Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: The partners in flight approach

Auk

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 541-548

  Carter, Michael F ^a   Hunter, William C ^b   Pashley, David N ^c   Rosenberg, Kenneth V ^d  

^a Colorado Bird Observatory ^*  (United States)

^b US Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region   (United States)

^c American Bird Conservancy   (United States)

^d Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034008771     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/auk/117.2.541     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1998. Checklist of North American birds, 7th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
2. ASKINS, R. A., J. F. LYNCH, AND R. GREENBERG. 1990. Population declines of migratory birds of eastern North America. Current Ornithology 7:1057.
3. BEISSINGER, S. R., J. M. REED, J. R. WUNDERLE, JR., S. K. ROBINSON, AND D. M. FINCH. 2000. Report of the AOU Conservation Committee on the Partners in Flight species prioritization plan. Auk 117:549-561.
4. CARTER, M. F., AND K. BARKER. 1993. An interactive database for setting conservation priorities for western Neotropical migrants. Pages 120-144 in Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds (D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, Eds.). United States Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.
5. CARTER, M., G. FENWICK, C. HUNTER, D. PASHLEY, D. PETIT, J. PRICE, AND J. TRAPP. 1996. For the future. Field Notes 50:238-240.
6. DUNN, E. H., D. J. T. HUSSELL, AND D. A. WELSH. 1999. Priority-setting tool applied to Canada's landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species. Conservation Biology 13:1404-1415.
7. FINCH, D. M., AND P. W. STANGEL (Eds.). 1993. Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds. United States Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.
8. HOWELL, S. N. G., AND S. WEBB. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. HUNTER, W. C., M. F. CARTER, D. N. PASHLEY, AND K. BARKER. 1993. The Partners in Flight prioritization scheme. Pages 109-119 in Status and management of Neotropical migratory birds (D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, Eds.). United States Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.
10. KNOPF, F. L. 1994. Avian assemblages on altered grasslands. Pages 232-246 in A century of avifaunal change in western North America (J. R. Jehl and N. K. Johnson, Eds.). Studies in Avian Biology No. 15.
11. MASTER, L. 1991. Assessing threats and setting priorities for conservation. Conservation Biology 5: 559-563.
12. MILLSAP, B. A., J. A. GORE, D. E. RUNDE, AND S. I. CERULEAN. 1990. Setting priorities for conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monographs No. 111.
13. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY. 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America, 2nd ed. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
14. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY. 1993. Our world, 2nd ed. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
15. PASHLEY, D. 1996. Watch list. Field Notes 50:129-134.
16. PRICE, J., S. DROEGE, AND A. PRICE. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, London.
17. ROBBINS, C. S., D. BYSTRAK, AND P. H. GEISSLER. 1986. The Breeding Bird Survey: Its first fifteen years, 1965-1979. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication No. 157.
18. ROSENBERG, K. V., AND J. V. WELLS. 1995. Important geographic areas to Neotropical migrant birds in the Northeast. Report to United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts.
19. ROSENBERG, K. V., AND J. V. WELLS. 2000. Global perspectives on Neotropical migrant conservation in the Northeast: Long-term responsibility vs. immediate concern. In press in Strategies for bird conservation: The Partners in Flight planning process (R. E. Bonney, D. Pashley, R. J. Cooper, and L. Niles, Eds.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.