Structural features of the full-length adaptor protein GADS in solution determined using small-angle X-ray scattering

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1766-1772

  Moran, Oscar ^a   Roessle, Manfred W ^b   Mariuzza, Roy A ^c   Dimasi, Nazzareno ^d  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d G GASLINI INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAP2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN RECEPTOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GEL CHROMATOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; SMALL ANGLE SCATTERING; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; T LYMPHOCYTE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; SCATTERING, SMALL ANGLE; SOLUTIONS; T-LYMPHOCYTES; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 41449096648     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.116590     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Rosenberg, S. A., J. C. Yang, and N. P. Restifo. 2004. Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nat. Med. 10:909-915.
2. Shankaran, V., H. Ikeda, A. T. Bruce, J. M. White, P. E. Swanson, L. J. Old, and R. D. Schreiber. 2001. IFNgamma and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity. Nature. 410:1107-1111.
3. Jordan, M. S., A. L. Singer, and G. A. Koretzky. 2003. Adaptors as central mediators of signal transduction in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 4:110-116.
4. Samelson, L. E. 2002. Signal transduction mediated by the T cell antigen receptor: the role of adapter proteins. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20:371-394.
5. Mayer, B. J. 1999. Protein-protein interactions in signaling cascades. Mol. Biotechnol. 13:201-213.
6. Houtman, J. C. D., Y. Higashimoto, N. Dimasi, S. Cho, H. Yamaguchi, B. Bowden, C. Regan, E. L. Malchiodi, R. Mariuzza, P. Schuck, E. Appella, and L. E. Samelson. 2004. Binding specificity of multiprotein signaling complexes is determined by both cooperative interactions and affinity preferences. Biochemistry. 43:4170-4178.
7. Houtman, J. C. D., H. Yamaguchi, M. Barda-Saad, A. Braiman, B. Bowden, E. Appella, P. Schuck, and L. E. Samelson. 2006. Oligo-merization of signaling complexes by the multipoint binding of GRB2 to both LAT and SOS1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:798-805.
8. Bhalla, J., G. B. Storchan, C. M. MacCarthy, V. N. Uversky, and O. Tcherkasskaya. 2006. Local flexibility in molecular function paradigm. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 5:1212-1223.
9. Dunker, A. K., C. J. Brown, and Z. Obradovic. 2002. Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 62:25-49.
10. Dimasi, N. 2007. Crystal structure ofthe C-terminal SH3 domain of the adaptor protein GADS in complex with SLP-76 motifpeptide reveals a unique SH3-SH3 interaction. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39:109-123.
11. Liu, S. K., and C. J. McGlade. 1998. Gads is a novel SH2 and SH3 domain-containing adaptor protein that binds to tyrosine-phosphory-lated Shc. Oncogene. 17:3073-3082.
12. Berry, D. M., P. Nash, S. K. W. Liu, T. Pawson, and C. J. McGlade. 2002. A high-affinity Arg-X-X-Lys SH3 binding motif confers specificity for the interaction between Gads and SLP-76 in T cell signaling. Curr. Biol. 12:1336-1341.
13. Yoder, J., C. Pham, Y. M. Iizuka, O. Kanagawa, S. K. Liu, J. McGlade, and A. M. Cheng. 2001. Requirement for the SLP-76 adaptor GADS in T cell development. Science. 291:1987-1991.
14. Cho, S., C. A. Velikovsky, C. P. Swaminathan, J. C. Houtman, L. E. Samelson, and R. A. Mariuzza. 2004. Structural basis for differential recognition of tyrosine-phosphorylated sites in the linker for activation of T cells (LAT) by the adaptor Gads. EMBO J. 23:1441-1451.
15. Liu, Q., D. Berry, P. Nash, T. Pawson, C. J. McGlade, and S. S.-C. Li. 2003. Structural basis for specific binding of the Gads SH3 domain to an RxxK motif-containing SLP-76 peptide: a novel mode of peptide recognition. Mol. Cell. 11:471-481.
16. Harkiolaki, M., M. Lewitzky, R. J. C. Gilbert, E. Y. Jones, R. P. Bourette, G. Mouchiroud, H. Sondermann, I. Moarefi, and S. M. Feller. 2003. Structural basis for SH3 domain-mediated high-affinity binding between Mona/Gads and SLP-76. EMBO J. 22:2571-2582.
17. Lewitzky, M., M. Harkiolaki, M.-C. Domart, E. Y. Jones, and S. M. Feller. 2004. Mona/Gads SH3C binding to hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 (HPK1) combines an atypical SH3 binding motif, R/KXXK, with a classical PXXP motif embedded in a polyproline type II (PPII) helix. J. Biol. Chem. 279:28724-28732.
18. Svergun, D. I., and M. H. Koch. 2002. Advances in structure analysis using small-angle scattering in solution. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:654-660.
19. Roessle, M. W., R. Klaering, U. Ristau, B. Robrahn, D. Jahn, T. Gehrmann, P. Konarev, A. Round, S. Fiedler, C. Hermes, and D. Svergun. 2007. Upgrade of the small-angle x-ray scattering beamline X33 at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hamburg. J. Appl. Cryst. 40:s190-s194.
20. Dimasi, N., M. Roessle, O. Moran, G. Candiano, D. I. Svergun, and R. Biassoni. 2007. Molecular analysis and solution structure from small-angle x-ray scattering of the human natural killer inhibitory receptor IRp60 (CD300a). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 40:193-200.
21. Svergun, D. I. 1999. Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing. Biophys. J. 76:2879-2886.
22. Svergun, D. I., M. V. Petoukhov, and M. H. Koch. 2001. Determination of domain structure of proteins from x-ray solution scattering. Biophys. J. 80:2946-2953.
23. Volkov, V. V., and D. I. Svergun. 2003. Uniqueness of ab initio shape determination in small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Cryst. 36:860-864.
24. Kozin, M. B., and D. I. Svergun. 2001. Automated matching of high-and low-resolution structural models. J. Appl. Cryst. 34:33-41.
25. Petoukhov, M. V., and D. I. Svergun. 2005. Global rigid body modeling of macromolecular complexes against small-angle scattering data. Biophys. J. 89:1237-1250.
26. Sali, A., and T. L. Blundell. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779-815.
27. Laskowski, R. A., M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton. 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26:283-291.
28. Schlessinger, A., and B. Rost. 2005. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins. 61:115-126.
29. Uversky, V. N. 2002. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem./FEBS. 269:2-12.
30. Uversky, V. N., J. R. Gillespie, and A. L. Fink. 2000. Why are ''natively unfolded'' proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins. 41:415-427.
31. Prilusky, J., C. E. Felder, T. Zeev-Ben-Mordehai, E. H. Rydberg, O. Man, J. S. Beckmann, I. Silman, and J. L. Sussman. 2005. FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics. 21:3435-3438.
32. Cuff, J. A., M. E. Clamp, A. S. Siddiqui, M. Finlay, and G. J. Barton. 1998. JPred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics. 14:892-893.
33. Guinier, A., and G. Fournet. 1955. Small angle scattering of x-rays. Wiley, New York.
34. Kratky, O., and I. Pilz. 1972. Recent advances and applications of diffuse x-ray small-angle scattering on biopolymers in dilute solutions. Q. Rev. Biophys. 5:481-537.
35. Tcherkasskaya, O., E. A. Davidson, and V. N. Uversky. 2003. Biophysical constraints for protein structure prediction. J. Proteome Res. 2:37-42.