The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory

Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages 49-66

  Van Den Bas, Kees ^a   Lind, E Allan ^b   Wilke, Henk A M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086553534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410600301-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Baron, J. (1993). Heuristics and biases in equity judgments: A utilitarian approach. In B. A. Meilers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions; Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
4. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (1997). There is no such thing as procedural justice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293-299.
6. Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 131-143). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). New York: Wiley.
8. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. M. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
10. Folger, R. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice: Multi-faceted meanings and interrelations. Social Justice Research, 9, 395-416.
11. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
12. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press.
13. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 340-342.
14. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
15. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
16. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
17. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
18. Lerner, M. J., & Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research (pp. 219-256). Bern, Austria: Huber.
19. Lind, E. A. (1992, March). The fairness heuristic: Rationality and “relationality” in procedural evaluations. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, Irvine, CA.
20. Lind, E. A. (1995a). Social conflict and social justice: Lessons from the social psychology of justice judgments. Inaugural oration, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
21. Lind, E. A. (1995b). Justice and authority relations in organizations. In R. Cropanzano & K. M. Kac-mar (Eds.), Organizational politics Justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace. Westport, CT: Quorom.
22. Lind, E. A. (1998). Procedural justice, disputing, and reactions to legal authorities. In A. Sarat, M. Constable, D. Engel, V. Hans & S. Lawrence (Eds.), Everyday practices and problem cases (pp. 177-198). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
23. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & De Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
24. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
25. Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 11-31). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives (pp. 61-94). New York: Praeger.
27. Rutte, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1995). An integrated model of perceived unfairness in organizations. Social Justice Research, 8, 239-261.
28. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161-176.
29. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., Ortiz, D. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group-membership, self-worth and procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
30. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers’ evaluations of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 23-40.
31. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
32. Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281-292.
33. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & McGraw, K. M. (1985). The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 700-725.
35. Van den Bos, K. (1996). Procedural justice and conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
36. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others?: The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.
37. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1996). The consistency rule and the voice effect: The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 411-428.
38. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
39. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.
40. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493-1503.
41. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.