MR and Conventional Angiography: Work in Progress toward Assessing Utility in Radiology

Academic Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 475-482

  Swan, J Shannon ^a   Fryback, Dennis G ^a   Lawrence, William F ^a,c   Katz, David A ^a   Heisey, Dennis M ^a   Hagenauer, Mary Ellen ^a   Selzer, Peter M ^b   Jacobson, Bruce K ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b MERITER HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography, comparative studies; Cost effectiveness; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031178806     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(97)80231-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein, MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1996.
2. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. Efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:88-94.
3. Phelps CE, Mushlin AI. Focusing technology assessment using medical decision theory. Med Decis Making 1988; 8:279-289.
4. Yin D, Forman HP, Langlotz CP. Evaluating health services: the importance of patients' preferences and quality of life. AJR 1995; 165:1323-1328.
5. Evens RG. Making difficult health policy decisions: most choices are not simply life or death. AJR 1995; 165:1329-1330.
6. Katz DA, Cohen BJ. Temporary treatment-related health states in decision analytic models: is the full burden of morbidity being captured? Med Decis Making 1995; 15:415A.
7. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. JAMA 1995; 274:875-880.
8. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191:155-164.
9. Holland GA, Slossman F, Baum RA, et al. Fast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries using gadolinium: optimization and preliminary experience (abstr). In: Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995; 1577.
10. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences. I. Measurement strategies. J Cain Epidemiol 1989; 42:345-354.
11. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 1972; 7:118-133.
12. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986; 5:1-30.
13. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1993; 112-148.
14. Chestnut LG, Keller LR, Lambert WE, Rowe RD. Measuring heart patients willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms. Med Decis Making 1996; 16:65-77.
15. Berwick DM, Weinstein MC. What do patients value? willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Med Care 1985; 23:881-893.
16. Ware J Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473-483.
17. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health states and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993; chap 5.
18. Lenart LA, Cher DJ, Goldstein MK, Garber AM. Search procedures for utility values: it makes a difference how you ask (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the Society of Medical Decision Making. Toronto, Canada: Society of Medical Decision Making, 1996.
19. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams S. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J Health Econ 1996; 15:209-231.
20. Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 1994; 14:9-18.