Interobserver agreement for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and MDCT angiography in peripheral arterial disease

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1261-1267

  Ouwendijk, Rody ^a   Kock, Marc C J M ^a   Visser, Karen ^a   Pattynama, Peter M T ^a   De Haan, Michiel W ^b   Hunink, Myriam G M ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CALCIFICATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33644841422     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1296     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Meijer WT, Hoes AW, Rutgers D, Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18:185-192
2. Picus D, Hicks ME, Darcy MD, Kleinhoffer MA. Comparison of nonsubtracted digital angiography and conventional screen-film angiography for the evaluation of patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1991; 2:359-364
3. Maiden ES, Picus D, Vesely TM, Darcy MD, Hicks ME. Peripheral vascular disease: evaluation with stepping DSA and conventional screen-film angiography. Radiology 1994; 191:149-153
4. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992; 182:243-246
5. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692
6. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67
7. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002; 225:43-52
8. Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Sakaguchi T, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrastenhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 216:909-915
9. Rubin GD. MDCT imaging of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45[suppl 1]:S42-S49
10. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Idling AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 215:670-676
11. Tins B, Oxtoby J, Patel S. Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:219-225
12. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2003; 180:719-724
13. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2003; 180:1085-1091
14. Catalano CFF, Laghi A, Napoli A, et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004; 231:555-563
15. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003; 226:798-811
16. Romano M, Mainenti PP, Imbriaco M, et al. Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50:303-308
17. Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barren BJ, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:143-149
18. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990; 175:621-628
19. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190:181-189
20. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271:389-391
21. Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1991
22. Hertz SM, Baum RA, Owen RS, Holland GA, Logan DR, Carpenter JP. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and contrast arteriography in peripheral arterial stenosis. Am J Surg 1993; 166:112-116
23. Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, et al. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:121-127
24. Prokop M. Protocols and future directions in imaging of renal artery stenosis: CT angiography. J Cornput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23[suppl 1]:S101-S110
25. Misare BD, Pomposelli FB Jr, Gibbons GW, Campbell DR, Freeman DV, LoGerfo FW. Infrapopliteal bypasses to severely calcified, unclampable outflow arteries: two-year results. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24:6-16
26. Herrington DM, Kim LS, Miller ME, Mitchell SE, Walford GD, Dobs AS. Visual and quantitative computerized assessment of disease severity on peripheral angiograms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:595-602