The co-evolution of social and physical infrastructure for biotechnology innovation in Turku, Finland

Research Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 769-785

  Höyssä, Maria ^a   Bruun, Henrik ^a   Hukkinen, Janne ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Network of mutual empowerment; Regional change; Science and technology policy; Science park

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

NETWORK OF MUTUAL EMPOWERMENT; REGIONAL CHANGES; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY; SCIENCE PARKS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 2942717237     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott A. EMBO panel gives biology in Finland a pat on the back. Nature. 6618(385):1997;666.
2. Academy of Finland, 1997. State and Standard of Finnish Science, Health Research. Edita, Helsinki.
3. Academy of Finland, 2002. Biotechnology in Finland. Impact of Public Research Funding and Strategies for the Future, No. 11. Evaluation Report, Publications of the Academy of Finland, Edita, Helsinki.
4. Braczyk, H.J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (Eds.), 1998. Regional Innovation Systems. UCL Press, London.
5. Bruun, H. The emergence of a regional innovation network. BioTurku in Turku, Finland. In: Schienstock, G. (Ed.), Catching Up and Forging Ahead: The Finnish Success Story. Edward Elgar.
6. Callon, M., 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation. Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 196-233.
7. Callon, M., 1991. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters, Essays on Power Technology and Domination. Routledge, London, pp. 132-161.
8. Callon, M., 1997/1987. Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 83-103.
9. Callon, M., 1997/1995. Four models for the dynamics of science. In: Tauber, A.I. (Ed.), Science and the Quest for Reality. MacMillan Press, Houndmills, pp. 249-292.
10. Callon, M., 1999. Actor network theory. The market test. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 181-195.
11. Carlsson, C., 2000. Lounais-Suomen informaatioteknologian kehitysohjelma 2000-2005 (Development programme for information technology in Southwest Finland). Overheads Presented in BioCity. 24 October 2000, Turku.
12. Castells, M., 2000. The Rise of the Network Society, second ed. Blackwell, Oxford.
13. Castells, M., Hall, P., 2000/1994. Technopoles of the World. The Making of Twenty-First-Century Industrial Complexes. Routledge, London.
14. Cohen, S.S., Fields, G., 2000. Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. In: Lesser, E.L. (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
15. Cohendet P., Meyer-Krahmer F. The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification. Research Policy. 30:2001;1563-1591.
16. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., Tödtling, F., 2000. The Governance of Innovation in Europe. Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness. Pinter Publishers, London.
17. Cooke, P., Morgan, K. (Eds.), 2000/1998. The Associational Economy. Firms, Regions, and Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Dalum, B., Holmén, M., Jacobsson, S., Praest, M., Rickne, A., Villumsen, G., 1999. In: The Formation of Knowledge-Based Clusters in North Jutland and Western Sweden Paper to the DRUID Conference on National Innovation Systems Industrial Dynamics and Innovation Policy, Rebild. 9-12 June 1999.
19. Edquist, C., 1997. Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Organisations and Institutions. Pinter Publishers/Casell Academic, London.
20. Etzkowitz H. From science park to technopolis: toward a self-reinforcing innovation dynamic. Technology Access Report XV/10. 16:2002a;14-15.
21. Etzkowitz, H., 2002b. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Routledge, London.
22. Etzkowitz H. The triple helix: impetus to innovation. Technology Access Report. XV/11:2002c;9-10.
23. Ferguson, R., 1995. Panacea or let-down? Science Parks in the Literature. The Small Business Research Group, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics, http://www.econ.slu.se/~richardf/scipklit/skipklit. html .
24. Guy, K., 1996. Designing a science park evaluation. In: Guy, K. (Ed.), The Science Park Evaluation Handbook. Report to DGXIII. Technopolis, Brighton.
25. Höyssä, M., 2001. Teknologiakeskusta tekemässä. BioCity-hankkeen vaiheet ideasta osaamiskeskuksen osaksi (Making a Technology Centre. The Stages of the BioCity-Project, From an Idea to a Part of a Centre of Expertise). University of Turku, Turku.
26. Isaksen, A. (Ed.), 1997. Innovasjoner, næringsutvikling og regionalpolitikk (Innovations, Economic Development and Regional Policy). Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand.
27. Kostiainen, J., 2000. Helsingin, Oulun ja Tampereen kaupunkiseudut innovatiivisina miljöinä (Helsinki, Oulu and Tampere as innovative milieux). In: Kostiainen, J., Sotarauta, M. (Eds.), Kaupungit innovatiivisina toimintaympäristöinä. Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto TEK ry, Helsinki, pp. 85-126.
28. Kostiainen, J., Sotarauta, M. (Eds.), 2000. Kaupungit innovatiivisina toimintaympäristöinä (Cities as Innovative Environments). Tekniikan Akateemisten Liitto TEK ry, Helsinki.
29. KOTA Database, 2003.
30. Kuusi, H., 2000. Biotechnology in Finland. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 6 (3), 188-198.
31. Kuusi, H., 2001. Finland a European leader in biotechnology. Kemia-Kemi 28 (6), 432-437.
32. Laaksonen, J., 1994. Osaamiskeskusajattelu: suuntaviivoja, kokemuksia (Centres of expertise idea: trends, experiences). Työraportteja 11/94. Tampereen yliopisto. Yhteiskuntatieteiden tutkimuslaitos, Tampere.
33. Latour, B., 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Latour, B., 1996/1993, Aramis or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Law, J., 1997/1987. Technology and heterogeneous engineering. The case of Portuguese expansion. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T.J. (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111-134.
36. Law, J., Callon, M., 1997/1992. The life and death of an aircraft. A network analysis of technical change. In: Bijker, W. Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 21-52.
37. Lemola, T., 2001. Tiedettä, teknologiaa ja innovaatiota kansakunnan parhaaksi. Katsaus Suomen tiede- ja teknologiapolitiikan lähihistoriaan (Science, technology, and innovation for the people. A survey of the recent history of Finnish science and technology policy). Työpapereita 57/01. VTT teknologian tutkimuksen ryhmä, Espoo.
38. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.), 1995/1992. National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, London.
39. Ministry of Education, 1987. Biotekniikan rahoitustyöryhmän muistio (Memorandum of the Funding of Biotechnology Working Group). Opetusministeriö, Helsinki.
40. Ministry of Education, 1991. Biotekniikka ja molekyylibiologia 1993-1996 (Biotechnology and Molecular Biology 1993-1996). Opetusministeriö, Helsinki.
41. Ministry of the Interior, F., 2003. Huippuosaamisesta alueille kilpailukykyä. Osaamiskeskusten väliarviointi 1999-2002 (Top expertise - competitiveness for regions. Intermediary evaluation of the centres of expertise 1999-2002). Sisäasiainministeriön julkaisu 4/2003. Sisäasiainministeriö, Helsinki.
42. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Nordic Adviser Group, 2000. Biolaakso. Loppuraportti (Biolaakso. Final report). Biolaakso Ltd., Turku, 16 November 2000.
44. Putnam, R., 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1), 65-78.
45. Regional Council of Southwest Finland, 1994. Varsinais-Suomen osaamiskeskusohjelma (Centre of Expertise Program of Southwest Finland). Varsinais-Suomen liitto, Turku.
46. Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Saxenian, A., 2000/1996. Regional Advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London.
48. Schienstock, G., 1999. Transformation and learning. A new perspective on national innovation systems. In: Schienstock, G., Kuusi, O. (Eds.), Transformation Towards a Learning Economy. The Challenge for the Finnish Innovation System. Sitra, Helsinki, pp. 9-56.
49. Schienstock, G., Hämäläinen, T., 2001. Transformation of the Finnish Innovation System. A Network Approach. Sitra Reports Series 7, Sitra, Helsinki.
50. Sotarauta, M. (Ed.), 1999. Kaupunkiseutujen kilpailukyky ja johtaminen tietoyhteiskunnassa (The Competitiveness of Urban Areas and Management in the Informational Society). The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities, Helsinki.
51. Process-Based Regional Development Policy. Nordregio Report 3. Nordregio, Stockholm.
52. Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects. Amateurs and professionals in Berkley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science. 19:1989;387-420.
53. Stenholm, P., 2000. Elinvoimainen Turku. Turun ja Turun seutukunnan elinkeinoelämän kehittyminen 1990-luvulla (Vital Turku. The Development of Economic Life in Turku and Turku Sub-region in the 1990s), B 1/2000. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Business Research and Development Centre, Turku.
54. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., 2001. Managing Innovation. Integrated Technological, Market and Organizational Change, second ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
55. Turku City Council, 1997. Turku-strategia 1997-2000 (Turku Strategy 1997-2000). 8 November 2000, www.turku.fi/suomi/etusivu/kaupunginjohtaja/ tustrate.html .
56. University of Turku and the Åbo Akademi University, 1989. BioCity-työryhmän muistio (Memorandum of the BioCity Working Group). University of Turku and the Åbo Akademi University, Turku.
57. Vet J.M.D. Globalisation and local & regional competitiveness. STI Review. 13:1993;89-121.
58. Working Group for Research and Education, 2000. Turun bioalan strategia (Strategy for the Bio-sector in Turku). Biolaakso Ltd., Turku.
59. Vuori, S., Vuorinen, P., 1994. Outlines of the Finnish innovation system. The institutional set-up and performance. In: Vuori, S., Vuorinen, P. (Eds.), Explaining Technical Change in a Small Country. The Finnish National Innovation System. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 1-42.
60. Vuorinen, P., Tikka, T., Lovio, R., 1989. Suomen teknologiakeskukset (The Technology Centres of Finland), aluepoliittisia tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 1989:5. Sisäasiainministeriö, Helsinki.