Universities and science-industry relationships: Making a virtue out of necessity?

Embracing the Knowledge Economy: The Dynamic Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 196-218

  Nieminen, Mika ^a   Kaukonen, Erkki ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149182581     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781843769811.00021     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki and Raine Hermans (2002), Nokia Suomen innovaatiojärjestelmässä (Nokia in the Finnish innovation system), Keskusteluaihe No. 799, Elinkeinoelämän tutkimuslaitos, Helsinki.
2. Becher, Tony (1989), Academic Tribes and Territories, Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.
3. Behrens, T.R. and D.O. Gray (2001) ‘Unintended Consequences of Cooperative Research: Impact of Industry Sponsorship on Climate for Academic Freedom and Other Graduate Student Outcome’, Research Policy, 30, 179-99.
4. Benner, M. and U. Sandström (2000), ‘Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System’, Research Policy, 29, 291-301.
5. Blume, Stuart (1987), ‘The Theoretical Significance of Co-operative Research’, in Stuart Blume, Joske Bunders, Loet Leydesdorff and Richard Whitley (eds), The Social Direction of the Public Sciences: Causes and Consequenses of Co-operation between Scientists and Non-scientific Groups, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
6. Clark, Burton R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon.
7. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1990), ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-53.
8. Development Plan for Education and University Based Research 1991-1996, State Council Decision 18 June 1993 (Koulutuksen ja korkeakouluissa harjoitettavan tutkimuksen kehittämissuunnitelma vuosille 1991-1996, Valtioneuvoston päätös 18.6.1993).
9. Edqvist, Charles (ed.) (1997), Systems Of Innovation: Technologies, Organizations and Institutions, London and Washington: Pinter Publishers.
10. Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple-Helix of University-Industry-Government relations, London: Pinter Publishers.
11. Faulkner, W. (1995), ‘Getting Behind Industry-Public Sector Research Linkage: A Novel Research Design’, Science and Public Policy, 22 (5), 282-94.
12. Faulkner, W. and J. Senker (1995), ‘Policy and Management Issues in Company Linkage with Academic and Government Laboratories: A Gross-technology Study’, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 6 (1), 95-112.
13. Gibbons, Michael, Camilla Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
14. Hakala, Johanna, Erkki Kaukonen, Mika Nieminen and Oili-Helena Ylijoki (2003), Yliopisto - Tieteen kehdosta projektimyllyksi? Yliopistollisen tutkimuksen muutos 1990-luvulla (University - From the Birthplace of Science to a Project-mill? Change of University Research in the 1990s), Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
15. Hakala J., P. Niskanen and E. Kaukonen (2002), ‘Becoming International, Becoming European - EU Research Collaboration at Finnish Universities’, The European Journal of Social Sciences, 15, 357-79.
16. Howells, Jeremy, Maria Nedeva and Luke Georghiou (1998), Industry-Academic Links in the UK, Report 98/70, University of Manchester, PREST.
17. Kaukonen, Erkki (1990) Theory, Dynamics and Policy of Science - Science Studies from a Small Country Perspective, Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Series A, Vol. 300.
18. Kaukonen, E. and M. Nieminen (1999), ‘Modeling the Triple Helix from a Small Country Perspective’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24 (2), 173-83.
19. Kline, Stephen J. and Nathan Rosenberg (1986), ‘An Overview of Innovation’, in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Mayntz, R.. and U. Schimank (1998), ‘Linking Theory and Practice: Introduction’, Research Policy, 27, 747-55.
21. Meyer-Kramer, F. and U. Schmoch (1998), ‘Science-based Technologies: University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields’, Research Policy, 27, 835-51.
22. Miettinen, Reijo (2002) National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric, Helsinki: Edita.
23. Nieminen, Mika and Erkki Kaukonen (2001), Universities and R&D Networking in a Knowledge-Based Economy: A Glance at Finnish Developments, Sitra Reports Series 11, Helsinki: Sitra.
24. Niskanen, Pirjo, Riikka Eela, Sasu Hälikkä and Terttu Luukkonen (1998), Suomalaiset EU:n neljännessä puiteohjelmassa (Finns in the EU’s Fourth Framework Programme), Kansainvälisten verkostojen raportti 3/1998, Helsinki: Tekes.
25. Nissinen, Marja and Pirjo Niskanen (1999), COST - Scientific Cooperation on Researchers’ Terms: A Study on Finnish Participation, VTT Publications 388, Espoo, Technical Research Centre of Finland.
26. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott and Michael Gibbons (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. OECD (1998), University Research in Transition, Paris: OECD.
28. OECD (2000), Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris: OECD.
29. Pavitt, Keith (1984), ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, 13, 343-73.
30. Pavitt, Keith (1998), ‘The Social Shaping of the National Science Base’, Research Policy, 27, 793-805.
31. Pavitt, Keith (2000), Public Policies to Support Basic Research: ‘What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice? (And What They Should not Learn), Electronic Working Papers Series, Paper No. 53, University of Sussex, SPRU. Available www.sussex.ac.uk/spru
32. Prihti, Aatto, Luke Georghiou, Jyrki Juusela, Frieder Meyer-Krahmer, Bertil Roslin, Tuire Santamäki-Vuori and Mirja Gröhn (2000), Assessment of the Additional Appropriation for Research, Sitra Reports Series 2, Helsinki: Sitra.
33. Salter, J.A. and B. Martin (2001), ‘The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review’, Research Policy, 30 (3) 509-32.
34. Schienstock, Gerd and Timo Hämäläinen (2001), Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System: A Network Approach, Sitra Reports Series 7, Helsinki: Sitra.
35. Slaughter, Sheila and Larry L. Leslie (1997), Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, London: The John Hopkins University Press. Statistics Finland, various years, Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
36. Wilts, A. (2000), ‘Forms of Research Organization and Their Responsiveness to External Goal Setting’, Research Policy, 29, 767-81.