Potential spatial overlap of heritage sites and protected areas in a boreal region of northern Canada

Conservation Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 376-386

  Leroux, Shawn J ^a,b   Schmiegelow, Fiona K A ^a   Nagy, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Boreal; Community based planning; Complementarity; Gwich'in; Protected areas strategy; Systematic conservation planning; Target based planning; Traditional ecological knowledge

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPLEMENTARITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; HERITAGE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; VEGETATION TYPE; WOODLAND;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ESKIMO; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CULTURE; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INUITS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NORTHWEST TERRITORIES; PLANNING TECHNIQUES;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

RANGIFER TARANDUS; RANGIFER TARANDUS CARIBOU;

EID: 33947515421     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00626.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alcorn, J. B. 1993. Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology 7:424-426.
2. Alexander, S. A., R. S. Ferguson, and K. J. McCormick. 1991. Key migratory bird terrestrial habitat sites in the Northwest Territories. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario.
3. Andre, A., and I. Kritsch. 1992. The traditional use of the Travaillant Lake area using trails and place names of the Gwichya Gwich'in from Arctic Red River. N.W.T. Gwich'in Social Cultural Institute, Arctic Red River, Northwest Territories.
4. Austin, J. E., A. D. Afton, M. G. Anderson, R. G. Clark, C. M. Custer, J. S. Lawrence, J. B. Pollard, and J. K. Ringelman. 2000. Declining scaup populations: issues, hypotheses, and research needs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:254-263.
5. Ball, I., and H. Possingham. 2000. MARXAN (v1.8.2): marine reserve design using spatially explicit annealing, a manual. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Available from http//: www.ecology.uq.edu.au/index.html? page=27710 (accessed April 2003).
6. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18:621-630.
7. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10:1251-1262.
8. Boyce, M. S., P. R. Vernier, S. E. Nielsen, and F. K. A. Schmiegelow. 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157:281-300.
9. Brandon, K. E., and M. Wells. 1992. Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Development 20:557-570.
10. Brosius, J. P. 2004. Indigenous peoples and protected areas at the world parks congress. Conservation Biology 18:609-612.
11. Bryant, D., D. Nielsen, and L. Tangley. 1997. The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economies on the edge. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
12. Cabeza, M. 2003. Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters 6:665-672.
13. Cabeza, M., and A. Moilanen. 2001. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:242-248.
14. Canadian Boreal Initiative. 2005. The boreal in the balance: securing the future of Canada's boreal region: a status report. Canadian Boreal Initiative, Ottawa, Ontario.
15. COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada). 2003. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada. COSEWIC, Ottawa, Ontario.
16. Decarie, R., F. Morneau, D. Lambert, S. Carrière, and J.-P.L. Savard. 1995. Habitat use by brood-rearing waterfowl in subarctic Quebec. Arctic 48:383-393.
17. Deh Cho First Nations, Government of Canada, and Government of the Northwest Territories. 2001. Deh Cho First Nations interim measures agreement. Deh Cho First Nations, Fort Simpson, Northwest Territories.
18. Drew, J. A. 2005. Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology 19:1286-1293.
19. Ducks Unlimited. 2002. Lower Mackenzie River delta, NT, earth cover classification user's guide. Ducks Unlimited, Rancho Cordova, California.
20. Ducks Unlimited. 2003. Peel plateau project earth cover user's guide. Ducks Unlimited, Rancho Cordova, California.
21. Ferguson, R. S. 1987. Wildlife areas of special interest to the department of renewable resources. Department of renewable resources, government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.
22. Ferraro, P. J. 2002. The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Ecological Economics 43:261-275.
23. Folke, C. 2004. Traditional knowledge in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9:7.
24. Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9:1.
25. Groves, C. R., D. B. Jensen, L. L. Valutis, K. H. Redford, M. L. Shaffer, J. M. Scott, J. V. Baumgartner, J. V. Higgins, M. W. Beck, and M. G. Anderson. 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. BioScience 52:499-512.
26. Gwich'in Land Use Planning Board. 2003. Working for the land. Gwich'in Land Use Planning Board, Inuvik, Northwest Territories.
27. Herrmann, T. M. 2006. Indigenous knowledge and management of Araucaria araucana forest in the Chilean Andes: implications for native forest conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:647-662.
28. Huntington, H. P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10:1270-1274.
29. Huntington, H. P. 2002. Can traditional ecological knowledge and wilderness benefit one another? Pages 64-68 in A. E. Watson, L. Alessa, and J. Sproull, editors. Wilderness in the circumpolar north: search for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
30. Johnson, C. J., D. R. Seip, and M. S. Boyce. 2004. A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:238-251.
31. Johnson, D. H., and J. W. Grier. 1988. Determinants of breeding distribution of ducks. Wildlife Monographs 100:1-37.
32. Kuhn, R. G., and F. Duerden. 1997. Northern land use planning and the Kluane land use plan. Northern Review 15:64-76.
33. Ludwig, D., M. Mangel, and B. Haddad. 2001. Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:481-517.
34. Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald, D. L. Thomas, T. L. McDonald, and W. P. Erickson. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
35. Margules, C. R., and R. L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253.
36. McDonnell, M. D., H. P. Possingham, I. R. Ball, and E. A. Cousins. 2002. Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7:107-114.
37. Nagy, J. A., D. Auriat, W. Wright, T. Slack, I. Ellsworth, and M. Kienzler. 2005. Ecology of boreal woodland caribou in the lower Mackenzie Valley, NT. Department of Resources, Wildlife, and Economic Development, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.
38. Nagy, J. A., A. Derocher, S. Nielsen, W. Wright, and J. Heikkila. 2006. Modelling seasonal habitats of boreal woodland caribou at the northern limits of their range: a preliminary assessment of the lower Mackenzie River valley, Northwest Territories, Canada. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.
39. National Energy Board. 1999. Mainland and Beaufort Delta historical seismic lines. National Energy Board, Calgary, Alberta.
40. Natural Resources Canada. 2000. Canadian digital elevation data (CDED), 1:250,000, NTSmapsheet 106D-P, 107A-B, 116H-I,P, 096E,L. Centre for Topographic Information, Sherbrooke, Quebec.
41. Nielsen, S. E., G. B. Stenhouse, and M. S. Boyce. 2006. A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta. Biological Conservation 130:217-229.
42. Northwest Territories Protected Areas Advisory Committee. 1999. NWT protected areas strategy: a balanced approach to establishing protected areas in the Northwest Territories. Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy Secretariat, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.
43. Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy Secretariat. 2003. Mackenzie valley five year action plan (2004-2009): conservation planning for pipeline development. Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy Secretariat, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories.
44. Noss, R. F., C. Carroll, K. Vance-Borland, and G. Wuerthner. 2002. A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Conservation Biology 16:895-908.
45. Oveido, G., and J. Brown. 1999. Building alliances with indigenous peples to establish and manage protected areas. Pages 99-108 in S. Stolton and N. Dudley, editors. Partnership for protection: new strategies for planning and management of protected areas. Earthscan Publications, London.
46. Parks Canada. 2004. An approach to aboriginal cultural landscapes. Parks Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Available from http//:www.pc.gc.ca/docs/r/pca-acl/index E.asp (accessed February 2006).
47. Parody, J. M., and B. T. Milne. 2004. Implications of rescaling rules for multi-scaled habitat models. Landscape Ecology 19:691-701.
48. Pfister, R. E. 2002. Collaboration across cultural boundaries to protect wild places: the British Columbia experience. Pages 27-35 in A. E. Watson, L. Alessa, and J. Sproull, editors. Wilderness in the circumpolar north: search for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
49. Possingham, H., I. Ball, and S. Andelman. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Pages 291-305 in S. Ferson and M. Burgman, editors. Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
50. Pressey, R. L. 2004. Conservation planning and biodiversity: assembling the best data for the job. Conservation Biology 18:1677-1681.
51. Pressey, R. L., R. M. Cowling, and M. Rouget. 2003. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Florisitic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112:99-127.
52. Pressey, R. L., and V. S. Logan. 1998. Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence on actual vs targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South Wales. Biological Conservation 85:305-319.
53. Sahtu Land Use Planning Board. 2002. Sahtu preliminary draft land use plan. Sahtu Land Use Planning Board, Fort Good Hope, Northwest Territories.
54. Sanderson, E. W., M. Jaiteh, M. A. Levy, K. H. Redford, A. V. Wannebo, and G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52:891-904.
55. Schneider, R. R., J. B. Stelfox, S. Boutin, and S. Wasel. 2003. Managing the cumulative impacts of land uses in the western canadian sedimentary basin: a modeling approach. Conservation Ecology 7:8.
56. Schwartzman, S., A. Moreira, and D. Nepstad. 2000. Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conservation Biology 14:1351-1357.
57. Smith, R. J. 2004. Conservation land-use zoning (CLUZ) software v.1.11. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, Canterbury, United Kingdom. Available from http//:www.mosaicconservation.org/cluz/index.html (accessed February 2005).
58. Stadel, A., R. Taniton, and H. Heder. 2002. Northwest Territories protected areas strategy: how community values are shaping the protection of wild spaces and heritage places. Pages 20-26 in A. E. Watson, L. Alessa, and J. Sproull, editors. Wilderness in the circumpolar north: search for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
59. Taku River Tlingit First Nation. 2003. Our land is our future: Taku River Tlingit First Nation vision and management direction for land and resources. Taku River Tlingit First Nation, Taku River, British Columbia.
60. van Jaarsveld, A. S., et al. 1998. Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279:2106-2108.
61. van Teeffelen, A. J. A., M. Cabeza, and A. Moilanen. 2006. Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:899-919.
62. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1992. Convention on biological diversity. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.
63. Venevsky, S., and I. Venevskaia. 2005. Hierarchical systematic conservation planning at the national level: identifying national biodiversity hotspots using abiotic factors in Russia. Biological Conservation 124:235-251.
64. Warman, L. D., A. R. E. Sinclair, G. G. E. Scudder, B. Klinkenberg, and R. L. Pressey. 2004. Sensitivity of systematic reserve selection to decisions about scale, biological data, and targets: case study from southern British Columbia. Conservation Biology 18:655-666.
65. Watson, A., L. Alessa, and B. Glaspell. 2003. The relationship between traditional ecological knowledge, evolving cultures, and wilderness protection in the circumpolar north. Conservation Ecology 8:2.
66. Wells, M. P., and T. O. McShane. 2004. Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio 33:513-519.
67. Whiting, A. 2004. The relationship between Qikiktagrugmiut (Kotzebue tribal members) and the Western Arctic Parklands, Alaska, United States. International Journal of Wilderness 10:28-31.
68. Wiersma, Y. F., and D. L. Urban. 2005. Beta diversity and nature reserve system design in the Yukon, Canada. Conservation Biology 19:1262-1272.