Assessing conservation value of bird communities with partners in flight-based ranks

Auk

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 541-549

  Nuttle, Tim ^a,c   Leidolf, Andreas ^a   Burger Jr , Loren W ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVES;

EID: 0037803724     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4090211     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. BEISSINGER, S. R., J. M. REED, J. M. WUNDERLE, JR., S. K. ROBINSON, AND D. M. FINCH. 2000. Report of the AOU Conservation Committee on the Partners in Flight species prioritization plan. Auk 117:549-561.
2. BIBBY, C. J., N. D. BURGESS, AND D. A. HILL. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
3. BRYCE, S. A., R. M. HUGHES, AND P. R. KAUFMANN. 2002. Development of a bird integrity index: Using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition. Environmental Management 30:294-310.
4. CARTER, M. F., W. C. HUNTER, D. N. PASHLEY, AND K. V. ROSENBERG. 2000. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight approach. Auk 117:541-548.
5. GÖTMARK, F., M. AHLUND, AND M. O. G. ERIKSSON. 1986. Are indices reliable for assessing conservation value of natural areas? An avian case study. Biological Conservation 38:55-73.
6. HAMEL, P. B., D. J. TWEDT, T. J. NUTTLE, C. A. WOODSON, F. BROERMAN, AND J. M. WAHOME. 2002. Winter bird communities in afforestation: Should we speed up or slow down ecological succession? Pages 98-108 in Proceedings of a Conference on Sustainability of Wetlands and Water Resources: How Well Can Riverine Wetlands Continue to Support Society into the 21st Century? (M. M. Holland, M. L. Warren, and J. A. Stanturf, Eds.). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-50.
7. HUNTER, W. C., M. F. CARTER, D. N. PASHLEY, AND K. BARKER. 1993. Partners in Flight species prioritization scheme. Pages 109-119 in Status and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds (D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, Eds.). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.
8. HUNTER, M. L. AND A. HUTCHINSON. 1994. The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: Conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conservation Biology 8:1163-1165.
9. LEIDOLF, A. 1999. Avian community response to fire in a Gambel oak woodland. M.S. thesis, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Utah State University, Logan.
10. LEIDOLF, A., M. L. WOLFE, AND R. L. PENDLETON. 2000. Bird communities of Gambel oak: A descriptive analysis. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-48.
11. MACARTHUR, R. H., AND J. V. MACARTHUR. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594-600.
12. MAURER, B. A. 1993. Biological diversity, ecological integrity, and neotropical migrants: New perspectives for wildlife management. Pages 24-31 in Status and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds (D. M. Finch and P. W. Stangel, Eds.). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report RM-229.
13. MCSHEA, W. J., AND J. H. RAPPOLE. 2000. Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations. Conservation Biology 14:1161-1170.
14. NUTTLE, T. J. 1997. Response of breeding bird communities to afforestation of hardwood bottomland sites in Mississippi. M.S. thesis, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.
15. NUTTLE, T. AND L. W. BURGER. 1996a. Response of breeding bird communities to restoration of hardwood bottomlands. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeastern Fish and Wildlife Agencies 50:228-236.
16. NUTTLE, T. AND L. W. BURGER. 1996b. Response of breeding bird communities to afforestation of hardwood bottomland sites in Mississippi. Page 749 in The Delta: Connecting Points of View for Sustainable Natural Resources. Memphis, Tennessee.
17. RALPH, C. J., G. R. GEUPEL, P. PYLE, T. E. MARTIN, AND D. F. DESANTE. 1993. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-144.
18. RALPH, C. J., J. R. SAUER, AND S. DROEGE. 1995. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: Standards and applications. Pages 161-175 in Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts (C. J. Ralph, J. R. Sauer, and S. Droege, Eds.). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-149.
19. ROBBINS, C. S., D. BYSTRAK, AND P. H. GEISSLER. 1986. The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 157.
20. ROTH, R. R. 1976. Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity. Ecology 57:773-782.
21. SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technology Journal 27:379-423, 623-656.
22. SIMPSON, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688.
23. TWEDT, D. J., R. R. WILSON, J. L. HENNE-KERR, AND R. B. HAMILTON. 1999. Impact of forest type and management strategy on avian densities in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 123:261-274.
24. WILLSON, M. F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55:1017-1029.