Knowledge organizations and local economic development: The cases of Oxford and Grenoble

Regional Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 899-909

  Smith, Helen Lawton ^a  

^a Department of Economics Finance and Accounting   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Grenoble; Local economic development; Oxford; Universities

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LOCAL ECONOMY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; URBAN ECONOMY;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; GRENOBLE; ISERE; OXFORD; OXFORDSHIRE; RHONE-ALPES; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 0442281508     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000143904     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ARNOLD H. (2001) Inside track enterprise: Oxford is 'the most innovative" Financial Times, 21 June.
2. BRACZYK H.-J., COOKE P. and HEIDENREICH M. (Eds) (1998) Regional Innovation Systems. UCL Press, London.
3. CHADWICK A., GLASSON J., LAWTON SMITH H., SIMMIE S. and CLARK G. (2003) Enterprising Oxford: The Anatomy of the Oxfordshire High-Tech Economy. Oxfordshire Economic Observatory, Oxford.
4. CHARLES D. and BENNEWORTH P. (2001) Are we realizing our potential? Joining up science and technology policy in the English regions, Reg. Studies 35(1), 73-79.
5. CHARLES D. and CONWAY C. (2001) Higher Education-business Interaction Survey, Research Report 01/68. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Available at: www.hefce.ac.uk
6. CHARLES D. and HOWELLS J. (1992) Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks. Belhaven, London,
7. COHEN P. and LE DÉAUT J.-Y. (1999) Priorité à la Recherche, report to the Prime Minister, 22 July, Paris.
8. COOKE P. (1988) Introduction: origins of the concept, in BRACZYK H.-J., COOKE P. and HEIDENREICH M. (eds) Regional Innovation Systems, pp. 2-27. UCL Press, London.
9. COOMBS R. and METCALFE S. (2000) Universities, the science base and the innovation performance of the UK, CRIC Briefing Paper No. 5, University of Manchester/UMIST, Manchester.
10. DE BERNARDY M. (1999) Reactive and proactive local territory: cooperation and community in Grenoble, Reg. Studies 33(4), 343-52.
11. DE BERNARDY M. and LAWTON SMITH H. (2000) Are barriers between research and economic activities endless?, Report for Les Enjeux Economique de l'Innovation Programme du CNRS, ERAD-TEO, Grenoble.
12. DE BERNARDY M. and LOINGER G. (1997) Technopolis and serendipity: the adjustment effects created by Nancy Brabois and Zirst Technological Parks: a comparison, in RATTI R., BRAMATI A. and GORDON R. (Eds) The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The Gremi Approach, pp. 237-63. Ashgate, London.
13. DE LA MOTHE J. and PAQUET G. (Eds) (1998) Local and Regional Systems of Innovation. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
14. st Century Economics: Perspectives of Socio-economics for a Changing World. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
15. DRUILHE C. and GARNSEY E. (2000) High-tech activity in Cambridge and Grenoble, Entrepreneurship & Reg. Develop. 12(2), 163-77.
16. EDQUIST C. (Ed) (1997) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. Frances Pinter, London.
17. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1995) Green Book on Innovation. Commission for the European Communities, Brussels,
18. FREEMAN C. (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Frances Pinter, London.
19. GARNSEY E. and LAWTON SMITH H. (1998) Proximity and complexity in the emergence of high technology industry: the Oxbridge comparison, Geoforum 29(4), 433-50.
20. GREGERSON B. and JOHNSON B. (1999) Learning economies, innovation systems and European integration, Reg. Studies 31(5), 470-90.
21. GUILLUAME H. (1998) Rapport de Mission sur la Technologie et l'Innovation. M R E T, Paris.
22. HENRY N. and PINCH P. (2000) (The) industrial agglomeration (of Motor Sport Valley): a knowledge, space, economy approach, in BRYSON J., DANIELS P., HENRY N. and POLLARD J. (Eds) Knowledge Space Economy. Routledge, London.
23. HUTTON W. (2001) Remember education, education, education?, Observer, 18 November, p. 18.
24. INNOCULT (1999) Analysing National Research Systems, culture and cooperation, the INNOCULT Program Deliverable D5. Available at: www.iccr-international.org/innocult/reports.html
25. JOHNSON J. (2002) 'Valley' in the Alps, Financial Times, 26 February.
26. LAWTON SMITH H. (1997) National laboratories and innovative networks, R & D Mgt. 27(4), 319-32.
27. LAWTON SMITH H. (1990) The location and development of advanced technology industry in Oxfordshire, unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
28. LAWTON SMITH H. and DE BERNARDY M. (2000) University and public research institute links with regional high-technology S M Es, in KEEBLE D. and WILKINSON F. (Eds) High-technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe, pp. 90-117. Ashgate, Aldershot.
29. LUNDVALL B.-A. (Ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Frances Pinter, London.
30. LUNDVALL B.-A. and MASKELL P. (2000) Nation states and economic development, in CLARK G. L., FELDMAN M. and GERTLER M. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook to Economic Geography, pp. 353-72. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. MALECKI E. (2000) Network models for technology-based growth, in Acs Z. (Ed) Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. Pinter, London.
32. MARTIN R. and SUNLEY P. (2001) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?' paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference on Regionalising the Knowledge Economy, London, November.
33. METCALFE S. (1997) Technology systems and technology policy is an evolutionary framework, in ARCHIBUGI D. and MICHIE J. (Eds) Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. NARIN F., HAMILTON K. S. and OLIVASTRO D. (1997) The increasing linkage between U.S technology and public science, Research Policy 26, 317-30.
35. NELSON R. (Ed) (1993) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD) (1999) The Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: Benchmarking the Knowledge-based Economies. OECD, Paris.
37. OINAS P. and MALECKI E. J (2002) The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems, Int. Sci. Rev. 25(1), 132-48.
38. Oxford University Gazette (1999) 2 December, 130, no. 4531, p. 419.
39. Oxford University Gazette (2001) Resource allocation method, 22 June, 131, no, 4591, p. 1, 167.
40. PECK F. and McGUINNESS D. (2003) U K competitiveness and the regional agenda: making sense of clusters in the North of England, Local Econ. 18(1), 49-62.
41. PORTER M. E. (1998) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York.
42. STORPER M. (1997) The Regional World. Guilford. New York.
43. TERHORST P. (2001) Territorialisation of the state and urban trajectories: Amsterdam and Brussels compared, paper presented at the A A G conference, New York.
44. WILKINSON F. (1983) Productive systems, Camb. J. Econ. 7, 413-29.
45. WATERS R. and LAWTON SMITH H. (2002) R D As and local economic development: scale and competitiveness in Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire, Europ. Plann. Studies 10(5), 633-49.