Biophysical constraints for protein structure prediction

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 37-42

  Tcherkasskaya, Olga ^a   Davidson, Eugene A ^a   Uversky, Vladimir N ^b,c  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Folding; Molecular dimension; Prediction; Protein; Structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; CALCULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RADIATION SCATTERING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICS; DATABASES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037274604     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr025552q     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. The Genome International Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature Biotechnol. 2001, 409, 860-921.
2. Venter, J. C.; Adams, M. D.; Myers, E. W.; Li, P. W.; Mural, R. J.; Sutton, G. G. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001, 291, 1304-1351.
3. Edwards, A. M.; Arrowsmith, C. H.; des Pallieres, B. Proteomics: New tools for a new era. Modern drug discovery 2000, 5 (7), 35-44.
4. Turcotte, M.; Muggleton, S. H.; Sternberg, M. J. Automated discovery of structural signatures of protein fold and function. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 306, 591-605.
5. Todd, A. E.; Orengo, C. A.; Thornton, J. M. Evolution of function in protein super-families, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 307, 1113-1143.
6. Thornton, J. M.; Todd, A. E.; Milburn, D.; Borkakoti, N.; Orengo, C. A. From structure to function: approaches and limitations. Nature Struct. Biol. 2000, 7 (Suppl.), 991-994.
7. Forster, M. J. Molecular modeling in structural biology. Micron 2002, 33 (4), 365-384.
8. Osguthorpe, D. J. Ab initio protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10 (2), 146-152.
9. Simons, K. T.; Strauss, C.; Baker, D. Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 306, 1191-1199.
10. Rohl, C. A.; Baker, D. De novo determination of protein backbone structure from residual dipolar couplings using Rosetta. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (11), 2723-2729.
11. Zheng, W.; Doniach, S. Protein structure prediction constrained by solution X-ray scattering data and structural homology identification. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316 (1), 173-87.
12. Svergun, D. I. Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing. Biophys. J. 1999, 76 (6), 2879-2886.
13. Jernigan, R. L.; Bahar, I.; Covell, D. G.; Atilgan, A. R.; Erman. B.; Flatow, D. T. Relating the structure of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase to its processing step. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2000, 1, 49-55.
14. Hinds, D. A.: Levitt, M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 243, 668-682.
15. Xia, Y.; Huang, E. S.; Levitt, M.; Samudrala, R. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 171-185.
16. Lee, C.; Subbiah, S. Prediction of protein side-chain conformation by packing optimization. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 217, 373-388.
17. Koehl, P.; Delarue, M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 239, 249-275.
18. Grossberg, A. Yu.; Khohlov, A. R. Statistical Physics of Macromolecules; Nauka: Moscow, 1989; p 344.
19. Tanford, C. Protein denaturation. Adv. Prot. Chem. 1968, 23, 121-282.
20. Tanford, C. Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules; Willey: New York, 1961.
21. Tcherkasskaya, O.; Uversky, V. N. Denatured collapse states in protein folding: Example of apomyoglobin. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2001, 44, 244-254.
22. Uversky, V. N. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 2-12.
23. Uversky, V. N. Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 739-756.
24. Wilkins, D. K.; Grimshaw, S. B.; Receveur, V.; Dobson, C. M.; Jones, J. A.; Smith, L. J. Hydrodynamic radii of native and denatured proteins measured by pulse field gradient NMR techniques. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 8, 16 424-16 431, and references therein.
25. Tanford, C.; Kawahara, K.; Lapanje, S. Proteins in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride. Demonstration of random coil behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89 (9), 729-736.
26. Skolnick, J.; Kolinski, A.; Ortiz, A. R. MONSSTER: A Method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 217-241.
27. Kuszewski, J.; Gronenborn, A. M.; Clore, G. M. Improving the packing and accuracy of NMR structures with pseudo-potential for the radius of gyration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121 (1), 2337-2338.