Coalition cabinet decision making: Institutional and psychological factors

International Studies Review

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-86

  Kaarbo, Juliet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FOREIGN POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 42149177764     PISSN: 15219488     EISSN: 14682486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00747.x     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Agence France Presse. (2005) Netherlands Again Puts Off Decision on Afghanistan Deployment, December 22.
2. Agence France Presse. (2006) Pressure Mounts on the Netherlands to Send Troops to Afghanistan, January 30.
3. Ahn, C. S. (1997) Government-Party Coordination in Japan's Foreign Policy-Making: The Issue of Permanent Membership in the UNSC. Asian Survey 37: 368-382.
4. Alvaro, Eusebio M., and William D. Crano. (1997) Indirect Minority Influence: Evidence for Leniency in Source Evaluation and Counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 949-964.
5. Andeweg, Rudy B. (1988) Centrifugal Forces and Collective Decision-Making: The Case of the Dutch Cabinet. European Journal of Political Research 16: 125-151.
6. Andeweg, Rudy B., and Galen A. Irwin. (2002) Governance and Politics of the Netherlands. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
7. Asch, Solomon E. (1955) Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American 193: 31-35.
8. Asch, Solomon E. (1956) Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs 70: 1-70.
9. Asmus, Ronald D. (1989) The Politics of Modernizing Short-Range Nuclear Forces in West Germany. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
10. Auerswald, David P. (1999) Inward Bound: Domestic Institutions and Military Conflicts. International Organization 53: 469-504.
11. Bawn, Kathleen, and Frances Rosenbluth. (2006) Short Versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science 50: 251-265.
12. Baylis, Thomas A. (1989) Governing by Committee. New York: State University of New York Press.
13. Bazerman, Max H., Jared R. Curhan, Don A. Moore, and Kathleen L. Valley. (2000) Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 279-314.
14. Beasley, R yan. (1998) Collective Interpretations: How Problem Representations Aggregate in Foreign Policy Groups. In Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making, edited by Donald Sylvan and James Voss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Beasley, Ryan K., Juliet Kaarbo, Charles F. Hermann, and Margaret G. Hermann. (2001) People and Processes in Foreign Policymaking: Insights From Comparative Case Studies. International Studies Review 3: 217-250.
16. Belloni, Frank P., and Dennis C. Beller, Eds. (1978) Faction Politics: Political Parties and Factionalism in Comparative Perspective. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio.
17. Berger, Thomas U. (1999) Alliance Politics and Japan's Postwar Culture of Antimilitarism. In The U.S.-Japan Alliance: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Michael J. Green and Patrick M. Cronin. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
18. Bickerton, Ian, and Daniel Dombey. (2006) Dutch Edge Closer to NATO Deployment as Opposition Chief Set to Come on Side. Financial Times, February 1.
19. Billings, Robert S., and Charles F. Hermann. (1998) Problem Identification in Sequential Policy Decision Making: The Re-Representation of Problems. In Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making, edited by D. Sylvan and J. Voss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Blondel,Jean. (1997) Introduction: Western European Cabinets in Comparative Perspective. In Cabinets in Western Europe, 2nd edition, edited by Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. New York: St. Martin's Press.
21. Blondel, Jean, and Ferdinand Müller -Rommel. (1993) Introduction. In Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets, edited by Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. New York: St. Martin's Press.
22. Brauer, Markus, and Charles M. Judd. (1996) Group Polarization and Repeated Attitude Expressions: A New Take on an Old Topic. In European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 7, edited by Wolfgang Stroebe and Miles Hewstone. Chicester, UK: John Wiley.
23. Brockner, Joel, and Jeffrey Z. Rubin. (1985) Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. Brown, Rupert. (2000) Group Processes. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Browne, Eric C. (1982) Considerations on the Construction of a Theory of Cabinet Coalition Behavior. In Governmental Coalitions in Western Democracies, edited by Eric C. Browne and J. Dreijmanis. New York: Longman.
26. Butera, Fabrizzio, and Gabriel Mugny. (2001) Conflicts and Social Influences in Hypothesis Testing. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Carlsnaes, Walter. (1992) The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36: 245-270.
28. Carpenter, R. Charli. (2005) Women, Children, and Other Vulnerable Groups: Gender, Strategic Frames, and the Protection of Civilians as a Transnational Issue. International Studies Quarterly 49: 295.
29. Charlton, Sue Ellen M. (2004) Comparing Asian Politics: India, China, and Japan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30. Clark, Russell D., III. (1994) A Few Parallels Between Group Polarization and Minority Influence. In Minority Influence, edited by Serge Moscovici. Chicago, MI: Nelson-Hall.
31. Clark, Russell D., III, and Anne Maass. (1988) Social Categorization and Minority Influence: The Case of Homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 347-364.
32. Clemens, Clay. (1994) The Chancellor as Manager: Helmut Kohl, the CDU, and Governance in Germany. West European Politics 17: 28-51.
33. Crano, William D. (2001) Social Influence, Social Identity, and Ingroup Leniency. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. Crano, William D., and Xin Chen. (1998) The Leniency Contract and Persistence of Majority and Minority Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1437-1450.
35. Dansereau, F. J r, G. Graen, and W. J. Haga. (1975) A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership Within Formal Organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13: 46-78.
36. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and Bianca Beersma. (2001) Minority Influence in Organizations. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
37. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., and Nanne K. De Vries. (1993) Numerical Support, Information Processing, and Attitude Change. European Journal of Social Psychology 23: 647-662.
38. De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nanne K. De Vries, Ernestine H. Gordijn, and Mieke S. Schuurman. (1999) Convergent and Divergent Processing of Majority and Minority Arguments: Effects on Focal and Related Attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 329-348.
39. De Vries, Nanne K., and Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2000) Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Introduction and Overview. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Dempsey, Judy. (2005) Dutch Future in Afghan Force Uncertain; NATO Awaits Final Decision by the Netherlands on Sending Troops. International Herald Tribune, December 24.
41. Destler, I.M. (1972) Comment: Multiple Advocacy: Some "Limits and Costs". American Political Science Review 66: 786-790.
42. Deutsch, Morton, and Shula Shichman. (1986) Conflict: A Social Psychological Perspective. In Political Psychology, edited by Margaret G. Hermann. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
43. Deutsche Presse -Agentur. (2005) Dutch Cabinet for Sending Troops to Afghanistan, But No Decision, December 22.
44. Dodd, Clement H. (1969) Politics and Government in Turkey. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
45. Dooley, Robert S., and Gerald E. Fryxell. (1999) Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment From Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams. Academy of Management Journal 42: 389-402.
46. Doty, Roxanne Lynn. (1993) Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of US Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly 37: 297-320.
47. Elazar, Daniel J., and Shmuel Sandler, Eds. (1992) Who's the Boss in Israel: Israel at the Polls, 1988-89. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
48. Elman, Miriam Fendius. (2000) Unpacking Democracy: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Theories of Democratic Peace. Security Studies 9: 91-126.
49. Fisher, Ronald. (1990) The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict Resolution. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Frognier, Andre -Paul. (1993) The Single Party/Coalition Distinction and Cabinet Decision-Making. In Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets, edited by Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. New York: St. Martin's Press.
51. Fuller, Sally Riggs, and Ramon J. Aldag. (1997) Challenging the Mindguards: Moving Small Group Analysis Beyond Groupthink. In Beyond Groupthink, edited by Paul 't Hart, Eric Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
52. Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Peter Mair. (2001) Representative Government in Modern Europe, 3rd edition. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
53. Gallhofer, Irmtraud N., Willem E. Sairs, and Robert Voogt. (1994) From Individual Preference to Group Decisions in Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Dutch Council of Ministers. European Journal of Political Research 25: 151-170.
54. Garrison, Jean. (1999) Games Advisors Play: Foreign Policy Advisors in the Influence Process. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
55. Garrison, Jean. (2007) Constructing the 'National Interest'in US-China Policy Making: How Foreign Policy Decision Groups Define and Signal Policy Choices. Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 105-126.
56. George, Alexander L. (1972) The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy. American Political Science Review 66: 751-785.
57. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. (2004) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
58. Goldberg, Giora. (1992) The Likud: Moving Toward the Center. In Who's the Boss in Israel: Israel at the Polls, 1988-89, edited by Daniel J. Elazar and Shmuel Sandler. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
59. Goldstein, Judith, and Robert Keohane. (1993) Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert Keohane. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60. Green, Michael Jonathan. (2001) Japan's Reluctant Realism: Foreign Policy Challenges in an Era of Uncertain Power. New York: Palgrave.
61. Gruenfeld, Deborah H. (1995) Status, Ideology, and Integrative Complexity on the US Supreme Court: Rethinking the Politics of Political Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 5-20.
62. Gruenfeld, Deborah H., Melissa C. Thomas-Hunt, and Peter H. Kim. (1998) Cognitive Flexibility, Communication Strategy, and Integrative Complexity in Groups: Public Versus Private Reactions to Majority and Minority Status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34: 202-226.
63. Haas, Mark L. (2001) Prospect Theory and the Cuban Missile Crisis. International Studies Quarterly 45: 241-270.
64. Hagan, Joe D. (1993) Political Opposition and Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
65. Hagan, Joe D., Philip P. Everts, Haruhiro Fukui, and John D. Stempel. (2001) Foreign Policy by Coalition: Deadlock, Compromise, and Anarchy. International Studies Review 3: 169-216.
66. Hale, William. (2000) Turkish Foreign Policy 1774-2000. London: Frank Cass.
67. Hanrieder, Wolfram F., and Graeme P.Auton. (1980) The Foreign Policies of West Germany, France, Britain. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
68. 'tHart, Paul. (1997) From Analysis to Reform of Policy-Making Groups. In Beyond Groupthink, edited by Paul 't Hart, Eric Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
69. 't Hart, Paul, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius. (1997) Foreign Policymaking at the Top: Political Group Dynamics. In Beyond Groupthink, edited by Paul 't Hart, Eric Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
70. Herek, Gregory, Irving Janis, and Paul Huth. (1987) Decisionmaking During International Crises: Is Process Related to Outcome? Journal of Conflict Resolution 31: 203-226.
71. Hermann, Charles F. (1993) Avoiding Pathologies in Foreign Policy Decision Groups. In Diplomacy, Force and Leadership, edited by D. Caldwell and Timothy J. McKeown. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
72. Hine, David. (1982) Factionalism in West European Parties: A Framework for Analysis. West European Politics 5: 36-53.
73. Hofferbert, Robert, and Hans -Dieter Klingemann. (1990) The Policy Impact of Party Programmes and Government Declarations in the Federal Republic of Germany. European Journal of Political Research 18: 277-304.
74. Hoyt, Paul. (1997) The Political Manipulation of Group Composition. Political Psychology 18: 771-790.
75. Ireland, Michael J., and Scott Sigmund Gartner. (2001) Time to Fight: Government Type and Conflict Initiation in Parliamentary Systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 547-568.
76. Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. (2006) Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others. American Political Science Review 100: 165-181.
77. Janis,Irving. (1972) Victims of Groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
78. Jervis, Robert. (1982) Deterrence and Perception. International Security 7: 3-30.
79. Johnston, Alastair J. (2001) Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45: 487-515.
80. Kaarbo, Juliet. (1996a) Power and Influence in Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Role of Junior Coalition Partners in German and Israeli Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly 40: 501-530.
81. Kaarbo, Juliet. (1996b) Influencing Peace: Junior Partners in Israeli Coalition Cabinets. Cooperation and Conflict 31: 243-284.
82. Kaarbo, Juliet. (1997) Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Framework for Research. Political Psychology 18: 553-581.
83. K aarbo, J uliet, and R yan K. B easley. (1998) A Political Perspective on Minority Influence and Strategic Group Composition. In Research on Groups and Teams, Vol. 1, edited by Margaret A. Neale, Elizabeth A. Mannix and Deborah H. Gruenfeld. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
84. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Ryan K. Beasley. (2004) Foreign Policy by Coalition: A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Cabinet Characteristics on Event Behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, September 2-5.
85. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Ryan K. Beasley. (2008) Taking It to the Extreme: The Effect of Coalition Cabinets on Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis. 4: 65-79.
86. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Margaret G. Hermann. (1998) Leadership Styles of Prime Ministers: How Individual Differences Affect the Foreign Policymaking Process. Leadership Quarterly 9: 243-264.
87. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Jeffrey S. Lantis. (2003) The "Greening"of German Foreign Policy in the Iraq Case: Conditions of Junior Party Influence in Governing Coalitions. Acta Politica 38: 201-230.
88. Kameda, Tatsuya, and Shinkichi Sugimori. (1993) Psychological Entrapment in Group Decision Making: An Assigned Decision Rule and a Groupthink Phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 282-292.
89. Kerr, Norbert L. (2001) Is It What One Says or How One Says It? Style vs. Substance From an SDS Perspective. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Kerr, Norbert L., and Robert J. Mac Coun. (1985) The Effects of Jury Size and Polling Method on the Process and Product of Jury Deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 349-363.
91. Kieval, Gershon R. (1983) Party Politics in Israel and the Occupied Territories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
92. Ladeyret, Guy. (2006) The Problem with PR. In Electoral Systems and Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
93. Larsen, Henrik. (1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
94. Levine, John L., and Juliet Kaarbo. (2001) Minority Influence in Political Decisio Making Groups. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
95. Levine, John L., Richard M. Moreland, and Hoon -Seok Choi. (2001) Group Socialization and Newcomer Innovation. In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, edited by M. Hogg and S. Tindale. Oxford: Blackwell.
96. Levy, Jack S. (2000) Loss Aversion, Framing Effects, and International Conflict. In Handbook of War Studies II, edited by Manus Midlarsky. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
97. Lijphart, Arend. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
98. Lindell, Ulf, and Stefan Persson. (1986) The Paradox of Weak State Power: A Research and Literature Overview. Cooperation and Conflict 21: 79-97.
99. Lindsay, James M. (1994) Congress, Foreign Policy, and the New Institutionalism. International Studies Quarterly 38: 281-304.
100. Linz, Juan J. (1990) The Virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy 1: 51-69.
101. Maass, Anne, and Russell D. Clark. (1984) Hidden Impact of Minorities: Fifteen Years of Minority Influence Research. Psychological Bulletin 95: 428-450.
102. Maoz, Zeev. (1990) Framing the National Interest. World Politics 43: 77-110.
103. Maoz, Zeev, and Russett Bruce. (1993) Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review 87: 624-638.
104. Martin, Robin, and Miles Hewston. (2001) Afterthoughts on Afterimages: A Review of the Afterimage Paradigm in Majority and Minority Influence Research. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
105. Metselaar, Max V., and Bertjan Verbeek. (1997) Beyond Decision Making in Formal and Informal Groups: The Dutch Cabinet and the West New Guinea Conflict. In Beyond Groupthink, edited by Paul 't Hart, Eric Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
106. Milgram, Stanley. (1963) Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 376.
107. Milgram, Stanley. (1965) Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority. Human Relations 18: 57-76.
108. Moscovici, Serge. (1976) Social Influence and Social Change. Translated by Carol Sherrard and Greta Heinz. London: Academic Press.
109. Moskowitz, Gordon B., and Shelly Chaiken. (2001) Mediators of Minority Social Influence. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
110. Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm. (2000) Coalition Governance in Western Europe: An Introduction. In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, edited by Wolfgang Müller and Kaare Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Müller, Wolfgang C., Wilfred Philipp, and Peter Gerlich. (1993) Prime Ministers and Cabinet Decision-Making Processes. In Governing Together, edited by Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. New York: St. Martin's Press.
112. Müller -Rommel, Ferdinand. (1994) The Chancellor and His Staff. In Adenauer to Kohl: The Development of the German Chancellorship, edited by S. Padgett. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
113. Myers, David G., and Helmut Lamm. (1976) The Group Polarization Phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin 83: 602-627.
114. Naoto, Nonako. (2000) Characteristics of the Decision-Making Structure of Coalitions. In Power Shuffles and Policy Processes: Coalition Government in Japan in the 1990s, edited by Otake Hideo. New York: Japan Center for International Exchange.
115. Nemeth, Charlan, and Cynthia Chiles. (1988) Modeling Courage: The Role of Dissent in Fostering Independence. European Journal of Social Psychology 18: 275-280.
116. Nemeth, Charlan, and Julianne Kwan. (1987) Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17: 786-797.
117. Ozkececi -Taner, Binnur. (2005) The Impact of Institutionalized Ideas in Coalition Foreign Policy Making: Turkey as an Example, 1991-2002. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 249-278.
118. Palmer, Glenn, Tamar R. London, and Patrick M. Regan. (2004) What's Stopping You?: The Sources of Political Constraints on International Conflict Behavior in Parliamentary Democracies. International Interactions 30: 1-24.
119. Pérez, Juan A., and Gabriel Mugny. (1987) Paradoxical Effects of Categorization in Minority Influence: When Being an Outgroup Is an Advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology 17: 157-169.
120. Peterson, Randall. (1997) A Directive Leadership Style in Group Decision Making Can Be Both Virtue and Vice: Evidence From Elite and Experimental Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 1107-1121.
121. Peterson, Randall, P. D. Owens, Philip E. Tetlock, E. T. Fan, and P. Martorana. (1998) Group Dynamics in Top Management Teams: Groupthink, Vigilance, and Alternative Models of Organizational Failure and Success. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73: 272-305.
122. Powell, G. Bingham. (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
123. Pridham, Geoffrey. (1986) Coalitional Behaviour in Theory and Practice: An Inductive Model for Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
124. P rins, B randon C., and C hristopher S precher. (1999) Institutional Constraints, Political Opposition, and Interstate Dispute Escalation: Evidence From Parliamentary Systems, 1946-89. Journal of Peace Research 36: 271-287.
125. Quade, Quentin L. (2006) PR and Democratic Statecraft. In Electoral Systems and Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
126. Reiter, Dan, and Erik R. Tillman. (2002) Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict. Journal of Politics 64: 810-826.
127. Ripsman, Norrin M. (2002) Peacemaking by Democracies: The Effect of State Autonomy on the Post-World War Settlements. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
128. Rubin, Barry. (2000) Barak's Uneasy Coalition and His Drive for Peace, AJC Israel/Middle East Briefing. Available at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/coalition.html. (June 21, 2007).
129. S aafeld, T homas. (1990) The West German Bundestag After 40Years: The Role of Parliament in a "Party Democracy." West European Politics 13: 68-89.
130. Sartori, Giovanni. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Sathe, Vasant. (1989) For a Directly Elected President. In The Presidential System: The Indian Debate, edited by A. G. Noorani. New Delhi: Sage Publications, India Pvt. Ltd.
132. Schafer, Mark, and Scott Crichlow. (2002) The Process-Outcome Connection in Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Quantitative Study Building on Groupthink. International Studies Quarterly 46: 45-68.
133. Schweiger, D. M., W. R. Sandberg, and J. W. Ragan. (1986) Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus. Academy of Management Journal 29: 51-71.
134. Schwenk, C. R. (1990) Effects of Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47: 161-176.
135. Smith, Christine M., R. Scott Tindale, and Elizabeth M. Anderson. (2001) The Impact of Shared Representations on Minority Influence in Freely Interacting Groups. In Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, edited by Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Nanne K. De Vries. Oxford: Blackwell.
136. Spector, Bertram I. (1977) Negotiation as a Psychological Process. Journal of Conflict Resolution 21: 607-618.
137. S trøm, K aare. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. de Swaan, Abram. (1973) Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments After 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
139. Sylvan, Donald, and Stuart Thorson. (1992) "Ontologies, Problem Representation, and the Cuban Missile Crisis". Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 709-732.
140. Sylvan, Donald A., and James Voss, Eds. (1998) Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
141. Timmermans, Arco. (2003) High Politics in the Low Countries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
142. Tindale, R. Scott., S. Sheffey, and L. A. Scott. (1993) Framing and Group Decision Making: Do Cognitive Changes Parallel Preference Changes? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55: 470-485.
143. Tindale, R. Scott, Christine M. Smith, L. S. Thomas, J. Filkins, and S. Sheffey. (1996) Shared Representations and Asymmetric Social Influence Processes in Small Groups. In Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups, Vol. 1, edited by E. Witte and J. Davis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
144. Verbeek, Bertjan. (2003) Decision-Making in Great Britain During the Suez Crisis. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
145. Vertzberger, Yaacov. (1997) Collective Risk Taking: The Decision-Making Group. In Beyond Groupthink, edited by Paul 't Hart, Eric K. Stern and Bengt Sundelius. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
146. Wallfish, Asher, and Mark Segal. (1979) Cabinet Approves Treaty, With Only Sharon, Landau Opposing. Jerusalem Post, March 20.
147. Weldes, Jutta, and Diana Saco. (1996) Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of "The Cuban Problem,"1960-1994. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25: 361-398.
148. Williams, K. Y., and C. A. O'Reilly III. (1998) Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40Years of Research. Research in Organizational Behavior 20: 77-140.
149. Wood, Wendy. (2000) Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 539-570.
150. Wood, Wendy, Sharon Lundgren, Judith A.Ouellette, Shelly Busceme, and Tamela Blackstone. (1994) Processes of Minority Influence: Influence Effectiveness and Source Perceptions. Psychological Bulletin 115: 323-345.