Fairness and other leadership heuristics: A four-nation study

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 251-272

  Janson, Annick ^a   Levy, Lester ^a   Sitkin, Sim B ^b   Lind, E Allan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL   (New Zealand)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross national; Fairness; Leadership; Sacrifice

Indexed keywords

EID: 42049095135     PISSN: 1359432X     EISSN: 14640643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13594320701746510     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, pp. 267-299. Academic Press, New York
2. Bies, R. J. (2005) Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct?. Handbook of organizational justice, pp. 85-112. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ
3. Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N. and Menon, S. T. (2000) Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, pp. 747-767.
4. De Cremer, D. (2006) Affective and motivational consequences of self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp. 79-93.
5. De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M. and Bos, A. R. (2006) Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 27, pp. 554-565.
6. De Cremer, D. and van Knippenberg, D. (2002) How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp. 858-866.
7. De Cremer, D. and van Knippenberg, D. (2004) Charismatic leadership, collective identification, and leadership effectiveness: The interactive effects of leader self-sacrifice and self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, pp. 140-155.
8. De Cremer, D. and van Knippenberg, D. (2005) Cooperation as a function of leader self-sacrifice, trust, and identification. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 26:5, pp. 355-369.
9. Hains, S. C., Hogg, M. A. and Duck, J. M. (1997) Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, pp. 1087-1100.
10. Haslam, S. A. and Platow, M. J. (2001) Your wish is our command: The role of shared social identity in translating a leader's vision into followers' action. Social identity processes in organizational contexts, pp. 213-228. Psychology Press, Philadelphia
11. Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C. and Mason, I. (1998) Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 1248-1263.
12. House, R. J. (1971) A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, pp. 321-339.
13. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. and Gupta, V. (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., deLuque, M. S. and House, R. J. (2006) In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, pp. 67-90.
15. Judge, T. A. and Piccolo, R. F. (2004) Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, pp. 755-768.
16. Levy, L., Janson, A., Sitkin, S. B. and Lind, E. A. (2007) "Tall poppies" and other cultural dynamics in leadership, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
17. Lind, E. A. (2001) Fairness Heuristic Theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in organizational behavior, pp. 56-88. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
18. Lind, E. A., Kray, L. and Thompson, L. (2001) Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, pp. 189-210.
19. Lind, E. A. and Sitkin, S. (2007) The six domains of leadership: A new model for developing and assessing leadership qualities, Delta Leadership, Chapel Hill, NC
20. Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. R. (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice, Plenum, New York
21. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1978) A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, pp. 541-566.
22. Tyler, T. R. and Lind, E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, pp. 115-191. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
23. Bos, K. Van den, Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R. and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997) How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, pp. 1034-1046.
24. Bos, K. Van den, Lind, E. A. and Wilke, H. A. M. (2001) The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of Fairness Heuristic Theory. Justice in the workplace: Vol. 2. From theory to practice, pp. 49-66. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ
25. Bos, K. Van den, Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A. and Vermunt, R. (1998) Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp. 1493-1503.
26. Van Dijk, E. and De Cremer, D. (2006) Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, pp. 1352-1361.
27. Van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D. and van Knippenberg, B. (2007) Leadership and fairness: The state of the art. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
28. Van Knippenberg, D. and Hogg, M. A. (2003) A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 25, pp. 243-295. Elsevier, Amsterdam