Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Versus Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography for Treatment Planning in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomised Controlled Diagnostic Trial

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 514-521

  Vahl, A C ^a   Geselschap, J ^a   Montauban van Swijndregt, A D ^a   Smit, J ^a   Sala, J ^a   Turkcan, K ^a   Dijksman, L M ^a   Visser, M J T ^a  

^a Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography; Magnetic resonance angiography; Patient satisfaction; Peripheral vascular diseases; Treatment costs

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 41649120198     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: 15322165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Busch H.P., Hoffmann H.G., Rock J., and Schneider C. MR angiography of pelvic and leg vessels with automatic table movement technique ("Mobi-Trak")-clinical experience with 450 studies. Rofo 173 (2001) 405-409
2. Koelemay M.J., Lijmer J.G., Stoker J., Legemate D.A., and Bossuyt P.M. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285 (2001) 1338-1345
3. Kreitner K.F., Kalden P., Neufang A., Düber C., Krummenauer F., Küstner E., et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 171-179
4. Lundin P., Svensson A., Henriksen E., Jonason T., Forssell C., Bäckbro B., et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 41 (2000) 125-132
5. Nelemans P.J., Leiner T., de Vet H.C., and van Engelshoven J.M. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 217 (2000) 105-114
6. Ruehm S.G., Nanz D., Baumann A., Schmid M., and Debatin J.F. 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vessels: value of image subtraction. J Magn Reson Imaging 13 (2001) 402-411
7. Cronberg C.N., Sjoberg S., Albrechtsson U., Leander P., Lindh M., Norgren L., et al. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 44 (2003) 59-66
8. Klein W.M., Schlejen P.M., Eikelboom B.C., van der G.Y., and Mali W.P. MR angiography of the lower extremities with a moving-bed infusion-tracking technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26 (2003) 1-8
9. Winterer J.T., Schaefer O., Uhrmeister P., Zimmermann-paul G., Lehnhardt S., Altehoefer C., et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol 41 (2002) 153-160
10. Leiner T., Kessels A.G., Schurink G.W., Kitslaar P.J.E.H.M., De Haan M.W., Tordoir J.H.M., et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol 39 (2004) 435-444
11. Schmitt R., Coblenz G., Cherevatyy O., Brunner H., Fröhner S., Wedell E., et al. Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 2513-2524
12. Leiner T., Tordoir J.H., Kessels A.G., Nelemans PJ., Schurink GW., Kitslaar PJ., et al. Comparison of treatment plans for peripheral arterial disease made with multi-station contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 1255-1262
13. Reid S.K., Pagan-Marin H.R., Menzoian J.O., Woodson J., and Yucel E.K. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 (2001) 45-53
14. Dormandy J.A., and Rutherford R.B. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 31 (2000) S1-S296
15. Idanpaan-Heikkila J.E. WHO guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products: responsibilities of the investigator. Ann Med 26 (1994) 89-94
16. Moher D., Schulz K.F., and Altman D.G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 134 (2001) 657-662
17. Swan J.S., Fryback D.G., Lawrence W.F., Katz DA., Heisey DM., Hagenauer ME., et al. MR and conventional angiography: work in progress toward assessing utility in radiology. Acad Radiol 4 (1997) 475-482
18. Krause U.J., Pabst T., Kenn W., Wittenberg G., and Hahn D. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. Angiology 55 (2004) 119-125
19. Steffens J.C., Schafer F.K., Oberscheid B., Link J., Jahnke T., Heller M., and Brossman J. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. Acta Radiol 44 (2003) 185-192
20. Low G., Mizzi A., Ong K., Lau P.F., and McKinstery J. Technical inadequacies of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: incidence, causes and management strategies. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 937-945
21. Janka R., Wenkel E., Fellner C., Lang W., Bautz W., and Uder M. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: when is an additional conventional angiography required?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29 (2006) 220-229
22. Ouwendijk R., De Vries M., Pattynama P.M.T., Van Sambeek M.R.H.M., De Haan M.W., Stijnen T., et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 236 (2005) 1094-1103
23. Ouwendijk R., Kock M.C.J.M., Visser K., Pattynama P.M.T., De Haan M.W., and Hunink M.G.M. Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease. AJR 185 (2005) 1261-1267
24. Kock M.C., Adriaensen M.E., Pattynama P.M., Van Sambeek MR., Van Urk H., Stijnen T., et al. DSA versus multi-detector row CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: randomized controlled trial. Radiology 237 (2005) 727-737