Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: When is an additional conventional angiography required?

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 220-229

  Janka, R ^a   Wenkel, E ^a   Fellner, C ^b   Lang, W ^a   Bautz, W ^a   Uder, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Institute of Radiology   (Austria)

Author keywords

CA; MRA; PAOD; Peripheral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 32544450616     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0068-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Janka R, Fellner F, Fellner C, et al. (2000) Dedicated phased-array coil for peripheral MRA. Eur Radiol 10:1745-1749
2. Schafer FK, Schafer PJ, Jahnke T, et al. (2003) [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Comparison to intraarterial DSA]. Rofo 175:556-564
3. Wyttenbach R, Gianella S, Alerci M, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of Gd-DOTA- versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced peripheral MR angiography, as compared with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 227:261-269
4. Gregor M, Tombach B, Hentsch A, et al. (2002) Peripheral run-off CE-MRA with a 1.0 molar gadolinium chelate (Gadovist) with intraarterial DSA comparison. Acad Radiol 9(Suppl 2):S398-S400
5. Janka R, Fellner FA, Fellner C, et al. (2000) [A hybrid technique for the automatic floating table MRA of peripheral arteries using a dedicated phased-array coil combination]. Rofo 172:477-481
6. Janka R, Fellner FA, Fellner C, et al. (2001) [Fully automated floating table MR angiography of pelvic and leg arteries: Initial clinical results]. Rontgenpraxis 54:62-70
7. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. (2001) Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 357:1086-1091
8. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, et al. (1998) Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology 206:673-681
9. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. (1999) Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 211:59-67
10. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, et al. (1997) Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 205:163-169
11. Klein WM, Schlejen PM, Eikelboom BC, et al. (2003) MR angiography of the lower extremities with a moving-bed infusion-tracking technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:1-8
12. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. J Vasc Surg 26:517-538
13. Fellner FA, Requardt M, Lang W, et al. (2003) Peripheral vessels: MR angiography with dedicated phased-array coil with large-field-of-view adapter feasibility study. Radiology 228:284-289
14. Janka R, Fellner C, Wenkel E, et al. (2005) CE-MRA of the peripheral arteries including the pedal vessels at 1.0 T: A feasibility study using a dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology 235:319-326
15. Eiberg JP, Lundorf E, Thomsen C, et al. (2001) Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography: A review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:396-402
16. Cronberg CN, Sjoberg S, Albrechtsson U, et al. (2003) Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 44:59-66
17. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. (1999) Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:583-589
18. Cortell ED, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. (1996) MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography. Am J Roentgenol 167:147-151
19. Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Barker CF, et al. (1996) The fate of bypass grafts to angiographically occult runoff vessels detected by magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 23:483-489
20. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. (2000) Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 174:171-179
21. Fellner F, Janka R, Fellner C, et al. (1999) Post occlusion visualization of peripheral arteries with "floating table" MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 17:1235
22. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Schurink GW, et al. (2004) Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol 39:435-444
23. Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Waltering KU, et al. (2004) Optimization of contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression (VENCO). Rofo 176:157-162