KJ Sytsma 2004 Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol 53:81-89.
19. Howarth DG, DA Baum 2005 Genealogical evidence of homoploid hybrid speciation in an adaptive radiation of Scaevola (Goodeniaceae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Evolution 59:948-961.
20. Huck RB 1994 Complex patterns of evolution in perennial labiates in Florida. Am J Bot 81(suppl):168-169.
21. Huelsenbeck JP, F Ronquist, R Nielsen, JP Bollback 2001 Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
22. Huson DH, D Bryant 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254-267.
23. Ingvarsson PK 2005 Nucleotide polymorphism and linkage disequilbrium within and among natural populations of European aspen (Populus tremula L., Salicaceae). Genetics 169:945-953.
24. Larget B, DL Simon 1999 Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750-759.
25. Martin DP, C Williamson, D Posada 2005 RDP2: Recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 21:260-262.
26. Martin W, H Brinkmann, C Savonna, R Cerff 1993a Evidence for a chimeric nature of nuclear genomes: eubacterial origin of eukaryotic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8692-8696.
27. Martin W, D Lydiate, H Brinkmann, G Forkmann, H Saedler, R Cerff 1993b Molecular phylogenies in angiosperm evolution. Mol Biol Evol 10:140-162.
28. Morrell PL, DM Toleno, KE Lundy, MT Clegg 2005 Low levels of linkage disequilibrium in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) despite high rates of self-fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2442-2447.
29. Nylander JAA, F Ronquist, JP Huelsenbeck, JL Nieves-Aldrey 2004 Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol 53: 47-67.
30. Olsen KM, BA Schaal 1999 Evidence on the origin of cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5586-5591.
31. Perusse JR, DJ Schoen 2004 Molecular evolution of the GapC gene family in Amsinckia spectabilis populations that differ in out-crossing rate. J Mol Evol 59:427-436.
32. Posada D 2002 Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: empirical data. Mol Biol Evol 19:708-717.
33. Posada D, KA Crandall 1998 MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
34. _ 2002 The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J Mol Evol 54:396-402.
35. Rambaut A 2003 Se-Al: a manual sequence alignment editor. Version 2.0a11. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.
36. Ronquist F, JP Huelsenbeck 2003 MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
37. Ronquist F, HP Huelsenbeck, P van der Mark 2005 MrBayes 3.1 manual. http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php.
38. Sang T 2002 Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37:121-147.
39. Seelanan T, A Schnabel, JF Wendel 1997 Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Syst Bot 22:259-290.
40. Small RL, RC Cronn, JF Wendel 2004 Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Aust Syst Bot 17:145-170.
41. Small RL, JA Ryburn, RC Cronn, T Seelanan, JF Wendel 1998 The tortoise and the hare: choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am J Bot 85:1301-1315.
42. Soltis DE, AB Morris, JS McLachlan, PS Manos, PS Soltis 2006 Comparative phylogeography of unglaciated eastern North America. Mol Ecol 15:4261-4293.
43. Sota T, AP Vogler 2003 Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26:139-154.
44. Strand AE, J LeebensMack, BG Milligan 1997 Nuclear DNA-based markers for plant evolutionary biology. Mol Ecol 6:113-118.
45. Swofford DL 2002 PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.10b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
46. Swofford DL, DP Begle 1993 Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. User's manual. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign. 257 pp.
47. Thompson JD, TJ Gibson, F Plewniak, F Jeanmougin, DG Higgins 1997 The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876-4882.
48. Trusty JL, RG Olmstead, DJ Bogler, A Santos-Guerra, J Francisco-Ortega 2004 Using molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian genus Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) to the New World: a case of conflicting phylogenies. Syst Bot 29:702-715.
49. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) 1996 Recovery plan for nineteen central Florida scrub and high pineland plants (revised). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta.
50. Wagner A, N Blackstone, P Cartwright, M Dick, B Misof, P Snow, GP Wagner, J Bartels, M Murtha, J Pendleton 1994 Surveys of gene families using polymerase chain-reaction: PCR selection and PCR drift. Syst Biol 43:250-261.
51. Wagstaff SJ, RG Olmstead, PD Cantino 1995 Parsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation in subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae). Am J Bot 82:886-892.
52. Wall DP 2002 Use of the nuclear gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase for phylogeny reconstruction of recently diverged lineages in Mitthyridium (Musci: Calymperaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:10-26.
53. Wiens JJ 1998 Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst Biol 47:568-581.
54. _ 1999 Polymorphism in systematics and comparative biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:327-362.
55. Yang ZH 1994 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39:306-314.
56. Yang ZH, B Rannala 1997 Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol Biol Evol 14:717-724.
57. Zhang DX, GM Hewitt 2003 Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects. Mol Ecol 12:1687-1687.