Emergence of economic institutions: Analysing the third role of Universities in Turku, Finland

Regional Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 323-341

  Srinivas, Smita ^a   Viljamaa, Kimmo ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Economic development; Finland; Institutions; Planning models; Science and technology policy; Universities; Urban and regional development

Indexed keywords

MODELING; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; UNIVERSITY SECTOR; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; LANSI SUOMEN; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; TURKU;

EID: 42149146813     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701291534     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Academy of Finland (2002) Biotechnology in Finland, Impact of Public Research Funding and Strategies for the Future, Academy of Finland, Helsinki
2. Agassi, J. (1960) Methodological individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 11, pp. 244-270.
3. Agassi, J. (1975) Institutional individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 26, pp. 144-155.
4. Antikainen, A. (1980) The Regional University, Lappeenranta
5. Antikainen, A. (1981) The regional impact of universities in Finland. Higher Education, 10, pp. 437-448.
6. Antikainen, A. and Jolkkonen, A. (1994) New universities, welfare state and markets, the case of Finland. Papers from an International Seminar held at Sundsvall Sweden New Universities and Regional Context
7. Arocena, R. and Sutz, J. (2000) Interactive Learning Spaces and Development Policies in Latin America, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg
8. Axelrod, R. (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Studies in Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
9. Benner, M. (2003) The Scandinavian challenge: The future of advanced welfare states in the knowledge economy. Acta Sociologica, 46, pp. 132-149.
10. Bio Turku (2004) Turku Biotechnology Strategy.Bio Turku, Turku
11. Boschma, R. (2004) Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38, pp. 1001-1014.
12. Boucher, G., Conway, C. and Van der Meer, E. (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region's development. Regional Studies, 37, pp. 887-897.
13. Bruun, H. (2002) The emergence of a regional innovation network: A process analysis of the local bio grouping in Turku, Finland. Nordic Perspectives on Process-Based Regional Development Policy, pp. 157-184. Stockholm, Nordregio
14. Bruun, H., Höyssä, M. and Hukkinen, J. (2001) The Making of Biocity, A Study of the Birth a Biotechnology Centre in Turku. Finland
15. Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J. (2000) The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35, pp. 475-496.
16. Cohen, W., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J. (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, pp. 1-23.
17. Cooke, P. (2002) Towards a regional science policy? The rationale from biosciences. Paper presented at the conference on 'Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy' Brighton, UK SPRU, University of Sussex, Falmer
18. Cooke, P., Heiderich, M. and Braczyk, H.-J. (2004) Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in the Globalised World, Routledge, London
19. Curzio, A. and Fortis, M. (2002) Complexity and Industrial Clusters: Dynamics and Models in Theory and Practice, Physica, Berlin
20. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, pp. 487-521.
21. Delanty, G. (2001) Challenging Knowledge, Open University Press, Buckingham
22. Eisenberg, R. S. and Nelson, R. R. (2002) Public versus proprietary science: A fruitful tension?. Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 131:89
23. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postrindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
25. Feller, I. (2004) Virtuous and vicious cycles in the contributions of public research universities to state economic development objectives. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, pp. 138-150.
26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London
27. Goddard, J., Teichler, U., Virtanen, I. and West, P. (2000) External Engagement and Institutional Adjustment: An Evaluation of the University of Turku. Publications of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council No. 3:2000, Edita, Helsinki
28. Goddard, J., Teichler, U., Virtanen, I., West, P. and Puukka, J. (2003) Progressing External Engagement. A Re-evaluation of the Third Role of the University of Turku, Edita, Helsinki
29. Goddard, J. B. (1999) Universities and regional development: An overview. Universities and the Creation of Wealth, pp. 33-46. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
30. Gulbrandsen, J. and Smeby, J.-C. (2002) The external orientation of university researchers: Implications for academic performance and management. Paper presented at the 4th Triple Helix Conference Copenhagen, Denmark
31. Harloe, M. and Perry, B. (2004) Universities, localities and regional development: The emergence of the 'Mode 2' university?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, p. 212.
32. Hermans, R. and Tahvanainen, A.-J. (2002) Ownership and Financial Structure of Biotechnology SMEs: Evidence from Finland, Helsinki
33. Hodgson, G. (1988) Economics and Institutions, A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press and Blackwell, Cambridge
34. Hodgson, G. (2003) The hidden persuaders: Institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, pp. 159-175.
35. Hodgson, G. (2006) What are institutions?. Journal of Economic Issues, 40, pp. 1-25.
36. Holland, B. A. (2001) Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged university. Metropolitan Universities, 2, pp. 20-29.
37. Höyssä, M., Bruun, H. and Hukkinen, J. (2003) The co-evolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland. Research Policy, 33, pp. 769-785.
38. ISPE (2003) A look at the pharmaceutical industry in the Nordics. Pharmaceutical Engineering, 23:3
39. Jasanoff, S. (2003) Technologies of humanity: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41, pp. 223-244.
40. Jolkkonen, A. (1985) Korkeakoululaitoksen muotoutuminen ja uudet tehtävät, Faculty of Education, University of Joensuu, Joensuu
41. Kankaala, K., Kaukonen, E., Kutinlahti, P., Lemola, T., Nieminen, M. and Välimaa, J. (2004) Yliopistojen kolmas tehtävä?, Edita, Helsinki
42. Kosonen, P. (1987) Hyvinvointivaltion haasteet ja pohjoismaiset mallit, Mänttä, Vastapaino
43. Lawton Smith, H. (2003) Knowledge organizations and local economic development: The cases of Oxford and Grenoble. Regional Studies, 37, pp. 899-909.
44. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 349-369. Pinter, London
45. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992) National System of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, New York, NY
46. Malerba, F. (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, pp. 247-264.
47. Martin, B. R. and Etzkowitz, H. (2000) The origin and evolution of the university species. Vest, 13, pp. 9-34.
48. Miettinen, R., Tuunainen, J., Knuuttila, T. and Mattila, E. (2006) Tieteestä tuotteeksi, Yliopistotutkimus muutosten ristipaineessa, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki
49. Ministry of Education (2001) Korkeakoulujen alueellisen kehittämisen työryhmän muistio, Ministry of Education, Helsinki
50. Mowery, D. and Sampat, B. (2004) Universities in national innovation systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 209-239. Oxford University Press, Oxford
51. Nelson, R. R. (1993) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford University Press, Oxford
52. Nieminen, M. and Kaukonen, E. (2001) Universities and R&D Networking in a Knowledge-based Economy: A Glance at Finnish Developments, Sitra, Helsinki
53. Nieminen, M. and Kaukonen, E. (2004) Universities and science - industry relationships: Making a virtue out of necessity?. Embracing the Knowledge Economy. The Dynamic Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System, pp. 196-218. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
54. North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
55. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge
56. Organization for Economic Co-operation Development (OECD) (1999) The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation No. CERI/IMHE/DG(96)10/REVI, OECD, Paris
57. Orava, M., Brännback, M., Renko, M., Suoniemi, S., Söderlund, S. and Wiklund, P. (2001) Turun Bioalan Riskianalyysi, Innomarket, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku
58. Polt, W., Rammer, C., Schartinger, D., Gassler, H. and Schibany, A. (2001) Benchmarking Industry-Science Relations in Europe-The Role of Framework Conditions, European Commission, Brussels
59. Rosenberg, N. and Nelson, R. (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, pp. 323-348.
60. Rutherford, M. (1994) Institutions in Economics, The Old and New Institutionalism, Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
61. Sábato, J. and Mackenzi, M. (1982) La producción de Technología. Autónoma o Transnacional, Nueva Imagen, Mexico City
62. Santos, F. (2003) The coevolution of firms and their knowledge environment: Insights from the pharmaceutical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70, pp. 687-715.
63. Schienstock, G. and Hämäläinen, T. (2001) Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: A Network Approach. Sitra Report Series 7, Sitra, Helsinki
64. Schienstock, G. and Tulkki, P. (2001) The Fourth Pillar? An assessment of the situation of the Finnish biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 14:1
65. Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (2000) Katsaus 2000: Tiedon ja osaamisen haasteet, Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland, Helsinki
66. Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (2003) Osaaminen innovaatiot ja kansainvälistyminen, Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland, Helsinki
67. Scott, R. W. (2001) Institutions and Organisations, Sage, London
68. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997) Academic Capitalism, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
69. Sotarauta, M. and Srinivas, S. (2006) Co-evolutionary policy processes: understanding innovative economies and future resilience. Futures, 38:312
70. Srinivas, S., Kosonen, K.-J., Nummi, J. and Viljamaa, K. (2005) How Public is Publicly-Funded Knowledge? The Dynamics of R&D Projects, Industrial Performance Centre, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
71. Srinivas, S. and Viljamaa, K. (2003) BioTurku: 'Newly' Innovative? The Rise of Bio-pharmaceuticals and the Biotech Concentration in Southwest Finland, Industrial Performance Centre, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
72. Stokes, D. E. (1997) Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
73. Tomlin, R. (1999) University of Turku - External Impact of Research, Technology Transfer and Regional Liaison Activities, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Centre for Higher Education Research, Newcastle
74. Virtanen, I. (2002) Yliopistojen kolmas tehtävä
75. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003) Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher education, 45, pp. 307-335.
76. Ziman, J. (1996) 'Post-academic science': Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9, pp. 67-80.