Theoretical study of specific hydrogen-bonding effects on the bridging P-OR bond strength of phosphate monoester dianions

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 112, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 3217-3221

  Iché Tarrat, Nathalie ^a   Barthelat, Jean Claude ^b   Vigroux, Alain ^a  

^a Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III   (France)

^b Université Paul Sabatier   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN;

BOND STRENGTHS; DRIVING FORCES; HYDROGEN-BONDING EFFECTS; MONOESTER DIANIONS; PHOSPHORYL TRANSFER; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE (LMW PTP);

AMINO ACIDS;

ANION; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; ESTER; PHOSPHATE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BOND; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ANIONS; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; ESTERS; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHOSPHATES; SOLUTIONS; WATER;

EID: 42449129225     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp710945w     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Benkovic, S. J.; Schray, K. J. In Transition States of Biochemical Processes; Gandour, R. D., Schowen, R. L., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1978; pp 493-528.
2. Thatcher, G. R. J.; Kluger, R. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1989, 25, 99-265.
3. Hengge, A. C. In Comprehensive Biological Catalysis; Sinnot, M. L., Ed.; Academic Press: London, 1998; Vol. 1, pp 517-542.
4. Hengge, A. C. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 40, 49-108.
5. Kirby, A. J.; Varvoglis, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 415-423.
6. Wittinghofer, A. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 20-23.
7. Klähn, K.; Rosta, E.; Warshel, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15310-15323.
8. Iché-Tarrat, N.; Ruiz-Lopez, M.; Barthelat, J.-C.; Vigroux, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 3617-3629.
9. Åqvist, J.; Kolmodin, K.; Florian, J.; Warshel, A. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, R71-R80.
10. Florian, J.; Warshel, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5473-5474.
11. Florian, J.; Warshel, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 719-734.
12. Glennon, T. M.; Villa, J.; Warshel, A. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 9641-9651.
13. Admiraal, S. J.; Herschlag, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2145-2148.
14. We use the word "associative" to indicate that the sum of the bonding between the incoming nucleophile and outgoing leaving group is greater than the corresponding sum of bond orders in the reactants or products. Thus, in associative transition states, there is greater formation of bond order to the nucleophile than loss of bond order to the leaving group (i.e., bond order increases in going from the ground state to the transition state). Conversely, dissociative transition states are those in which die sum of nucleophile and leaving group bond orders is less than the corresponding bond orders in the reactants or products (i.e., bond order decreases in going from the ground state to the transition state).
15. Jackson, M. D.; Denu, J. M. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2313-2340.
16. Zhang, Z.-Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 385-392.
17. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Dixon, J. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 1624-1627.
18. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Malochowski, W. P.; Van Etten, R. L.; Dixon, J. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8140-8145.
19. Zhang, Z. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 11199-11204.
20. Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.-Y. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 5426-5434.
21. Denu, J. M.; Zhou, G.; Guo, Y.; Dixon, J. E. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 3396-3403.
22. Denu, J. M.; Dixon, J. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 5910-5914.
23. Lohse, D. L.; Denu, J. M.; Santoro, N.; Dixon, J. E. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 4568-4575.
24. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Dixon, J. E. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 9340-9345.
25. 30-32
26. Hansson, T.; Nordlund, P.; Aqvist, J. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 118-127.
27. Hart, J. C.; Hillier, I. H.; Burton, N. A.; Sheppard, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13535-13536.
28. Kolmodin, K.; Aqvist, J. FEBS Lett. 1999, 456, 301-305.
29. Kolmodin, K.; Nordlund, P.; Aqvist, J. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1999, 36, 370-379.
30. Alhambra, C.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Gao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3858-3866.
31. Dillet, V.; Van Etten, R. L.; Bashford, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11321-11333.
32. Asthagiri, D.; Dillet, V.; Liu, T.; Noodleman, L.; Van Etten, R. L.; Bashford, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10225-10235.
33. Hengge, A. C. FEBS Lett. 2001, 501, 99-102.
34. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Wu, L.; Chen, L. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 16088-16096.
35. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.11; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
36. Becke, A. Phys. Rev. A 1998, 38, 3098-3100.
37. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 37, 785-789.
38. Bianciotto, M.; Barthelat, J.-C.; Vigroux, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7573-7587.
39. Bianciotto, M.; Barthelat, J.-C.; Vigroux, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6521-6526.
40. Iché-Tarrat, N.; Barthelat, J.-C.; Rinaldi, D.; Vigroux, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22570-22580.
41. Wang, Y.-N.; Topol, I. A.; Collins, J. R.; Burt, S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13265-13273.
42. Hu, C. H.; Brinck, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5379-5386.
43. Range, K.; McGrath, M. J.; Lopez, X.; York, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1654-1665.
44. Bouteiller, Y.; Mijoule, C.; Nizam, M.; Barthelat, J.-C.; Daudey, J.-P.; Pe'lissier, M.; Silvi, B. Mol. Phys. 1988, 65, 295-312.
45. Pseudopotentials were used to allow future comparisons with previous studies and incoming work in which biologically relevant metal ions will be included in the reacting system.
46. Dillet, V.; Rinaldi, D.; Angyan, J. G.; Rivail, J.-L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 202, 18-22.
47. Dillet, V.; Rinaldi, D.; Rivail, J.-L. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5034-5039.
48. Rinaldi, D.; Bouchy, A.; Rivail, J.-L. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2006, 116, 664-669.
49. Rinaldi, D.; Bouchy, A.; Rivail, J.-L.; Dillet, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 2343-2350.
50. PO is the length (in angstroms) of the bond in question.
51. Jones, P. G.; Kirby, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6207-6212.
52. Loncke, P. G.; Berti, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6132-6140.
53. 55
54. Cheng, H.; Nikolic-Hughes, I.; Wang, J. H.; Deng, H.; O'Brien, P. J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Herschlag, D.; Callender, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11295-11306.
55. Sorensen-Stowell, K.; Hengge, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4805-4809.
56. Bromilow, R. H.; Kirby, A. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1972, 149-155.
57. 51 between the activation free energy for the unimolecular heterolysis of P-OR bonds of phosphate monoester dianions and their bond lengths as observed in crystal structures (longer bonds being more reactive).