Priority-setting tool applied to Canada's landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species

Conservation Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1404-1415

  Dunn, Erica H ^a   Hussell, David J T ^b   Welsh, Daniel A ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVIFAUNA; CONSERVATION PLANNING; RANKING; VULNERABILITY;

CANADA;

EID: 0032715561     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98400.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allendorf, F. W., D. Bayles, D. L. Bottom, K. P. Currens, C. A. Frissell, D. Hankin, J. A. Lichatowich, W. Nehlsen, P. C. Trotter, and T. H. Williams. 1997. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conservation Biology 11:140-152.
2. American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds. 6th edition. Allen Press, lawrence, Kansas.
3. Canadian Wildlife Service. 1994. Canadian Landbird Monitoring Strategy. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
4. Carter, M. F., W. C. Hunter, D. N. Pashley, J. S. Bradley, C. S. Aid, J. Price, and G. S. Butcher. 1998. The Partners in Flight method for setting bird conservation priorities for states and physiographic areas of North America. In R. E. Bonney Jr., D. N. Pashley, and R. Cooper, editors. Strategies for bird conservation: creating the Partners in Flight planning process. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
5. Dunn, E. H. 1997. Setting priorities for conservation, research and monitoring of Canada's landbirds. Technical report 293. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa.
6. Dunn, E. H., M. D. Camden, and J. Bruce Falls, editors. 1997. Monitoring bird populations: the Canadian experience. Occasional papers 95. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa.
7. Hancock, J., and J. Kushlan. 1984. The herons handbook. Harper and Row. New York.
8. Hunter, W. C., M. F. Carter, D. N. Pashley, and K. Barker. 1993. The Partners in Flight species prioritixation scheme. Pages 109-119 in D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, editors. Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. General technical report RM-229. U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.
9. Inkley, D. 1985. Relationships between avian species richness and environmental characteristics in North America. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wyoming, Laramie.
10. Master, L. 1991. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5:559-563.
11. Meyer de Schauensee, R. 1970. A guide to the birds of South America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
12. Millsap, B. A., J. A. Gore, D. E. Runde, and S. I. Cerulean. 1990. Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monograph 111.
13. National Geographic Society. 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. 2nd edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
14. Peterjohn, B. G., and J. R. Sauer. 1993. North American Breeding Bird Survey annual summary 1990-1991. Bird Populations 1:1-15.
15. Peterson, R. T. 1980. A field guide to the birds of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
16. Peterson, R. T., and E. L. Chalif. 1990. A field guide to western birds. 3rd edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
17. Poole, A., and F. Gill, editors. 1992-1997. The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
18. Rabinowitz, D., S. Cairns, and T. Dillon. 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. Pages 182-204 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. Rappole, J. H., E. S. Morton, T. E. Lovejoy, and J. L. Ruos. 1983. Nearctic avian migrants in the Neotropics. United States Fish and Wildlife Service and World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
20. Reed, J. M. 1992. A system for ranking conservation priorities for Neotropical migrant birds based on relative susceptibility to extinction. Pages 524-536 in J. M. Hagan and D. W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landhirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. D.C.
21. Rosenberg, K. V., and J. V. Wells. 1998. Global perspectives on Neotropical migrant conservation in the Northeast: long-term responsibility vs. immediate concern. In R. E. Bonney Jr., D. N. Pashley, and R. Cooper, editors. Strategies for bird conservation: creating the Partners in Flight planning process. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
22. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B. G. Peterjohn. 1997. The North American Breeding Bird Survey results and analysis. Version 96.3. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland.
23. Sparrowe, R. D., and H. M. Wright. 1975. Setting priorities for the endangered species program. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 40:142-156.
24. The Nature Conservancy. 1988. Natural Heritage Program operations manual. Revised edition. Arlington, Virginia.
25. World Conservation Union. 1996. 1996 IUCN red list of threatened animals. Gland, Switzerland.